Effect of patch size and isolation on mating patterns and seed production in an urban population of Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.)

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 260, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 965-974

  Wang, Hongfang ^a   Sork, Victoria L ^b   Wu, Jianguo ^a,c   Ge, Jianping ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AIC; Fragmentation; General linear model; Paternity analysis; Pinus tabulaeformis; Urban landscape

Indexed keywords

ADULT TREES; AVERAGE NUMBERS; CRITICAL ISSUES; EDGE DISTANCE; FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; GENERAL LINEAR MODELS; GENETIC DIVERSITY; LOCAL POPULATIONS; LONG DISTANCES; MICROSATELLITE LOCI; PATCH SIZE; PATERNITY ANALYSIS; PINUS TABULAEFORMIS; SEED PRODUCTION; SELFING; SPATIAL ARRAYS; TREE POPULATION; TREE SPECIES; URBAN LANDSCAPE; URBAN POPULATION;

CHLOROPHYLL; FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POPULATION STATISTICS;

SEED;

CONIFEROUS TREE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FRAGMENTATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INBREEDING; ISOLATION EFFECT; LANDSCAPE; MATING BEHAVIOR; PATCH SIZE; POLLINATION; POPULATION SIZE; SEED PRODUCTION; URBAN ECOSYSTEM;

CHLOROPHYLLS; CITIES; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; FRAGMENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PINUS TABULAEFORMIS; POLLEN; SEEDS; STATISTICS; TREES;

BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA;

PINUS TABULIFORMIS;

EID: 77955516446     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aguilar R., Quesada M., Ashworth L., Herrerias-Diego Y., Lobo J. Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:5177-5188.
2. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 1974, 19:716-723.
3. Alcazar P., Galan C., Carinanos P., Dominguez-Vilches E. Effects of sampling height and climatic conditions in aerobiological studies. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 1999, 9:253-261.
4. Armbruster P., Reed D.H. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 2005, 95:235-242.
5. Bacles C.F.E., Burczyk J., Lowe A.J., Ennos R.A. Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution 2005, 59:979-990.
6. Bacles C.F.E., Ennos R.A. Paternity analysis of pollen-mediated gene flow for Fraxinus excelsior L. in a chronically fragmented landscape. Heredity 2008, 101:368-380.
7. Barrett S.C.H., Kohn J.R. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants 1991, 3-30. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. D.A. Falk, K.E. Holsinger (Eds.).
8. Bittencourt J.V.M., Sebbenn A.M. Patterns of pollen and seed dispersal in a small, fragmented population of the wind-pollinated tree Araucaria angustifolia in southern Brazil. Heredity 2007, 99:580-591.
9. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
10. Butcher P.A., Skinner A.K., Gardiner C.A. Increased inbreeding and inter-species gene fl{ligature}ow in remnant populations of the rare Eucalyptus benthamii. Conserv. Genet. 2005, 6:213-226.
11. Cheptou P.O. Population biology: the ecology of inbreeding depression. Heredity 2005, 96:110-1110.
12. Clark D.A., Clark D.B. Temporal and environmental patterns of reproduction in Zamia Skinneri, a tropical rain forest cycad. J. Ecol. 1987, 75:135-149.
13. Eckert C.G., Kalisz S., Geber M.A., Sargent R., Elle E., Cheptou P.O., Goodwillie C., Johnston M.O., Kelly J.K., Moeller D.A., Porcher E., Ree R.H., Vallejo-Marin M., Winn A.A. Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:35-43.
14. Ellstrand N.C., Elam D.R. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1993, 24:217-242.
15. Fernandez-M J.F., Sork V.L. Mating patterns of a subdivided population of the andean oak (Quercus humboldtii Bonpl., Fagaceae). J. Hered. 2005, 96:635-643.
16. Fore S.A., Hickey R.J., Vankat J.L., Guttman S.I., Schaefer R.L. Genetic structure after forest fragmentation: a landscape ecology perspective on Acer saccharum. Can. J. Bot. 1992, 70:1659-1668.
17. Frazer, G.W., Canham, C.D., Lertzman, K.P., 1999. Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York.
18. Goodnight, K.F., Queller, D.C., 1998. RELATEDNESS 5.0.8. Available at: http://www.gsoftnet.us/GSoft.html.
19. Griffin A.R., Lindgren D. Effect of inbreeding on production of filled seed in Pinus radiata: experimental results and a model of gene action. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1985, 71:334-343.
20. Hall P., Walker S., Bawa K. Effect of forest fragmentation on genetic diversity and mating system in a tropical tree, Pithecellobium elegans. Conserv. Biol. 1996, 10:757-768.
21. Hamrick J.L. Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 197:323-335.
22. Hastings A., Harrison S. Metapopulation dynamics and genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1994, 25:167-188.
23. Hill M.J., Senarath U., Lee A., Zeppel M., Nightingale J.M., Williams R.D.J., McVicar T.R. Assessment of the MODIS LAI product for Australian ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 101:495-518.
24. Hoebee S.E., Arnold U., Duggelin C., Gugerli F., Brodbeck S., Rotach P., Holderegger R. Mating patterns and contemporary gene flow by pollen in a large continuous and a small isolated population of the scattered forest tree Sorbus torminalis. Heredity 2007, 99:47-55.
25. Holsinger K.E. The evolutionary dynamics of fragmented plant populations. Biotic Interactions and Global Change 1993, 198-216. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass. P. Kareiva, J. Kingsolver, R. Huey (Eds.).
26. Jamieson A., Taylor S.C.S. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Anim. Genet. 1997, 28:397-400.
27. Jump A.S., Penuelas J. Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation in a wind-pollinated tree. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:8096-8100.
28. Ledig F.T. Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos 1992, 63:87-108.
29. Lee T.D. Patterns of fruit and seed production. Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies 1988, 179-202. Oxford University Press, New York. J.L. Doust, L.L. Doust (Eds.).
30. Manel S., Schwartz M.K., Luikart G., Taberlet P. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:189-197.
31. McCullagh P., Nelder J.A. Generalized Linear Models 1989, Chapman & Hall, London.
32. McGarigal K., Cushman S.A. Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12:335-345.
33. Mitchell F.J.G. How open were European primeval forests? Hypothesis testing using palaeoecological data. J. Ecol. 2005, 93:168-177.
34. Morgan J.W. Effects of population size on seed production and germinability in an endangered, fragmented grassland plant. Conserv. Biol. 1999, 13:266-273.
35. Nason J.D., Campbell D.R., Fernandez J.F. Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14:219-224.
36. Nason J.D., Hamrick J.L. Reproductive and genetic consequences of forest fragmentation: two case studies of Neotropical canopy trees. J. Hered. 1997, 88:264-276.
37. Nielsen L.R., Kjaer E.D. Gene flow and mating patterns in individuals of wych elm (Ulmus glabra) in forest and open land after the influence of Dutch elm disease. Conserv. Genet. 2010, 11:257-268.
38. O'Connell L.M., Mosseler A., Rajora O.P. Impacts of forest fragmentation on the mating system and genetic diversity of white spruce (Picea glauca) at the landscape level. Heredity 2006, 97:418-426.
39. Queller D.C., Goodnight K.F. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 1989, 43:258-275.
40. R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: http://www.r-project.org/.
41. Ritland K. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 2002, 88:221-228.
42. Robledo-Arnuncio J., Alia R., Gil L. Increased selfing and correlated paternity in a small population of a predominantly outcrossing conifer, Pinus sylvestris. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:2567-2577.
43. Robledo-Arnuncio J., Gil L. Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 2005, 94:13-22.
44. Scofield D.G., Schultz S.T. Mitosis, stature and evolution of plant mating systems: low-Phi and high-Phi plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:275-282.
45. Seltmann P., Cocucci A., Renison D., Cierjacks A., Hensen I. Mating system, outcrossing distance effects and pollen availability in the wind-pollinated treeline species Polylepis australis BITT (Rosaceae). Basic Appl. Ecol. 2009, 10:52-60.
46. Shaw D.V., Kahler A.L., Allard R.W. A multilocus estimator of mating system parameters in plant populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981, 78:1298-1302.
47. Smouse P.E., Robledo-Arnuncio J. Measuring the genetic structure of the pollen pool as the probability of paternal identity. Heredity 2005, 94:640-649.
48. Sork V.L., Smouse P.E. Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21:821-836.
49. Stuart G., Gries C., Hope D. The relationship between pollen and extant vegetation across an arid urban ecosystem and surrounding desert in Southwest USA. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:573-591.
50. Templeton A.R., Shaw K., Routman E., Davis S.K. The genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1990, 77:13-27.
51. Vendramin G.G., Lelli L., Rossi P., Morgante M. A set of primers for the amlification of 20 chloplast microsatellites in Pinaceae. Mol. Ecol. 1996, 5:595-598.
52. Wu, X., 2008. Analysis of pollen dispersal structure from seeds in Pinus Tabulaeformis by cpSSR: a case study in natural Pinus Tabulaeformis forest at Songshan National Nature Reserve. M.S. thesis. Beijing Normal University, Beijing, p. 69.
53. Wu Z. Vegetation of China 1995, Science Press, Beijing.
54. Xu H. Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. 1993, China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing.
55. Young A., Boyle T., Brown T. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996, 11:413-418.
56. Zhang D., Shen X., He T. A paternity analysis of seeds from different clones in a Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. seed orchard. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica 2001, 25:166-174.
57. Zhang H. The Research on the Reproductive System of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. Seed Orchard 2000, China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing.