The Processing of Invariant and Variant Face Cues in the Garner Paradigm

Emotion

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 563-571

  Karnadewi, Fika ^a   Lipp, Ottmar V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Emotion perception; Emotional expression; Face perception; Inversion; Race categorization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTIONALITY; FACE ASYMMETRY; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PROCESSING; RACE; SEX; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANGER; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; CUES; EMOTIONS; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HAPPINESS; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959301717     PISSN: 15283542     EISSN: 19311516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021333     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ackerman J.M., Shapiro J.R., Neuberg S.L., Kenrick D.T., Becker D.V., Griskevicius V., Schaller M. They all look the same to me (unless they're angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science 2006, 17:836-840.
2. Aguado L., Garcia-Gutierrez A., Serrano-Pedraza I. Symmetrical interaction of sex and expression in face classification tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71:9-25.
3. Atkinson A.P., Tipples J., Burt D.M., Young A.W. Asymmetric interference between sex and emotion in face perception. Perception and Psychophysics 2005, 67:1199-1213.
4. Beaupré M.G., Hess U. Cross-cultural emotion recognition among Canadian ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2005, 26:355-370.
5. Beaupré M.G., Hess U. An intergroup advantage for confidence in emotion recognition judgments: The moderating effect of familiarity with the expressions of outgroup members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32:16-26.
6. Becker D.V., Kenrick D.T., Neuberg S.L., Blackwell K.C., Smith D.M. The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92:179-190.
7. Bruce V., Young A. Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1986, 77:105-146.
8. Calder A.J., Burton A.M., Miller P., Young A.W., Akamatsu S. A principal component analysis of facial expressions. Vision Research 2001, 41:1179-1208.
9. Calder A.J., Young A.M., Keane J., Dean M. Configural information in facial expression perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:527-551.
10. Calder A.J., Young A.W. Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6:641-651.
11. Carey S., Diamond R. Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?. Visual Cognition 1994, 1:253-274.
12. Diamond R., Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986, 115:107-117.
13. Ekman P., Friesen W.V. Facial action coding system: A technique for the measurement of facial actions 1978, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
14. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. DMDX: A Window display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2003, 35:116-124.
15. Fox E., Damjanovic L. The eyes are sufficient to produce a threat superiority effect. Emotion 2006, 6:534-539.
16. Garner W.R. The processing of information and structure 1974, L. Erlbaum Associates, Protomac, MD.
17. George P.A., Hole G.J. Factors affecting the accuracy of age estimates of unfamiliar faces. Perception 1995, 24:1059-1073.
18. George P.A., Hole G.J. The influence of feature-based information in the age processing of unfamiliar faces. Perception 1998, 27:295-312.
19. Goshen-Gottstein Y., Ganel T. Repetition priming for familiar and unfamiliar faces in a sex-judgment task: Evidence for a common route for processing of sex and identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1198-1214.
20. Harrison V., Hole G. Evidence for a contact-based explanation of the own-age bias in face recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:264-269.
21. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 2000, 4:223-233.
22. Hugenberg K. Social categorization and the perception of facial affect: Target race moderates the response latency advantage for happy faces. Emotion 2005, 5:267-276.
23. Hugenberg K., Bodenhausen G.V. Facing prejudice: Implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat. Psychological Science 2003, 14:640-643.
24. Hugenberg K., Bodenhausen G.V. Ambiguity in social categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in face categorization. Psychological Science 2004, 15:342-345.
25. Hugenberg K., Sczesny S. On wonderful women and seeing smiles: Social categorization moderates the happy face response latency advantage. Social Cognition 2006, 24:516-539.
26. Jaquet E., Rhodes G. Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:101-112.
27. Juth P., Lundqvist D., Karlsson A., Öhman A. Looking for Foes and Friends: Perceptual and Emotional Factors When Finding a Face in the Crowd. Emotion 2005, 5(4):379-395.
28. Kubota J.T., Ito T.A. Multiple cues in social perception: The time course of processing race and facial expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007, 43:738-752.
29. Leder H., Bruce V. When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 53A:513-536.
30. Le Gal P.M., Bruce V. Evaluating the independence of sex and expression in judgments of faces. Perception and Psychophysics 2002, 64:230-243.
31. Levin D.T. Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1364-1382.
32. Lipp O.V., Price S.M., Tellegen C.L. No effect of inversion on attentional and affective processing of facial expressions. Emotion 2009, 9:248-259.
33. Little A.C., DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C. Sex-contingent face aftereffects suggest distinct neural population code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 2005, 272:1-5.
34. Lundqvist D., Litton J.E. The averaged Karolinska directed emotional faces-AKDEF [CD-ROM] 1998, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section, Stockholm.
35. Maurer D., Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:255-260.
36. Meissner C.A., Brigham J.C. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2001, 7:3-35.
37. Münte T.F., Brack M., Grootheer O., Wieringa B.M., Matzke M., Johannes S. Brain potentials reveal the timing of face identity and expression judgments. Neuroscience Research 1998, 30:25-34.
38. Ng M., Ciaramitaro V.M., Anstis S., Boynton G.M., Fine I. Selectivity for the configural cues that identify the gender, ethnicity, and identity of faces in human cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of United States of America 2006, 103:19552-19557.
39. Öhman A. Automaticity and the amygdala: Nonconscious responses to emotional faces. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002, 11:62-66.
40. Palermo R., Rhodes G. Are you always in my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:75-92.
41. Phelps E.A. Faces and races in the brain. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:775-776.
42. Quinn K.A., Macrae C.N. Categorzing others: The dynamics of person construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:467-479.
43. Schweinberger S.R., Soukup G.R. Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1748-1765.
44. Searcy J.H., Bartlett J.C. Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:904-915.
45. Sporer S.L. Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups. An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2001, 7:36-97.
46. Tanaka J.W., Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Experimental Psycholology 1993, 46A:225-245.
47. Tottenham N., Tanaka J., Leon A.C., McCarry T., Nurse M., Hare T.A., Nelson C.A. The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research 2009, 168:242-249.
48. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:141-145.
49. Zhao M., Hayward W.G. Holistic processing underlies gender judgments of faces. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 2010, 72:591-596.