Broadening our horizons: Toward a plurality of methodologies in learning disability research

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 107-121

  Connor, David J ^a   Gallagher, Deborah ^b   Ferri, Beth A ^c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

^c SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958789882     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073194871103400201     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Alonso, G., Anderson, N. S., Su, C., & Theoharis, J. (2009). Our schools suck: Students talk back to a segregated nation. New York, NY: New York University Press.
2. Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E. B., Trent, S. C., Osher, D., & Ortiz, A. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968-2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76(2), 279-299.
3. Arzubiaga, A. E., Artiles, A. J., King, K., & Harris-Murri, N. (2008). Beyond research on cultural minorities: Challenges and implications of research as situated cultural practice. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 309-327.
4. Barnes, C., Marcer, G., & Shakespeare, T. (Eds). (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
5. Baglieri, S., Valle, J. W., Connor, D. J., & Gallagher, D. (in press). Disability studies in education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. Remedial and Special Education.
6. Ballard, K. (1996). Paradigm lost and regained. In L. Heshusius & K. Ballard (Eds.), From positivism to interpretivism and beyond: Tales of transformation in educational and social research (pp. 26-31). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7. Barnes, C., Mercer, G., & Shakespeare, T. (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
8. Barnes, C., Oliver, M., & Barton, L. (Eds.). (2002). Disability studies today. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
9. Bejoian, L., & Reid, D. K. (2005). A disability studies perspective on the Bush Agenda: The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38(3), 220-231.
10. Bernstein, R. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
11. Biklen, D. P. (2005). Autism and the myth of the person alone. New York, NY: New York University Press.
12. Blatt, B., & Kaplan, F. (1966). Christmas in purgatory: A photographic essay on mental retardation. Syracuse, NY: Human Policy Press.
13. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, D. 1977). Handicappism. Social Policy, 7, 14-19.
14. Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. (1976). The judged, not the judges: An insider's view of mental retardation, American Psychologist, 31, 47-52.
15. Bordman, A. G., Argüelles, M. E., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Klingner, J. (2005). Special education teachers' views of research-based practices. Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 168-180. (Pubitemid 41616840)
16. Boudah, D. J., Logan, K. R., & Greenwood, C. R. (2001). The research to practice project: Lessons learned about changing teacher practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 290-303. (Pubitemid 33370079)
17. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195-207. (Pubitemid 40273035)
18. Brantlinger, E., Klingner, J., & Richardson, V. (2005). Importance of experimental as well as empirical qualitative studies in special education. Mental Retardation, 43(2), 91-119.
19. Bryan, T. (2005). Science-based advances in the social domain of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 119-121. (Pubitemid 40707339)
20. Carrier, J. (1986). Learning disability: Social class and the construction of inequality in American education. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
21. Collins, K. M. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child's struggle to be seen as competent. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
23. Connor, D. J. (20008). Urban narratives: Life at the intersections of learning disability, race, and social class. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
24. Danforth, S. (1997). On what basis hope? Modern progress and postmodern possibilities. Mental Retaration, 35(2), 93-106. (Pubitemid 27183845)
25. Danforth, S. (2006). From epistemology to democracy: Pragmatism and the reorientation of disability research. Remedial and Special Education, 27(6), 337-345.
26. Danforth, S. (2009). The incomplete child: An intellectual history of learning disabilities. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
27. Davis, L. (1995). Enforcing normalcy. London: Verso.
28. Davis, L. (Ed.). (1997). The disabilities studies reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
29. Denti, L., & Tefft-Cousin, P. (Eds.). (2001). New ways of looking at learning disabilities: Connections to classroom practice. Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
30. Dudley-Marling, C. (2004). The social construction of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 482-489. (Pubitemid 39603651)
31. Drame, E. R. (2002). Sociocultural context effects on teachers' readiness to refer for learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(1), 41-53.
32. Edgerton, R. B. (1967/1993). The cloak of competence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33. Ferri, B. A. (2009). Doing a (dis)service: Reimagining special education from a disability studies perspective. In W. Ayers, T. Quinn, & D. Stovall (Eds.), Handbook of social justice in education (pp. 417-430). New York, NY: Routledge.
34. Figueroa, R. A. (2005). Dificultades o desabilidades de aprendizaje. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 140-143.
35. Flatham, R. E. (2005). The bases, limits, and values of pluralism: An engagement with William James. Proceedings of the American Philosophy Society, 149(2), 159-198.
36. Gabel, S. L., & Danforth, S. (Eds.). (2008). Disability and the politics of education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
37. Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method (2nd ed.). (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Eds. & Trans.). New York, NY: Seabury Press.
38. Gallagher, D. (2006). If not absolute objectivity, then what? A reply to Kauffman and Sasso. Exceptionality, 14(2), 91-107.
39. Gersten, R., & Brengelman, S. U. (1996). The quest to translate research into classroom practice: The emerging knowledge base. Remedial and Special Education, 17(2), 67-74.
40. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylum. New York, NY: Penguin.
41. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
42. Granger, D. (2010). A tribute to my dyslexic body, as I travel in the form of a ghost. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(2). http://www.dsq-sds.org/ article/view/1236/1281
43. Greenwood, C. R., & Abbott, M. (2001). The research to practice gap in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(4), 276-289. (Pubitemid 33370078)
44. Guba, E. G. (1996). Commentary. In L. Heshusius & K. Ballard (Eds.), From positivism to interpretivism and beyond: Tales of transformation in educational and social research (pp. 121-127). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
45. Harry, B., & Klingner, J. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
46. Hahn, H., & Hegamin, A. P. (2001). Assessing scientific measures of disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12(2), 114-127.
47. Hehir, T., Figueroa, E., Gamm, S., Katman, L., Gruner, A., Karger, J., & Hernandez, J. (2005). Comprehension management review and evaluation of special education submitted to New York City Department of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Education.
48. Heshusius, L. (1982). At the heart of the advocacy dilemma: A mechanistic world view. Exceptional Children, 49(1), 6-13.
49. Heshusius, L. (1989). A Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and the contours of alternatives: An overview. In D. J. Gallagher, L. Heshusius, R. P. Iano, & T. M. Skrtic (Eds.), (2004), Challenging orthodoxy in special education: Dissenting voices. Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
50. Reprinted from Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(7), 402-415).
51. Heshusius, L. (2004). Special education knowledges: The inevitable struggle with the "self." In D. J. Gallagher, L. Heshusius, R. P. Iano, & T. M. Skrtic (Eds.), Challenging orthodoxy in special education: Dissenting voices (pp. 283-309). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
52. Heshusius, L., & Ballard, K. (1996a). How do we count the ways we know? Some background to the project. In L. Heshusius & K. Ballard (Eds.), From positivism to interpretivism and beyond: Tales of transformation in educational and social research (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
53. Heshusius, L., & Ballard, K. (Eds.) (1996b). From positivism to interpretivism and beyond: Tales of transformation in educational and social research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
54. Iano, R. P. (1986). The study and development of teaching: With implications for the advancement of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 7(5), 50-61.
55. Itard, J.M.G. (1806/1962). The wild boy of Aveyron. (G. Humphrey & M. Humphrey, Trans.). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
56. Kauffman, J. M. (1998). Are we all postmodern now? Behavioral Disorders, 23(3), 149-152.
57. Kauffman, J. M., & Sasso, G. M. (2006b). Certainty, doubt, and the reduction of uncertainty. Exceptionality, 14(2), 109-120.
58. Kauffman, J. M., & Sasso, G. M. (2006a). Toward ending cultural and cognitive relativism in special education. Exceptionality, 14(2), 65-90.
59. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1998). The politics of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 245-273. (Pubitemid 128182956)
60. Keefe, E. B., Moore, V. M., Duff, F. R. (2006). Listening to the experts: Students with disabilities speak out. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
61. Klassen, R. M., Krawchuck, L. L., Lynch, S. L., & Rajani, S. (2008). Procrastination and motivation of undergraduates with learning disabilities: A mixed methods inquiry. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(3), 137-147.
62. Kleibard, H. M. (1995). The struggle for American curriculum. New York, NY: Routledge.
63. Kohn, A. (1992). Resistance to cooperative learning: Making sense of its deletion and dilution. Journal of Education, 174(2), 38-56.
64. Kohn, A. (1993). Choices for children: Why and how to let students decide. Phi Delta Kappa, 75(1), 8-16, 18-21
65. Lee, C. M. (2005). Evolution. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 182-184. (Pubitemid 40707355)
66. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability. New York, NY: New York University Press.
67. Lloyd, J. W., & Hallahan, D. P. (2005). Going forward: How the field of learning disabilities has and will contribute to education. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 133-146.
68. Losen, D. J., & Orfield, G. (Eds.). (2002). Racial inequality in special education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
69. Lyon, R. G. (2005). Why scientific research must guide educational policy and instructional practices and learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 140-143.
70. Malouf, D. B., & Shiller, E. P. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414-424.
71. McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1998). Adam, Adam, Adam, and Adam: The cultural construction of learning disability. In H. Varenne & R. McDermott, Successful failure: The school America builds (pp. 25-44). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
72. Mercer, J. R. (1973). Labeling the mentally retarded: Clinical and social system perspectives on mental retardation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
73. Mooney, J. (2008). The short bus. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
74. Mostert, M. P., Kavale, K. A., & Kauffman, J. M. (2008). Challenging the refusal of reasoning in special education. Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
75. National Literacy Summit. (2000). Literacy skills for 21st-century America: A foundation for creating a more literate nation. Lila and DeWitt Wallace/Readers Digest Fund, Pleasantville, NY. (Report CE 081 044). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.proxy.lib.wayne.edu/PDFS/ED448284.pdf
76. Poplin, M. S. (1987). Self-imposed blindness: The scientific method in education. Remedial and Special Education, 8(6), 31-37.
77. Pugach, M. C. (2001). The stories we choose to tell: Fulfilling the promise of qualitative research for special education. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 439-453. (Pubitemid 33595791)
78. Purpel, D. (1998). Values education in the United States of America. In J. Stephenson, L. Ling, E. Burman, & M. Cooper (Eds.), Values in education (pp. 197-208). London: Routledge.
79. Reid, D. K., & Valle, J. W. (2004). The discursive construction of learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 466-481.
80. Reid, D. K., Robinson, S. J., & Brunson, T. D. (1995). Empiricism and beyond: Expanding the boundaries of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 131-141.
81. Rodis, P., Garrod, A., & Boscarddin, M. L. (Eds.). Learning disabilities and life stories. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
82. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84. Rourke, B. P. (2005). Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Past and future. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 111-114. (Pubitemid 40707337)
85. Rueda, R. (2005). Searching for the grand unifying theory: Reflections on the field of LD. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 168-170. (Pubitemid 40707351)
86. Sasso, G. M. (2001). The retreat from inquiry and knowledge in special education. Journal of Special Education, 34, 178-193.
87. Schwandt, T. (1996). Notes on being an interpretivist. In L. Heshusius & K. Ballard (Eds., 1996b), From positivism to interpretivism and beyond: Tales of transformation in educational and social research (pp. 77-84). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
88. Skrtic, T. (1991). Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture and school organization. Denver, CO: Love Publishers.
89. Skrtic, T. (2005). The political economy of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 149-155.
90. Slavin, R. E. (2008). What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14.
91. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidenced-based educational policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21.
92. Sleeter, C. E. (1987). Why is there learning disabilities? A critical analysis of the birth of the field in its social context. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), The foundations of school subjects (pp. 210-237). London: Palmer Press.
93. Smith, J. K. (1996). My transition to interpretive inquiry. In L. Heshusius & K. Ballard (Eds., 1996b), From positivism to interpretivism and beyond: Tales of transformation in educational and social research (pp. 85-90). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
94. Smith, T. J. (1997, April). Storying moral dimensions of disordering: Teacher inquiry into the social construction of severe emotional disturbance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
95. Stanovich, K. E. (2005). The future of a mistake: Will discrepancy measurement continue to make the learning disabilities a field of pseudoscience? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 103-104.
96. Synder, S., Brueggemann, B., & Garland Thomson, R. (Eds.). (2002). Disability studies: Enabling the humanities. New York, NY: Modern Language Association.
97. Tate, W. F., Ladson-Billings, G., & Grant, C. (1996). The Brown decision revisited: Mathematizing a social problem. In M. J. Shujaa (Ed.), Beyond desegregation: The politics of quality in African American schooling (pp. 29-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corvvin Press.
98. Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics, 15, 3-51.
99. Trent, S. C., Artiles, A. J., & Englert, C. S. (1998). From deficit thinking to social constructivism: A review of theory, research, and practice in special education. Review of Research in Education, 23, 277-307.
100. Thompson, D. (September, 2002). Power and distaste: Tolerance and its limitations. Paper presented at the Social Policy Research Centre, University of new South Wales.
101. Tomlinson, S. (2008). Race and education: Policy and politics in Britain. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
102. Trent, J. W. (1994). Inventing the feeble mind: A history of mental retardation in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
103. Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, ONT: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
104. Wong, J. (2010). Exploring the construction/deconstruction of learning disabilities in an urban school: Revisiting Sleeter's essay. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(2). Retrieved from http://www.dsq-sds.org/article/view/1242/1286.
105. Ysseldyke, J. (2005). Assessment and decision making for students with learning disabilities: What if this is as good as it gets? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(5), 125-128. (Pubitemid 40707341)