Assessing Scientific Measures of Disability

Journal of Disability Policy Studies

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 114-121

  Hahn, Harlan ^a   Pool Hegamin, Angela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996234038     PISSN: 10442073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104420730101200209     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Boshuizen, H. (1995). ICIDH in the calculation of health expectancy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17, 358-363.
2. Brandt, E.N., & Pope, A.M. (1997). Enabling America: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3. Chamie M. (1990). The status and use of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH). World Health Statistics Quarterly, 43, 273-280.
4. Crimmins, E. (1998). Summary report of workshop: Identifying summary measures for Healthy People 2010. University Park, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
5. Crimmins, E.M., Hayward, M.D., & Saito Y. (1994). Changing mortality and morbidity rates and the health status and life expectancy of the older population. Demography, 31, 159-175.
6. Dickson, H. (1996). Problems with the ICIDH definition of impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 18, 52-54.
7. Duckworth, D. (1995). The Canadian database on disability issues: A national application of the ICIDH, 17, 344-349.
8. Fougeyrollas, P., Noreau, L., Bergeron, H., Cloutier, R., Dion, S.A., & St. Michel, G. (1998). Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: Conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21(1), 127-141.
9. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Greenhalgh, T., & Taylor, R. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal, 315, 740-743.
11. Hahn, H. (1982). Disability and rehabilitation policy: Is paternalistic neglect really benign? Public Administration Review, 43, 385-388.
12. Hahn, H. (1984). The issue of equality: European perceptions of employment policy for disabled persons. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.
13. Hahn, H. (1985a). Disability policy and the problem of discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 293-318.
14. Hahn, H. (1985b). Toward a politics of disability: Definitions, disciplines, and policies. The Social Science Journal, 22, 87-105.
15. Hahn, H. (1986). Disability and the urban environment: A perspective on Los Angeles. Society and Space, 4, 273-288.
16. Hahn, H. (1987). Civil rights for disabled Americans: The foundations of a political agenda (pp. 181-203). In A. Gartner & T. Joe (Eds.), Images of disability/disabling images. New York: Praeger.
17. Hahn, H. (1993). The political implications of disability definitions and data. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 4, 41-52.
18. Hahn, H. (1994). The minority group model of disability: Implications for medical sociology (pp. 3-24). In R. Weitz & J. J. Kronenfeld (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Health Care. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
19. Hahn, H. (1997). An agenda for citizens with disabilities: Pursuing identity and empowerment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 9, 31-37.
20. Hahn, H. (2000). Accommodations and the ADA: Unreasonable bias or biased reasoning? Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 21, 166-192.
21. Halbertsma, J. (1996). H. G. Dickson's problems with the ICIDH definition of impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 18, 533-535.
22. Harris, L. (1986). The ICD survey of disabled Americans: Bringing disabled Americans into the mainstream. New York: Louis Harris and Associates.
23. Katz, S., Downs, T.D., Cash, H.R., & Grotz, R.E. (1970). Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist, 10(1), 20-30.
24. Lawton, M.P., & Brody, E.M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9, 179-186.
25. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
26. Minow, M. (1990). Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law. Ithaca: New York: Cornell University Press.
27. Murray, C.J.L., & Lopez, A.D. (1996). Evidence-based health policy: Lessons from the global burden of disease study. Science, 274, 740-743.
28. Nagi, S.Z. (1979). The concept and measurement of disability. In E. D. Berkowitz (Ed.), Disability policies and government programs. New York: Praeger.
29. Newman, I., & Benz, C.R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
30. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement: A sociological approach. New York: St. Martin's Press.
31. Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. New York: St. Martin's Press.
32. Pfeiffer, D. (1998). The ICIDH and the need for its revision. Disability and Society, 13, 503-523.
33. Philp, I., Armstrong, G.K., Coyle, G.G., Chadwick, I., & Machado, A. (1998). A better way to measure disability in older people. Journal of Age and Aging, 27, 519-522.
34. Pope, A.M., & Tarlov, A.R. (1991). Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Reynolds, S.L., Crimmins, E.M., & Saito Y. (1998). Cohort differences in disability and disease presence. Gerontologist, 38, 578-590.
36. Smith, W.J. (1997). Forced exit: The slippery slope from assisted suicide to legalized murder. New York: Random House.
37. Stolov, W.C., & Clowers, M.R. (1981). Handbook of severe disability: A text for rehabilitation counselors, other vocational practitioners, and allied health professionals. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, Rehabilitation, Services Administration.
38. Strnad, M., Mandic, V., & Rulnjevic, N. (1995). Croatian initial experience with the suitability of the ICIDH for classifying health status. Journal of Disability and Rehabilitation, 17, 364-368.
39. Thuriaux, M. (1995). The ICIDH: Evolution, status, and prospects. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17, 112-118.
40. U.S. Census Bureau. (1999, May). Census bureau data on disability [Online]. Available: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www./disable/intro.html
41. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1998). National Health Interview Survey on Disability, 1995: Phase I, Person and Condition Data. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics.
42. Van Hof, C., & Looijestijn, P. (1995). An interdisciplinary model for the rehabilitation of visually impaired and blind people: Application of the ICIDH concepts. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17, 391-399.
43. Vermeer, A. (1995). The consequences of asthma in terms of the ICIDH and the role of physical activities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17, 386-390.
44. Vez, J., Vader, J., & Paccaud, F. (1995). Cross-coding from the Swiss Disability Insurance listing to the ICIDH. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17, 369-376.
45. World Health Organization. (1980). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization.