Attention, exposure duration, and gaze shifting in naming performance

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 860-873

  Roelofs, Ardi ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attention; Exposure duration; Eye movements; Naming; Stroop

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; REFERENCE VALUE; STROOP TEST; TIME; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; STROOP TEST; TIME FACTORS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 79958714809     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021929     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Atchley P., Kramer A.F., Hillstrom A.P. Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attentional set for perceptual transients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:594-606.
2. Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Watson J.M. Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:495-523.
3. Besner D., Reynolds M., O'Malley S. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory period paradigm implies a bottleneck: Evidence from psycholinguistics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:2222-2234.
4. Besner D., Stolz J.A. What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6:99-104.
5. Besner D., Stolz J.A. Unconsciously controlled processing: The Stroop effect reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6:449-455.
6. Besner D., Stolz J.A., Boutilier C. The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4:221-225.
7. Broadbent D.E. Stimulus set and response set: Two kinds of selective attention. Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis 1970, 51-60. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. D.I. Mostofsky (Ed.).
8. Broadbent D.E. Decision and stress 1971, Academic Press, London.
9. Broadbent D.E., Gregory M. Stimulus set and response set: The alternation of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1964, 16:309-317.
10. Chen Z. Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:888-900.
11. De Jong R., Berendsen E., Cools R. Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. Acta Psychologica 1999, 101:379-394.
12. Di Russo F., Martinez A., Hillyard S.A. Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. Cerebral Cortex 2003, 13:486-499.
13. Duncan J. Selective attention in distributed brain areas. Cognitive neuroscience of attention 2004, 105-113. The Guilford Press, New York. M.I. Posner (Ed.).
14. Fischer B., Breitmeyer B. Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25:73-83.
15. Fischer B., Rampsperger E. Human express saccades: Extremely short reaction times of goal directed eye movements. Experimental Brain Research 1984, 57:191-195.
16. Garner W.R. The processing of information and structure 1974, Lawrence Erlbaum, Potomac, MD.
17. Glaser M.O., Glaser W.R. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1982, 8:875-894.
18. Glaser W.R., Glaser M.O. Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118:13-42.
19. Griffin Z.M. Why look? Reasons for eye movements related to language production. The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world 2004, 213-247. Psychology Press, Hove, United Kingdom. J.M. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
20. Kahneman D. Attention and effort 1973, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
21. Kahneman D., Henik A. Perceptual organization and attention. Perceptual organization 1981, 181-211. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M. Kubovy, J.R. Pomerantz (Eds.).
22. Kane M.J., Engle R.W. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:47-70.
23. Korvorst M., Roelofs A., Levelt W.J.M. Incrementality in naming and reading complex numerals: Evidence from eyetracking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:296-311.
24. Lachter J., Forster K.I., Ruthruff E. Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review 2005, 111:880-913.
25. Lachter J., Ruthruff E., Lien M.-C., McCann R.S. Is attention needed for word identification? Evidence from the Stroop paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2008, 15:950-955.
26. La Heij W., Kaptein N.A., Kalff A.C., de Lange L. Reducing color-color interference by optimizing selection for action. Psychological Research 1995, 57:119-130.
27. La Heij W., van der Heijden A.H.C., Plooij P. A paradoxical exposure-duration effect in the Stroop task: Temporal segregation between stimulus attributes facilitates selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:622-632.
28. Lamers M., Roelofs A. Role of Gestalt grouping in selective attention: Evidence from the Stroop task. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:1305-1314.
29. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:451-468.
30. Lavie N. Distracted or confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:75-82.
31. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:1-38.
32. Luce R.D. Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization 1986, Oxford University Press, New York.
33. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 109:163-203.
34. MacLeod C.M., MacDonald P.A. Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:383-391.
35. Meyer A.S., Roelofs A., Levelt W.J.M. Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:131-147.
36. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 1997, 104:3-65.
37. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review 1997, 104:749-791.
38. Miller J. The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics 1989, 45:567-571.
39. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 1999, 401:584-587.
40. Pashler H. The psychology of attention 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Paulitzki J.R., Risko E.F., O'Malley S., Stolz J.A., Besner D. On the role of set when reading aloud: A dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18:135-144.
42. Polk T.A., Drake R.M., Jonides J.J., Smith M.R., Smith E.E. Attention enhances the neural processing of attended features and suppresses the neural processing of unattended features in humans: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the Stroop task. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:13786-13792.
43. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R.R. Attention and cognitive control. Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium 1975, 55-85. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R.L. Solso (Ed.).
44. Ratcliff R. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:446-461.
45. Reichle E.D., Liversedge S.P., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:115-119.
46. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2003, 26:445-476.
47. Reynolds M., Besner D. Reading aloud is not automatic: Processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1303-1323.
48. Risko E.F., Stolz J.A., Besner D. Basic processes in reading: Is visual word recognition obligatory?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:119-124.
49. Roelfsema P.R., Lamme V.A.F., Spekreijse H. Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nature 1998, 395:376-381.
50. Roelofs A. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition 1992, 42:107-142.
51. Roelofs A. The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition 1997, 64:249-284.
52. Roelofs A. Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review 2003, 110:88-125.
53. Roelofs A. Attention and gaze control in picture naming, word reading, and word categorizing. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:232-251.
54. Roelofs A. Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: Analyses of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:303-323.
55. Roelofs A. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1580-1598.
56. Roelofs A. Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:353-368.
57. Roelofs A. Attention to spoken word planning: Chronometric and neuroimaging evidence. Language and Linguistics Compass 2008, 2:389-405.
58. Roelofs A. Attention and facilitation: Converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:411-422.
59. Roelofs A. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance. Acta Psychologica 2010, 133:146-153.
60. Roelofs A., Özdemir R., Levelt W.J.M. Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:900-913.
61. Roelofs A., Lamers M. Modelling the control of visual attention in Stroop-like tasks. Automaticity and control in language processing 2007, 123-142. Psychology Press, Hove, United Kingdom. A.S. Meyer, L.R. Wheeldon, A. Krott (Eds.).
62. Sanders A.F. Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill 1998, LEA, London.
63. Saslow M.G. Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency of saccadic eye movements. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1967, 57:1024-1029.
64. Stolz J.A., Besner D. The role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:1166-1177.
65. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18:643-662.
66. Treisman A.M. Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review 1969, 76:282-299.
67. Wertheimer M. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II [Laws of organization in perceptual forms]. Psychologische Forschung 1923, 4:301-350.
68. Winer B.J., Brown D.R., Michels K.M. Statistical principles in experimental design 1991, McGraw-Hill, New York.
69. Woodworth R.S. Experimental psychology 1938, Holt, New York.
70. Wright R.D., Ward L.M. Orienting of attention 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
71. Wundt W. Zur Kritik tachistoskopischer Versuche [A critique of tachistoscopic experiments]. Philosophische Studien 1900, 15:287-317.