Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 115-119

  Reichle, Erik D ^a   Liversedge, Simon P ^b   Pollatsek, Alexander ^c   Rayner, Keith ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; READING; WORD RECOGNITION;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 61349086120     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Reichle E.D., et al. The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: comparisons to other models. Behav. Brain Sci. 26 (2003) 445-476
2. Inhoff A.W., et al. The time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31 (2005) 979-995
3. Pollatsek A., et al. Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a reply to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005). J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32 (2006) 1485-1489
4. Inhoff A.W., et al. Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: a reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, & Rayner (2006). J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32 (2006) 1490-1495
5. Pollatsek A., et al. Attention to one word at a time is still a viable hypothesis: a reply to Inhoff, Radach, and Eiter (2006). J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32 (2006) 1496-1500
6. Radach R., et al. Models of oculomotor control in reading: towards a theoretical foundation of current debates. In: Van Gompel R.P.G., et al. (Ed). Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain (2007), Elsevier 237-270
7. Rayner K., and Juhasz B. Eye movements in reading: old questions and new directions. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 16 (2004) 340-352
8. Starr M.S., and Rayner K. Eye movements during reading: some current controversies. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5 (2001) 156-163
9. Engbert R., et al. SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychol. Rev. 112 (2005) 777-813
10. Richter E.M., et al. Current advances in SWIFT. Cogn. Syst. Res. 7 (2006) 23-33
11. Reilly R., and Radach R. Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cogn. Syst. Res. 7 (2006) 34-55
12. Just M.A., and Carpenter P.A. A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychol. Rev. 87 (1980) 329-354
13. Rayner K., and Pollatsek A. The Psychology of Reading (1989), Erlbaum
14. Salvucci D.D. An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding. Cogn. Syst. Res. 1 (2001) 201-220
15. Reichle E.D., et al. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychol. Rev. 105 (1998) 125-157
16. Kennedy A. The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time. In: Underwood G. (Ed). Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception (1998), Elsevier 149-180
17. Kennedy A., et al. Parafoveal pragmatics revisited. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 16 (2004) 128-153
18. Murray W.S. Parafoveal pragmatics. In: Underwood G. (Ed). Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception (1998), Elsevier 181-200
19. Atkinson R.C., and Shiffrin R.M. Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence K., and Spence J. (Eds). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory Vol. 2 (1968), Academic Press 742-775
20. McClelland J.L., et al. The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In: Rumelhart D.E., and McClelland J.L. (Eds). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition Vol. 1 (1986), MIT Press 3-44
21. Mesulam M.M. From sensation to cognition. Brain 121 (1998) 1013-1052
22. Churchland P.S., and Sejnowski T.J. The Computational Brain (1992), MIT Press
23. Reicher G.M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. J. Exp. Psychol. 81 (1969) 274-280
24. Rumelhart D.E., and McClelland J.L. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychol. Rev. 89 (1982) 60-94
25. Wheeler D.D. Processes in word recognition. Cognit. Psychol. 1 (1970) 59-85
26. Rayner, K. et al. (2009) Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on Kennedy and Pynte (2008) Vision Res. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.013 (In press)
27. Kliegl R., et al. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 135 (2006) 12-35
28. Rayner K., et al. Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136 (2007) 520-529
29. Irwin D.E. Lexical processing during saccadic eye movements. Cognit. Psychol. 36 (1998) 1-27
30. Kintsch W., and van Dijk T.A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychol. Rev. 85 (1978) 363-394
31. Pollatsek A., and Rayner K. Is covert attention really unnecessary?. Behav. Brain Sci. 22 (1999) 695-696
32. Clifton C., et al. Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In: van Gompel R.P.G., et al. (Ed). Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain (2007), Elsevier 341-371
33. Reichle E.D., et al. Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher-level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16 (2009) 1-21
34. th Bartlett memorial lecture. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 40A (1988) 201-237
35. Treisman A., and Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12 (1980) 97-136
36. Wolfe J.M. Guided Search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1 (1994) 202-238
37. Reichle E.D., et al. Serial or parallel? Using depth-of-processing to examine attention allocation during reading. Vision Res. 48 (2008) 1831-1836
38. Rayner K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognit. Psychol. 7 (1975) 65-81
39. White S.J., et al. Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: a re-examination. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12 (2005) 891-896
40. Hyönä J., et al. Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement display change study. Mem. Cognit. 32 (2004) 523-532
41. Pollatsek A., et al. Tests of the E-Z Reader model: exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognit. Psychol. 52 (2006) 1-56
42. Liversedge S.P., et al. Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?. Vision Res. 44 (2004) 1013-1024
43. Rayner K., et al. Eye movements when reading disappearing text: the importance of the word to the right of fixation. Vision Res. 46 (2005) 310-323
44. Ans B., et al. A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychol. Rev. 105 (1998) 678-723
45. Coltheart M., et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition. Psychol. Rev. 108 (2001) 204-256
46. Plaut D.C., et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychol. Rev. 103 (1996) 56-115
47. Seidenberg M.S., and McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol. Rev. 96 (1989) 525-568
48. Rayner K., et al. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30 (2004) 720-732
49. Reilly R., and O'Regan J.K. Eye movement control during reading: a simulation of some word-targeting strategies. Vision Res. 38 (1998) 303-317
50. McDonald S.A., et al. An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Psychol. Rev. 112 (2005) 814-840
51. Feng G. Eye movements as time-series random variables: a stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Cogn. Syst. Res. 7 (2006) 70-95
52. Yang S.-N. A oculomotor-based model of eye movements in reading: the competition/activation model. Cogn. Syst. Res. 7 (2006) 56-69
53. Rayner K., et al. Extending the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control to Chinese readers. Cogn. Sci. 31 (2007) 1021-1033