Intergroup peer assessment in problem-based learning tutorials for undergraduate Pharmacy students

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Kritikos, Vicky S ^a   Woulfe, Jim ^a   Sukkar, Maria B ^a   Saini, Bandana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Peer assessment; Pharmacy students; Problem based learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957938979     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe75473     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Blouin RA, Joyner PU, Pollack GM. Preparing for a Renaissance in pharmacy education: the need, opportunity, and capacity for change. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):Article 42.
2. Holland RW, Nimmo CM. Transitions, part 1: beyond pharmaceutical care. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999;56(17):1758-1764.
3. Roberts AS, Benrimoj SI, Chen TF, Williams KA, Aslani P. Implementing cognitive services in community pharmacy: a review of facilitators. Int J Pharm Pract. 2006;14:163-170.
4. Reid LD, Posey LM. The changing face of pharmacy. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2006;46(3):320-321.
5. Dolovich L, Pottie K, Kaczorowski J, et al. Integrating family medicine and pharmacy to advance primary care therapeutics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;83(6):913-917.
6. Marriott JL, Nation RL, Roller L, Costelloe M, Galbraith K, Stewart P, Charman WN. Pharmacy education in the context of Australian practice. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(6):Article 131.
7. Hubball H, Burt H. Learning outcomes and program-level evaluation in a four-year undergraduate pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(5):Article 90.
8. Beck DE. Where will we be tomorrow? We need a 2020 vision. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(2):208.
9. Accreditation Standards and Guidelines for the Professional Program in Pharmacy Leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree. The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, Chicago, IL 2006. http:/www.acpe-accredit.org/standards/default.asp (Last accessed: October 10, 2010).
10. Kelson AC, Distlehorst LH. Groups in problem-based learning (PBL): essential elements in theory and practice. In: DH Everson, CE Hmelo (eds.), Problem-Based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
11. Eva KW. Assessing tutorial-based assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2001;6(3):243-257.
12. Falchikov N. Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Innovat Educ Teach Int. 1995;32(2):175-187.
13. Falchikov N. Involving students in assessment. Psych Learn Teach. 2003;3(2):102-108.
14. Falchikov N. Group process analysis: self and peer assessment of working together in a group. Educ Tech Train Int. 1993;30:275-284.
15. Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J. Peer learning and assessment. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 1999;24(4):413-426.
16. Dochy F, Segers M, Sluijsmans D. The use of self-, peer and coassessment in higher education: a review. Stud Higher Educ. 1999;24(3):331-350.
17. Ballantyne R, Hughes K, Mylonas A. Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 2002;27(5):427-441.
18. Vickerman P. Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: an attempt to deepen learning? Asses Eval Higher Educ. 2008;1:1-10.
19. Papinczak T, Young L, GrovesM. Peer assessment in problem-based learning: a qualitative study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2007;12:169-186.
20. McDowell L. The impact of innovative assessment on student learning. Innovat Educ Train Int. 1995;32(4):302-313.
21. Hanrahan SJ, Isaacs G. Assessing self- and peer-assessment: the students' views. Higher Educ Res Dev. 2001;20(1):53-70.
22. Searby M, Ewers T. An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the school of music. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 1997;22(4):371-383.
23. Somervell H. Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: the case for self-, peer- and collaborative assessment. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 1993;18(3):221-233.
24. Topping KJ, Smith EF, Swanson I, Elliot A. Formative peer assessment of academic writing between post graduate students. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 2000;25(2):149-166.
25. Topping K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev Educ Res. 1998;68(3):249-276.
26. Papinczak T, Young L, Groves M, Haynes M. An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials. Med Teacher. 2007;29:122-132.
27. Boud D. Enhancing Learning Through Self-Assessment. London: Kogan Page, 1995.
28. Gielen S, Dochy F, Onghena P. An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 2010;1:1-19.
29. Bloom BS (Ed). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook1: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: McKay, 1956.
30. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1993;250:777-781.
31. Westberg J, Jason H. Collaborative Clinical Education: The Foundation of Effective Health Care. New York: Springer Publishing, 1993.
32. Gatfield T. Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 1999;24(4):365-377.
33. Magin D. Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work. Stud Higher Educ. 2001;26(1):53-63.
34. Orsmond P, Merry S. The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 1996;21(3): 239-250.
35. Swanson D, Case S, VanderVleuten C. Strategies for student assessment. In: Boud D, Feletti G, eds. The Challenge of Problem Based Learning. London: Kogan Page, 1991.
36. Prins FJ, Sluijsmans DMA, Kirschner PA, Strijbos J. Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: a case study. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 2005;30(4):417-444.
37. Higgins-Opitz SB, Tufts M. Student perceptions of the use of presentations as a method of learning endocrine and gastrointestinal pathophysiology. Adv Physiol Educ. 2010;43(2):75-85.
38. Cheng W, Warren M. Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Stud Higher Educ. 1997;22(2):233-240.