Decision making under risk and uncertainty

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 1, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 736-749

  Johnson, Joseph G ^a   Busemeyer, Jerome R ^b  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957495817     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.76     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. Goldstein WM, Weber EU. Content and discontent: Indications and implications of domain specificity in preferential decision making. In: Busemeyer JR, Hastie R, Medin DL, eds. Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 32. New York: Academic Press; 1995, 83-136.
2. Zsambok CE, Klein GA, eds. Naturalistic Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1997.
3. Bernoulli D. Specimen theorie novae de mensura sortis [Exposition of a new theory of the measurement of risk]. Econometrica 1738/1954, 22:23-36.
4. Savage LJ. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1954.
5. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1944.
6. Ramsey, FP. Truth and probability. The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays: Routledge& Kegan Paul; 1931.
7. de Finetti B. Foresight: its logical laws, its subjective sources. In: Kyburg H, Smokler H, eds. Studies in Subjective Probability: New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1937/1964.
8. Allais M. Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l'́ecole AmØricaine [The behavior of the rational man facing risk: Critique of the postulates and axioms of the American school]. Econometrica 1953, 21:503-546.
9. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1976.
10. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-292.
11. Markowitz HM. Portfolio Selection. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1959.
12. EdwardsW. Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. Psychol Rev 1962, 69:109-135.
13. Gonzalez R, Wu G. On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognit Psychol 1999, 38:129-166.
14. Brandstätter E, Kü hberger A, Schneider F. A cognitiveemotional account of the shape of the probability weighting function. J Behav Decision Making 2002, 15:79-100.
15. Dougherty MRP, Gettys CF, Ogden EE. MINERVADM: a memory process model for judgments of likelihood. Psychol Rev 1999, 106:108-209.
16. Johnson JG, Busemeyer JR. Process weighting model. Unpublished manuscript [under review], 2009.
17. Fox CR, Tversky A. A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Manage Sci 1998, 44:879-895.
18. Fox CR. Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty. Cognit Psychol 1999, 38:167-189.
19. Tversky A, Fox CR. Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychol Rev 1995, 102:269-283.
20. Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility. J Econ Behav Org 1982, 3:323-343.
21. YaariME. The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 1987, 55:95-115.
22. Starmer C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J Econ Lit 2000, 38:332-382.
23. Birnbaum MH, McIntosh WR. Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles. Organ Behav Hum Dec 1996, 67:91-110.
24. Luce, RD. Utility of Gains and Losses: Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
25. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representations of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 1992, 5:297-323.
26. Birnbaum MH. New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psychol Rev 2008, 115:463-501.
27. BirnbaumMH, Navarette JB. Testing descriptive utility theories: violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence. J Risk Uncertain 1998, 17:49-78.
28. Birnbaum MH, Chavez A. Tests of theories of decision making: violations of branch independence and distribution independence. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1997, 71:161-194.
29. BirnbaumMH, Sutton SE. Scale convergence and utility measurement. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1992, 52:183-215.
30. Birnbaum MH, Stegner SE. Source credibility in social judgment: bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. J Pers Soc Psychol 1979, 37:48-74.
31. Birnbaum MH, Parducci A, Gifford RK. Contextual effects in information integration. J Exp Psychol 1971, 88:158-170.
32. Bell DE. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper Res 1982, 30:961-981.
33. Loomes G, Sugden R. Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ J Nepal 1982, 92:805-824.
34. Epstude K, Roese NJ. The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2008, 12:168-192.
35. Mellers BA, Schwartz A, Ho K, Ritov I. Decision affect theory: emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychol Sci 1997, 8:423-429.
36. Lopes LL. Between hope and fear: the psychology of risk. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 1987, 20:255-295.
37. Lopes LL. Algebra and process in the modeling of risky choice. In: Busemeyer J, Hastie R, Medin DL, eds. Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1995, 177-220.
38. Busemeyer JR, Johnson JG. Computational models of decision making. In: Kohler DJ, Harvey N, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2004, 133-154.
39. Shah AK, Oppenheimer DM. Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework. Psychol Bull 2008, 134:207-222.
40. Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychol Rev 1972, 79:281-299.
41. Rieskamp J, Busemeyer JR, Mellers BA. Extending the bounds of rationality: evidence and theories of preferential choice. J Econ Lit 2006, 44:631-661.
42. Thorngate W. Efficient decision heuristics. Behav Sci 1980, 25:219-225.
43. Coombs C, Dawes R, Tversky A. Mathematical Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1970.
44. Dawes RH, Corrigan B. Linear models in decision making. Psychol Bull 1974, 81:95-106.
45. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. Behavioral decision research: a constructive processing perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 1992, 43:87-131.
46. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. The AdaptiveDecision Maker. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
47. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, the ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics that make us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
48. Brandstätter E, Gigerenzer G, Hertwig R. Risky choice with heuristics: Reply to Birnbaum (2008), Johnson, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, and Willemsen (2008), and Rieger and Wang (2008). Psychol Rev 2008, 115:281-290.
49. Ratcliff R, Smith PL. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychol Rev 2004, 111:333-367.
50. Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT. Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychol Rev 1993, 100:432-459.
51. Roe RM, Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT. Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision-making. Psychol Rev 2001, 108:370-392.
52. Busemeyer JR, Diederich A. Survey of decision field theory. Math Soc Sci 2002, 43:345-370.
53. Busemeyer JR, Johnson JG. Micro-process models of decision making. In: Sun R, ed. Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2008, 302-321.
54. Busemeye JR, Jessup RK, Johnson JG. Townsend JTBuilding bridges between neural models and complex human decision making behavior. Neural Networks 2006, 19:1047-1058.
55. Diederich A. Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. J Math Psychol 1997, 41:260-274.
56. Johnson JG, Busemeyer JR. A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena. Psychol Rev 2005, 112:841-861.
57. Pleskac TJ, Busemeyer JR. Two-Stage Dynamic Signal Detection: A theory of confidence, choice, and response time. Psychological Review, 2009 In press.
58. Diederich A. MDFT account of decision making under time pressure. Psychon Bull Rev 2003, 10:157-166.
59. Johnson JG, Busemeyer JR. Rule-based Decision Field Theory: a dynamic computational model of transitions among decision-making strategies. In: Betsch T, Haberstroh S, eds. The Routines of Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005, 3-20.
60. Gao G, Lee JD. Extending the decision field theory to model operator's reliance on automation in supervisory control systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2006, 36:943-959.
61. Lee S, Son Y, Jin J. Integrated human decision making and planning model for evacuation scenarios under BDI framework. ACM Trans Model Comput Simulation (in press).
62. Usher M, McClelland JL. Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamic models of multi-alternative choice. Psychol Rev 2004, 111:757-769.
63. Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT, Diederich A, Barkan R. Contrast effects or loss aversion? Comment on M. Usher, J. L. McClelland's. (2004). 'Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multi-alternative choice.' Psychol Rev 2005, 112:253-255.
64. Thagard P, Millgram E. Inference to the best plan: a coherence theory of decision. In: Ram A, Leake DB, eds. Goal-driven Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995, 439-454.
65. Guo FY, Holyoak KJ. Understanding similarity in choice behavior: A connectionist model. In: Gray W, Schunn C, eds. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002, 393-398.
66. Holyoak KJ, Simon D. Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. J Exp Psychol Gen 1999, 128:3-31.
67. Simon D, Krawczyk DC, Holyoak KJ. Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychol Sci 2004, 15:331-336.
68. Glöckner A, Betsch T. Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgm Decis Mak 2008, 3:215-228.
69. Glöckner A, Betsch T, Schindler N. Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. J Behav Decision Making (in press).
70. Montgomery H. From cognition to action: the search for dominance in decision making. In: Montgomery H, Svenson O, eds. Process and Structure in Human Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989, 23-49.
71. Svenson O. Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: a frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1992, 80:143-168.
72. Hastie R, Park B. The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment is memorybased or on-line. Psychol Rev 1986, 93:258-268.
73. Weber EU, Goldstein WM, Barlas S. And let us not forget memory: the role of memory processes and techniques in judgment and choice. In: Busemeyer JR, Hastie R, Medin DL, eds. Decision Making from the Perspective of Cognitive Psychology. Psychology of Learning and Motivation Series. New York: Academic Press; 1995.
74. Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G. Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. Psychol Rev 2002, 109:75-90.
75. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Extension versus intuititve reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychol Rev 1983, 90:293-315.
76. Weber EU, Johnson EJ. Constructing preferences from memories. In: Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, eds. The Construction of New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 2006, 397-410.
77. Johnson EJ, Haubl G, Keinan A. Aspects of endowment: a query theory of value construction. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2007, 33:461-474.
78. Myung IJ. The importance of complexity in model selection. J Math Psychol 2000, 44:190-204.
79. Pitt MA,Myung IJ.When a good fit can be bad. Trends Cogn Sci 2002, 6:421-425.
80. Roberts S, Pashler H. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychol Rev 2000, 107:358-367.
81. Hastie R. Problems for judgment and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 2001, 52:653-683.
82. McFadden D. Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice. In:Manski C andMcFadden D, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1981.
83. Sloman SA. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol Bull 1996, 119:3-22.
84. Sloman SA. Two systems of reasoning. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
85. Kahneman D, Frederick S. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002, 49-81.
86. Stanovich KE, West RF. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav Brain Sci 2000, 23:645-665.
87. Shiffrin RM, Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychol Rev 1977, 84:127-190.
88. Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Emotion, decision making, and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2000, 10:295-307.
89. Damasio AR. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam; 1994.
90. Lowenstein G, Lerner J. The role of emotion in decision making. In: Davidson RJ, Goldsmith HH, Scherer KR, eds. Handbook of Affective Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
91. Zajonc RB. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am Psychol 1980, 35:151-175.
92. Rangel A, Camerer C, Montague PR. A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decisionmaking. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:545-556.
93. Camerer C, Lowenstein G, Prelec D. Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. J Econ Lit 2005, 43:9-64.
94. Gold JI, Shadlen MN. Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. Nature 2000, 404:390-394.
95. Sanfey AG, Loewenstein G, McClure SM, Cohen JD. Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10:108-116.
96. Platt ML, Glimcher PW. Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature 1999, 400:233-238.
97. Sanfey AG. Neural computations of decision utility. Trends Cogn Sci 2004, 8:519-521.
98. Tom S, Fox CR, Trepel C, Poldrack RA. The neural basis of loss aversion in decision making under risk. Science 2007, 315:515-518.
99. Schall JD. Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001, 2:33-42.
100. Smith PL, Ratcliff R. Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neurosci 2004, 27:161-168.
101. Ratcliff R, Cherian A, Segraves M. A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of simple twochoice decisions. J Neurophysiol 2003, 90:1392-1407.
102. Schall JD. Neural correlates of decision processes: eural and mental chronometry. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003, 13:182-186.
103. Svenson O. Decision making and the search for fundamental psychological regularities: What can be learned from a process perspective? Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1996, 65:252-267.
104. Coombs CH. A Theory ofData. NewYork, NY:Wiley; 1964.
105. Fishburn PC. Utility theory. Management Science 1968, 14:335-378.
106. Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G, Hertwig R. The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. Psychol Rev 2006, 113:409-432.
107. Busemeyer JR, Jessup RK, Johnson JG, Townsend JT. Building bridges between neural models and complex decision making behavior. Neural Netw 2006, 19:1047-1058.
108. Gold JI, Shadlen MN. The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 2007, 30:535-574.
109. Koehler D, Harvey N, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science; 2004.
110. Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, eds. The Construction of Preference. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006