Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 91-110

  Birnbaum, Michael H ^a   McIntosh, William Ross ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042056719     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0067     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allais, M. (1979). The foundations of a positive theory of choice involving risk and a criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American School. In M. Allais & O. Hagen (Eds.), Expected utility hypothesis and the Allais paradox (pp. 27-145). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
2. Birnbaum, M. H. (1972). Morality judgments: Tests of an averaging model. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 35-42.
3. Birnbaum, M. H. (1973). Morality judgment: Test of an averaging model with differential weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 395-399.
4. Birnbaum, M. H. (1974). The nonadditivity of personality impressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 543-561.
5. Birnbaum, M. H. (1982). Controversies in psychological measurement. In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement (pp. 401-485). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). Issues in utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 319-330.
7. Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). Violations of monotonicity and contextual effects in choice-based certainty equivalents. Psychological Science, 3, 310-314.
8. Birnbaum, M. H., & Beeghley, D. (in press). Violations of branch independence in judgments of the value of gambles. Psychological Science.
9. Birnbaum, M. H., Coffey, G., Mellers, B. A., & Weiss, R. (1992). Utility measurement: Configural-weight theory and the judge's point of view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 331-346.
10. Birnbaum, M. H., & Jou, J. W. (1990). A theory of comparative response times and "difference" judgments. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 184-210.
11. Birnbaum, M. H., & Mellers, B. A. (1983). Bayesian inference: Combining base rates with opinions of sources who vary in credibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 792-804.
12. Birnbaum, M. H., Parducci, A., & Gifford, R. K. (1971). Contextual effects in information integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 158-170.
13. Birnbaum, M. H., & Sotoodeh, Y. (1991). Measurement of stress: Scaling the magnitudes of life changes. Psychological Science, 2, 236-243.
14. Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 48-74.
15. Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1981). Measuring the importance of cues in judgment for individuals: Subjective theories of IQ as a function of heredity and environment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 159-182.
16. Birnbaum, M. H., & Sutton, S. E. (1992). Scale convergence and utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 183-215.
17. Birnbaum, M. H., & Thompson, L. A. (in press). Violations of monotonicity in choices between gambles and certain cash. American Journal of Psychology.
18. Birnbaum, M. H., Thompson, L. A., & Bean, D. J. (in press). Tests of interval independence vs. configural weighting using judgments of strength of preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
19. Birnbaum, M. H., Wong, R., & Wong, L. (1976). Combining information from sources that vary in credibility. Memory & Cognition, 4, 330-336.
20. Birnbaum, M. H., & Zimmermann, J. (1995, February). The Savage Memorial Lecture: Exploring the mind of Bob Citron. Paper presented at the Bayesian Research Meetings, Studio City, CA.
21. Champagne, M., & Stevenson, M. K. (1994). Contrasting models of appraisal judgments for positive and negative purposes using policy modeling. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 93-123.
22. Cohen, M., & Jaffray, J.-Y. (1988). Is Savage's independence axiom a universal rationality principle? Behavioral Science, 33, 38-47.
23. Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380-417.
24. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643-649.
25. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
26. Krantz, D. H., Luce, D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement. New York: Academic Press.
27. Lopes, L. (1990). Re-modeling risk aversion: A comparison of Bernoullian and rank dependent value approaches. In G. M. von Furstenberg (Eds.), Acting under uncertainty (pp. 267-299). Boston: Kluwer.
28. Luce, R. D. (1992). Where does subjective expected utility fail descriptively? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 5-27.
29. Luce, R. D., & Fishburn, P. C. (1991). Rank-and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first order gambles. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 29-59.
30. Luce, R. D., & Fishburn, P. C. (1995). A note on deriving rank-dependent utility using additive joint receipts. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 11, 5-16.
31. Luce, R. D., & Narens, L. (1985). Classification of concatenation measurement structures according to scale type. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 1-72.
32. Mellers, B. A., Berretty, P. M., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1995). Dominance violations in judged prices of two-and three-outcome gambles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8, 201-216.
33. Mellers, B. A., Chang, S., Birnbaum, M. H., & Ordóñez, L. (1992). Preferences, prices, and ratings in risky decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 347-361.
34. Mellers, B. A., Ordóńez, L., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). A change-of-process theory for contextual effects and preference reversals in risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 331-369.
35. Miyamoto, J. M. (1989). Generic utility theory: measurement foundations and applications in multiattribute utility theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 357-404.
36. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 324-345.
37. Riskey, D. R., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1974). Compensatory effects in moral judgment: Two rights don't make up for a wrong. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 171-173.
38. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
39. Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57, 571-587.
40. Schoemaker, P. J. (1982). The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations. Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 529-563.
41. Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1974). Who accepts Savage's axiom? Behavioral Science, 19, 368-373.
42. Stevenson, M. K., Busemeyer, J. R., & Naylor, J. C. (1991). Judgment and decision-making theory. In M. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), New handbook of industrial-organizational psychology (pp. 283-374). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
43. Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Stevenson, M. K. (1994). Predicting the strength of preference for labor contracts using policy modeling. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 253-289.
44. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
45. Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299.
46. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
47. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371-384.
48. Varey, C. A., Mellers, B. A., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1990). Judgments of proportions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 613-625.
49. von Winterfeldt, D., Chung, N., Luce, R. D., & Cho, Y. (in press). Tests of consequence monotonicity in decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
50. Wakker, P. (1993). Additive representations on rank-ordered sets II. The topological approach. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 22, 1-26.
51. Wakker, P. (1994). Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory and decision, 36, 1-44.
52. Wakker, P., Erev, I., & Weber, E. U. (1994). Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 195-230.
53. Weber, E. U., & Kirsner, B. (in press). Reasons for rank-dependent utility evaluation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
54. Weber, E. U. (1994). From subjective probabilities to decision weights: The effects of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 228-242.
55. Weber, E. U., Anderson, C. J., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). A theory of perceived risk and attractiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 492-523.
56. Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. (in press). Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Science.
57. Yaari, M. E. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55, 95-115.