Extending the decision field theory to model operators’ reliance on automation in supervisory control situations

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 943-959

  Gac, Ji ^a   Lee, John D ^a  

^a IA United States   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; decision making; reliance on automation; supervisory control; trust in automation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008024047     PISSN: 10834427     EISSN: 15582426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSMCA.2005.855783     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. J. D. Lee and N. Moray, “Trust, control strategies, and allocation of function in human-machine systems,” Ergonomics, vol. 35, no. 10, pp.1243-1270, 1992.
2. R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua, “Automation and human performance. Theory and applications,” in Human Factors in Transportation, B. Kantowitz, Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996, p. 514.
3. R. Parasuraman and V. Riley, “Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse,” Hum. Factors, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 230–253, 1997.
4. R. Parasuraman, T. B. Sheridan, and C. D. Wickens, “A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 286–297, May 2000.
5. T. B. Sheridan, Humans and Automation. New York: Wiley, 2002.
6. A. Kirlik, R. A. Miller, and R. J. Jagacinski, “Supervisory control in a dynamic and uncertain environment: A process model of skilled human-environment interaction,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 929–952, Jul.-Aug. 1993.
7. T. B. Sheridan and R. Parasuraman, “Human versus automation in responding to failures: An expected-value analysis,” Hum. Factors, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 403–407, 2000.
8. F. P. Gibson, M. Fichman, and D. C. Plaut, “Learning in dynamic decision tasks: Computational model and empirical evidence,” Org. Behav. Human Decis. Process., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–35, 1997.
9. S. Farrell and S. Lewandowsky, “A connectionist model of complacency and adaptive recovery under automation,” J. Exper. Psychol., Learn., Mem., Cogn., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 395–410, 2000.
10. G. F. Loewenstein, E. U. Weber, C. K. Hsee, and N. Welch, “Risk as feelings,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 267–286, 2001.
11. A. Bechara, H. Damasio, D. Tranel, and A. R. Damasio, “Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy,” Science, vol. 275, no. 5304, pp. 1293–1295, 1997.
12. R. pp. J. Dolan, “Emotion, cognition, and behavior,” Science, vol. 298, no.5596, pp. 1191–1194, 2002.
13. J. D. Lee and K. A. See, “Trust in technology: Designing for appropriate reliance,” Hum. Factors, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 50–80, 2004.
14. N. Moray and T. Inagaki, “Laboratory studies of trust between humans and machines in automated systems,” Trans. Inst. Meas. Control, vol. 21, no. 4/5, pp. 203–211, 1999.
15. B. M. Muir, “Trust in automation 1: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems,” Ergonomics, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1905–1922, 1994.
16. V. Riley, “A theory of operator reliance on automation,” in Human Performance in Automated Systems: Recent Research and Trends, M. Mouloua and R. Parasuraman, Eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994, pp. 8–14.
17. M. S. Cohen, R. Parasuraman, and J. Freeman, “Trust in decision aids: A model and its training implications,” in Proc. Command and Control Research and Technology Symp., Monterey, CA, 1998, pp. 1–37.
18. J. D. Lee and N. Moray, “Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation,” Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud., vol. 40, no. 1, pp.153-184, 1994.
19. B. M. Muir and N. Moray, “Trust in automation 2: Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation,” Ergonomics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 429–460, 1996.
20. N. Moray, T. Inagaki, and M. Itoh, “Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks,” J. Exp. Psychol., Appl., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44–58, 2000.
21. A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency,” Amer. Psychol., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 122–147, 1982.
22. M. E. Gist and T. R. Mitchell, “Self-efficacy—A theoretical-analysis of its determinants and malleability,” Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 183–211, 1992.
23. J. R. Busemeyer and J. T. Townsend, “Decision field theory: A dynamic cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 432–459, 1993.
24. J. T. Townsend and J. R. Busemeyer, “Dynamic representation of decision-making,” in Mind as Motion, R. F. Port and T. V. Gelder, Eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995, pp. 101–120.
25. R. Roe, J. R. Busemeyer, and J. T. Townsend, “Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision-making,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 370–392, 2001.
26. J. R. Busemeyer and A. Diederich, “Survey of decision field theory,” Math. Soc. Sci., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 345–370, 2002.
27. B. Brehmer, “Strategies in real-time, dynamic decision making,” in Insights in Decision Making, R. M. Hogarth, Ed. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press, 1990, pp. 262–279.
28. W. Edwards, “Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 109–135, 1962.
29. A. Bandura and D. Cervone, “Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1017–1028, 1983.
30. J. R. Busemeyer and I. J. Myung, “An adaptive approach to human decision making: Learning theory, decision theory, and human performance,” J. Exp. Psychol., Gen., vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 177–194, 1992.
31. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
32. K. A. See, The Effect of Sound on Performance, Reliance, Decision Making, and Trust in Semi-Automatic Process Control Systems. Iowa City, IA: Dept. Mech. Ind. Eng., Univ. Iowa Press, 2002.
33. D. V. C. Reising and P. M. Sanderson, “Ecological interface design for pasteurizer II: A process description of semantic mapping,” Hum. Factors, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 222–247, 2002.
34. V. A. Riley, “Human use of automation,” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Psychol. Univ., Minneapolis, MN, 1994.
35. R. Parasuraman, R. Molloy, and I. Singh, “Performance consequences of automation-induced, complacency,” Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1993.
36. C. Gonzalez and J. Quesada, “Learning in dynamic decision making: The recognition process,” Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 287–304, 2003.
37. C. Gonzalez, J. F. Lerch, and C. Lebiere, “Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 591–635, 2003.
38. S. Roberts and H. Pashler, “How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 358–367, 2000.
39. J. Gao and J. D. Lee, “Information sharing, trust, and reliance—A dynamic model of multi-operator multi-automation interaction,” in Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation: Current Research and Trends, vol. 2, D. A. Vincenzi, M. Mouloua, and P. A. Hancock, Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004, pp. 34–39.
40. E. Hutchins, “How a cockpit remembers its speeds,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 265–288, 1995.