How are conditions for participation expressed in education policy documents? a review of documents in Scotland and Sweden

European Journal of Special Needs Education

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 251-272

  Maxwell, Gregor ^a,c   Granlund, Mats ^b,c  

^a JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Swed Inst for Wood Technol Res   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Disability and health: child and youth (icf cy); Document analysis; Education policy; Environmental conditions; International classification of functioning; Participation

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPECIAL EDUCATION; SWEDEN; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 79956270163     PISSN: 08856257     EISSN: 1469591X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2011.563610     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Abberley, P. 1987. The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability & Society 2, no. 1: 5-19.
2. Adolfsson, M., J. Malmqvist, M. Pless, and M. Granlund. 2010. Identifying child functioning from an ICF-CY perspective. Everyday life situations in measures of participation. Disability and Rehabilitation. Early online; 1-15.
3. Ainley, S., G. Becker, and L. Coleman eds. 1986. The dilemma of difference: A multidisciplinary view of stigma. London: Plenum Press.
4. Arbetsmiljölag. 1977. Sweden: Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet ARM.
5. Arnott, M., and I. Menter. 2007. The same but different? Post-devolution regulation and control in education in scotland and england. European Educational Research Journal 6, no. 3: 250-65.
6. Badley, E.M. 2008. Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Social Science & Medicine 66, no. 11: 2335-45.
7. Barnes, C. 1996. Disability and the myth of the independent researcher. Disability & Society 11, no. 1: 107-12.
8. Bickenbach, J.E., S. Chatterji, E.M. Badley, and T.B. Üstün. 1999. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science & Medicine 48, no. 9: 1173-87.
9. Björck-Åkesson, E., M. Granlund, and R.J. Simeonsson. 2005. A systems theory perspective. In Mångsidigt samspel: En vänbok till siv fischbein, eds. E. Heimdahl Mattson, A.L. Lange, L. Roll-Pettersson, and M. Westling Allodi, 41-55. Stockholm: HLS Fötlag.
10. Bury, M. 1996. Disability and the myth and the independant researcher: A reply. Disability & Society 11, no. 1: 112-5.
11. Cieza, A., S. Geyh, S. Chatterji, N. Kostanjsek, B. Üstün, and G. Stucki. 2005. Icf linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 37: 212-8.
12. Curriculum for the compulsory school system, the pre-school class and the leisure-time centre Lpo 94. 1994. Stockholm: Skolverket.
13. Disability Discrimination Act. 1995. United Kingdom.
14. Disability Discrimination Act. 2005. United Kingdom.
15. Diskrimineringslag. 2008. Sweden: Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet DISK.
16. Education Act. 1985. Sweden: Ministry of Education and Science in Sweden.
17. Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act. 2004. Scotland: Scottish Executive.
18. Education (Disability Strategies and Pupils' Educational Records) (Scotland) Act. 2002. Scotland.
19. Education (Scotland) Act. 1980. United Kingdom.
20. Eriksson, L., J. Welander, and M. Granlund. 2007. Participation in everyday school activities for children with and without disabilities. Journal of Developmental Physical Disability 19: 485-502.
21. Göransson, K., and C. Nilholm. 2009. Inclusive education in sweden?: Ideas, policies and pracitices. La Nouvelle Revue de l'Adaptation et de la Scolarisation 5: 83-98.
22. Granlund, M. 2006. Studies of participation related to ICF-CY. Paper presentat at the Invited presentation MHADIE meeting, June 6, in Prague, Czech Republic.
23. Granlund, M. 2009. Environmental dimension of participation related to ICF-CY. Paper presentat at the Invited presentation MURINET meeting, November 20, in Zürich, Switzerland. Grundskoleförordning. Stockholm. 1994. 1194.
24. Haug, P. 1999. Formulation and realization of social justice: The compulsory school for all in Sweden and Norway. European Journal of Special Needs Education 14, no. 3: 231-9.
25. Highland Council Education, Culture and Sport Service. Accessibility Strategy 2006-2009. 2007. Inverness: The Highland Council.
26. Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27. Läroplan för det obligatoriska skolväsendet. Förskoleklassen och Fritidshemmet. 1994.
28. Lee, A., and R.J. Simeonsson. 2008. Education Law, Rights, and the ICF-CY for Children with Disabilities: A review of international policy documents. Jönköping University, Sweden & Univeristy of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
29. Lundahl, L. 2002a. From centralisation to decentralisation: Governance of education in Sweden. European Educational Research Journal 1, no. 4: 625-36.
30. Lundahl, L. 2002b. Sweden: Decentralization, deregulation, quasi-markets - And then what? Journal of Education Policy 17, no. 6: 687-97.
31. Nilholm, C. 2006. Special education, inclusion and democracy. European Journal of Special Needs Education 21, no. 4: 431-45.
32. OECD. 2005. Students with disabilities, learning difficulties and disadvantages: Statistics and indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
33. Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Penchansky, R., and J.W. Thomas. 1981. The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care 19, no. 2: 127-40.
35. Plan-och bygglag. 2010. Sweden: Miljödepartementet.
36. Riddell, S. 2009. Social justice, equality and inclusion in Scottish education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 30, no. 3: 283-296.
37. Riddell, S., M. Adler, E. Mordaunt, and N. Farmakopoulou. 2000. Special educational needs and competing policy frameworks in England and Scotland. Journal of Education Policy 15, no. 6: 621-35.
38. Riddell, S., A. Wilson, M. Adler, and E. Mordaunt. 2002. Parents, professionals and special educational needs policy frameworks in England and Scotland. Policy & Politics 30: 411-25.
39. Simeonsson, R.J., D.D. Bailey, D. Scandlin, G.S. Huntington, and M. Roth. 1999. Disability, health, secondary conditions and quality of life: Emerging issues in public health. In Issues in disabiltiy & health: The role of secondary conditions in quality of life, eds R.J. Simeonsson, and L.N. Mcdevitt, 51-72. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
40. Simeonsson, R.J., D. Carlson, G.S. Huntington, J.S. McMillen and J.L. Brent. 2001. Students with disabilities: A national survey of participation in school activities. Disability and Rehabilitation 23, no. 2: 49-63.
41. Socialdepartementet. 2000. Regeringens proposition 1999/2000: 79 In Från patient till medborgare - en nationell handlingsplan för handikappolitiken.
42. Tisdall, E.K.M., and S. Riddell. 2006. Policies on special needs education: Competing strategies and discourses. European Journal of Special Needs Education 21, no. 4: 363-79.
43. UNESCO. 1994. The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
44. UNESCO. 2000. The Dakar framework for action. Education for all: Meeting our collective commitments. Dakar, Senegal: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
45. WHO. 1980. International classification of impairment, disabilities, and handicap. Geneva: World Health Organization.
46. WHO. 2001. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.
47. WHO. 2007. International classification of functioning, disability and health - version for children & youth (ICF-CY). Geneva: World Health Organization.