Special educational needs and competing policy frameworks in england and scotland

Journal of Education Policy

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 621-635

  Riddell, Sheila ^a   Adler, Michael ^b   Mordaunt, Enid ^b   Farmakopoulou, Nadia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034553769     PISSN: 02680939     EISSN: 14645106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02680930010000227     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ACCOUNTS COMMISSION FOR SCOTLAND (2000) Comparing the performance of Scottish Councils: Education 1998/99 Edinburgh: Accounts Commission for Scotland
2. ADLER, M. (1997) Looking backwards to the future: Parental choice and education policy. British Educational Research Journal, 23 (3), 297-315
3. ADLER, M. (forthcoming) Substantivejusticeand procedural fairness in social security, in A. Kjonstad (ed.) Law and Poverty (Oxford: Hart Publishing)
4. ADLER, M. and LONGHURST, B. (1994) Discourse, Powerand Justice: Towards a New Sociology of Imprisonment (London: Routledge)
5. ADLER, M., PETCH, A. and TWEEDIE, J. (1990) Parental Choice and Education Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press)
6. ADLER, M. and SAINSBURY, R. (1991) Administrative justice, quality of service and the operational strategy, in M. Adler and R. Williams (eds.) Social Implications of the Operational Strategy (New Waverley Papers -Social Policy Series No.4), (Edinburgh: Department of Social Policy, University of Edinburgh)
7. BALL, S. J. (1993) Education markets, choice and social class: the market as a class strategy in the UK and theUSA. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14 (1), 3-20
8. BOWERS, T. and WILKINSON, D. (1998) The SEN Code of Practice: is it user-friendly? British Journal of Special Education, 25 (3), 119-125
9. CLARK, C., Dyson, A. and MILLWARD, A. (1995) Towards inclusive schools: Mapping the field, in C. Clark, A. Dyson, and A. Millward (eds) Towards Inclusive Schools? (London: David Fulton Publishers)
10. CLARKE, J. and NEWMAN, J. (1997) TheManagerialState (London: Sage)
11. DEAKIN, N. (1994) The Politics of Welfare: ContinuitiesandChange (London:Harvester Wheatsheaf)
12. Department FOREDUCATION AND Science (1978) Special Educational Needs (The Warnock Report) (London: HMSO)
13. DEPARTMENT FOREDUCATION (1994a) Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs (London: DfE)
14. DEPARTMENTFOREDUCATION (1994b) SpecialEducationalNeeds:A Guidefor Parents (London: HMSO)
15. Department FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT (1997) ExcellenceforAll Children: Meeting Special Educational Needs (London: HMSO)
16. DEPARTMENTFOREDUCATIONANDEMPLOYMENT (1998) SpecialEducationNeeds TribunalAnnualReport 1997-1998 (London: HMSO)
17. DYER, C. (1995) The Code of Practice through LEA eyes. British Journal of Special Education, 22 (2), 48-52.1
18. EVANS, J. (1998) Getting it Right: LEAs and the Special Educational Needs Tribunal (Slough:NFER)
19. EVANS, J (1999) Theimpact of the Special Educational Needs Tribunal on local educational authorities’ policy and planning for special educational needs. SupportforLearning: BritishJournal ofLearning Support, 14 (2), 74-80
20. FOUCAULT, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish (London: Penguin)
21. GARNER, P. (1996) ‘Go forth and co-ordinate!’ What special educational needs co-ordinators think about the Code of Practice. School Organisation, 16 (2), 179-186
22. GOACHER, B., EVANS, J., WELTCN, J. and WEDEL L, K. (1988) Policy and Provision for Special Educational Needs: Implementing the 1980 Education Act (London: Cassell)
23. HARRIS, N. (1997) SpecialEducationalNeedsandAccesstoJustice (Bristol:Jordans)
24. HEWARD, C. and LLOYD SMITH, M. (1990) Assessing the impact of legislation on special education policy-an historical analysis. Journal ofEducation Policy, 5 (1), 21-36
25. HOUSE OF COMMONS (1996) Education Committee Second Report Special Educational Needs: The Working of the Code of Practice andthe Tribunal (London: HMSO)
26. KIRP, D. (1982) Professionalisation as policy choice: British special education in comparative perspective. World Politics, 34 (2), 137-174
27. LANGE, C. and RIDDELL, S. (1999) Special educational needs policy and choice: tensions between developments in the US and UK contexts, in M. McLoughlin and M. Rouse (eds) Special Education and Educational Reform in the US and the UK (London: Routledge)
28. LEWIS, A., NEILL, S. and CAMPBELL, J. (1997) SENCOs and the Code: A National Survey. Support for Learning British Journal of Learning Support, 12 (1) 3-9
29. LIPSKY, M (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy (New York: Russell Sage Foundation)
30. MALE, D. B. and MAY, D. (1997) S tress, burnout and workload in teachers of children with special educational needs. BritishJournalof Special Education, 24 (3), 133-140
31. MASHAW, J. L. (1983) Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims (New Haven and London: Yale University Press)
32. MILLWARD, A. and SKIDMORE, D. (1998) LEA responses to the management ofspecial education in the light ofthe Code ofPractice. Educational ManagementandAdministration, 26 (1), 57-66
33. POWER, M (1997) The Audit Society (Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press)
34. RIDDELL, S., (2000) Inclusion and choice: mutually exclusive principles in special educational needs?, in F. Armstrong, D. Armstrong and L. Barton (eds) Inclusive Education: Policy, Contexts and Comparative Perspectives (London: David Fulton Publishers)
35. RIDDELL, S., DYER, S. and THOMSON, G. 1990). Parents, professionals and social welfaremodels: The implementation of theEducation (Scotland) Act1981. EuropeanJournal of Special Needs Education, 5 (2), 96-109
36. RIDDELL, S. and BROWN, S. (EDS) (1994). Special Educational Needs Policy in the 1990s: Warnock in the Market Place (London: Routledge)
37. RIDDELL, S., BROWN, S. and DUFFIELD, J. (1994) Conflicts ofpolicies and models: the case of specificlearning difficulties in S. Riddell and S. Brown (eds) Special Educational Needs Policy in the 1990s: Warnock in the Market Place (London: Routledge)
38. THES COTTISH OFFICE (1993) A Parents’ Guide to Special Educational Needs (Edinburgh: The Scottish Office)
39. SCOTTISH OFFICE EDUCATION AND INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT (1996) Children and Young Persons with Special Educational Needs: AssessmentandRecording (Circular 4/96) (Edinburgh: HMSO)
40. SCOTTISH OFFICE EDUCATIONAL INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT (1998) A Manual of Good Practice in Special Educational Needs (Edinburgh: HMSO)
41. SPECIAL EDUCATICNAL NEEDS TRIBUNAL (1997) Special Educational Needs Tribunal: Annual Report 1996/97 (London: HMSO)
42. TITMUSS, R. (1968) Commitmentto Welfare (London: AllenandUnwin)
43. TOMLINSON, S. (1982) A Sociology of Special Education (London: Routledgeand Kegan Paul)
44. VINCENT, C., EVANS, J., LUNT, I. and YOUNG, P. (1996) Professionals under pressure: theadministration ofspecial education in a changing context. British Educational Research Journal, 22 (4), 475-490
45. WEARMOUTH, J. (1996) Registering special educational needs: for what purpose? Support for Learning, 11 (3), 118-122
46. WEATHERLEY, R. and LIPSKY, M. (1977) Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special educational reform. HarvardEducational Review, 47 (2), 171-197
47. WOLFENDALE, S. and COOK, G. (1997) Evaluation of Special Educational Needs Parent Partnership Schemes (London: DfEE)