Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 181-190

  Shalvi, Shaul ^a   Dana, Jason ^b   Handgraaf, Michel J J ^a   De Dreu, Carsten K W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral economics; Behavioral ethics; Counterfactual thinking; Deception; Ethical decision making; Ethics; Lies; Morality; Mutability; Norm Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956265334     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alingham M.G., Sandmo A. Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics 1972, 1:323-338.
2. Batson C.D., Kobrynowicz D., Dinnerstein J.L., Kampf H.C., Wilson A.D. In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 72:1335-1348.
3. Batson C.D., Thompson E.R. Why don't moral people act morally? Motivational considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2001, 10:54-57.
4. Batson C.D., Thompson E.R., Seuferling G., Whitney H., Strongman J. Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:525-537.
5. Bazerman M.H., Banaji M.R. The social psychology of ordinary unethical behavior. Social Justice Research 2004, 17:111-115.
6. Becker G.S. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 1968, 76:169.
7. Chugh D., Bazerman M.H., Banaji M.R. Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflict of interest. Conflict of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and policy 2005, 74-95. Cambridge University Press, NY, NY. D.A. Moore, D.M. Cain, G. Lowenstein, M.H. Bazerman (Eds.).
8. Dunning D. Self insight: Roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself 2005, Psychological Press, New York.
9. Dunning D., Heath C., Suls J.M. Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2004, 5:69-106.
10. Ehrlinger J., Dunning D. How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) assessments of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 84:5-17.
11. Epstude K., Roese N.J. The functional theory of coutnerfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2008, 12:168-192.
12. Fischbacher, U., & Heusi, F. (2008). Lies in disguise, an experimental study on cheating. TWI working paper 40, Thurgau Institute of Economics, University of Konstanz.
13. Garner W.R. Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts 1962, Wiley, NY.
14. Garner W.R. Good patterns have few alternatives. American Scientist 1970, 58:34-42.
15. Gino F., Ayal S., Ariely D. Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science 2009, 20:393-398.
16. Gino F., Bazerman M.H. When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others' unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45:708-719.
17. Gino F., Norton M., Ariely D. The counterfeit self: The deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological Science 2010, 21:712-720.
18. Gneezy U. Deception: The role of consequences. American Economic Review 2005, 95:384-394.
19. Greene J.D., Paxton J.M. Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2009, 106:12506-12511.
20. Güth W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1982, 3:367-388.
21. Hsee C.K. Elastic justification: How tempting but task irrelevant factors influence decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1995, 62:330-337.
22. Hsee C.K. Elastic justification: How unjustifiable factors influence judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996, 66:122-129.
23. Judd C.M., Kenny D.A., McClelland G.H. Estimating and testing meditation and moderation in within-subjects designs. Psychological Methods 2001, 6:115-134.
24. Kagel J.H., Kim C., Moser D. Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs. Games and Economic Behavior 1996, 13:100-110.
25. Kahneman D. Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1992, 51:296-312.
26. Kahneman D., Miller D.T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 1986, 93:136-153.
27. Kahneman D., Varey C.A. Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 59:1101-1110.
28. Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 108:480-498.
29. Lammers J., Stapel D.A., Galinsky A.D. Power increases hypocrisy moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science 2010, 21:737-744.
30. Lundquist T., Ellingsen T., Johannesson M. The aversion to lying. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2009, 70:81-92.
31. Mandel D.R., Dhami M.K. " What I did" versus " what I might have done": Effect of factual and counterfactual thinking on blame, guilt, and shame in prisoners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005, 41:627-635.
32. Markman K.D., Gavanski I., Sherman S.J., McMullen M.N. The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1993, 29:87-109.
33. Markman K.D., McMullen M.N. A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2003, 7:244-267.
34. Markman K.D., McMullen M.N., Elizaga R.A. Counterfactual thinking, persistence, and performance: A test of the reflection and evaluation model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44:421-428.
35. Mazar N., Amir O., Ariely D. The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research 2008, 45:633-644.
36. Miller D.T., Gunasegaram S. Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events implications for blame assignment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 59:1111-1118.
37. Morris M.W., Moore P.C. The lessons we (don't) learn: Counterfactual thinking and organizational accountability after a close call. Administrative Science Quarterly 2000, 45:737-765.
38. Mussweiler T. Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review 2003, 110:472-489.
39. Pillutla M.M., Murnighan J.K. Being fair or appearing fair: Strategic behavior in ultimatum bargaining. The Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38:1408-1426.
40. Pillutla M.M., Murnighan J.K. Fairness in bargaining. Social Justice Research 2003, 16:241-262.
41. Reichert L.K., Slate J.R. Reflective learning: The use of " if only..." statements to improve performance. Social Psychology of Education 2000, 3:261-275.
42. Ritov I. Anchoring in simulated competitive market negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996, 67:16-25.
43. Ritov I., Baron J. Outcome knowledge, regret, and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1995, 64:119-127.
44. Roese N.J. The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 66:805-818.
45. Roese N. Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin 1997, 121:133-148.
46. Roese N.J., Olson J.M. Better, stronger, faster: Self-serving judgment, affect regulation, and the optimal vigilance hypothesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2007, 2:124-141.
47. Schweitzer M.E., Hsee C.K. Stretching the truth: Elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2002, 25:185-201.
48. Shalvi S., Handgraaf M.J.J., De Dreu C.K.W. Ethical maneuvering: Why people avoid both major and minor lies. British Journal of Management 2011, 22:S16-S27.
49. Snyder M.L., Kleck R.E., Strenta A., Mentzer S.J. Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional ambiguity analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37:2297-2306.
50. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185:1124-1131.
51. Zeelenberg M., van Dijk W.W., van der Pligt J., Manstead A.S.R., van Empelen P., Reinderman D. Emotional reactions to the outcomes of decisions: The role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1998, 75:117-141.