Anchoring in simulated competitive market negotiation

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 16-25

  Ritov, Ilana ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030191455     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0062     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bazerman, M. H., Magliozzi, T., & Neale, M. A. (1985). Integrative bargaining in a competitive market. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 294-313.
2. Benton, A. A., Kelley, H. H., & Liebling, B. (1972). Effects of extremity of offers and concession rate on the outcomes of bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 73-83.
3. Chertkoff, J. M., & Conley, M. (1967). Opening offer and frequency of concession as bargaining strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 181-185.
4. Huber, V. L., & Neale, M. A. (1986). Effects of cognitive heuristics and goals on negotiator performance and subsequent goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 342-365.
5. Huber, V. L., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Effects of self and competitor goals on performance in an interdependent bargaining task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 197-203.
6. Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 296-312.
7. Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1993). Manuscript.
8. Kelley, H. H. (1966). A classroom study of the dilemmas in interpersonal negotiations. In K. Archibald (Ed.), Strategic interaction and conflict. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
9. Liebert, R. M., Smith, W. P., Hill, J. H., & Kieffer, M. (1968). The effects of information and magnitude of initial offer on interpersonal negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 431-441.
10. Neale, M. A. (1984). The effect of negotiation and arbitration cost salience on bargainer behavior: The role of arbitrator and constituency in negotiator judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 97-111.
11. Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1985). The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargainer behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 34-49.
12. Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Cognition and rationality in negotiation. New York: The Free Press.
13. Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1992). Negotiator cognition and rationality: A behavioral decision theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 157-175.
14. Neale, M. A., Huber, V. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1987). The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 228-241.
15. Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. (1986). Experts, amateurs, and refrigerators: Comparing expert and amateur negotiators in a novel task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 305-317.
16. Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84-97.
17. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
18. Pruitt, D. G. (1983). Achieving integrative agreements. In M. H. Bazerman, & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.). Negotiating in organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
20. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.