Complications Specific to Motion-Sparing Devices in the Lumbar Spine

Seminars in Spine Surgery

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 123-134

  Chao, Simon ^a   Malloy, John P ^b   Bono, Christopher M ^c  

^a The Johns Hopkins University ^*

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BAYVIEW MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; Lumbar spine; Motion preservation; Motion sparing

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CATASTROPHIC IMPLANT FAILURE; DEVICE BREAKAGE; DEVICE CORE BREAKDOWN; DEVICE CORE DISPLACEMENT; DEVICE MIGRATION; DEVICE SUBSIDENCE; FACET DEGENERATION; FACET REPLACEMENT; FIXATION DEVICE; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; IATROGENIC STENOSIS; IMPLANT DISLOCATION; IMPLANT MALPOSITION; INTERSPINOUS PROCESS SPACER; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISEASE; LEG PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MOTION SPARING DEVICE; OSTEOPENIA; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SCREW BREAKAGE; SPINE FUSION; SPINOUS PROCESS EROSION; SPINOUS PROCESS FRACTION; SUBLUXATION; TOTAL LUMBAR DISK ARTHROPLASTY; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; VERTEBRA FRACTURE;

EID: 79956065851     PISSN: 10407383     EISSN: 15584496     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.semss.2010.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Cunningham B.W., Gordon J.D., Dmitriev A.E., et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003, 28:S110-S117.
2. Guyer R.D., McAfee P.C., Banco R.J., et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 2009, 9:374-386.
3. Zigler J., Delamarter R., Spivak J.M., et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32:1155-1162.
4. Kondrashov D.G., Hannibal M., Hsu K.Y., et al. Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 4-year follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006, 19:323-327.
5. Welch W.C., Cheng B.C., Awad T.E., et al. Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system: 1-Year preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus 2007, 22:E8.
6. McAfee P., Khoo L.T., Pimenta L., et al. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a total posterior arthroplasty prosthesis: implant description, surgical technique, and a prospective report on 29 patients. Neurosurg Focus 2007, 22:E13.
7. Acosta F.L., Aryan H.E., Ames C.P. Emerging directions in motion preservation spinal surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2005, 16:665-669.
8. Spinal Arthroplasty: The Preservation of Motion 2007, W. B. Saunders (Elsevier), Philadelphia. A.R. Vaccaro, R.C. Sasso, R.W. Haid (Eds.).
9. Motion Preservation Surgery of the Spine: advanced Techniques and Controversies 2008, W. B. Saunders (Elsevier), Philadelphia. J.J. Yue, R. Bertagnoli, P.C. McAfee (Eds.).
10. Buttner-Janz K., Schellnack K., Zippel H. An alternative therapeutic strategy using the disk endoprosthesis of the SB Charite modular type in lumbar disk lesions [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1987, 125:1-6.
11. David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32:661-666.
12. Lemaire J.P., Carrier H., Ali E.H.S., et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005, 18:353-359.
13. Punt I.M., Visser V.M., van Rhijn L.W., et al. Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J 2008, 17:36-43.
14. van Ooij A., Oner F.C., Verbout A.J. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003, 16:369-383.
15. Shim C.S., Lee S., Maeng D.H., et al. Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: report of two cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005, 18:465-469.
16. Tropiano P., Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., et al. Lumbar disc replacement: Preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003, 16:362-368.
17. Galbusera F., Bellini C.M., Zweig T., et al. Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 2008, 17:1635-1650.
18. Rosen C., Kiester P.D., Lee T.Q. Lumbar disk replacement failures: review of 29 patients and rationale for revision. Orthopedics 2009, 32:562. http://www.OrthoSuperSite.com/view.asp?rID=41919.
19. Schulte T.L., Lerner T., Hackenberg L., et al. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32:E645-E648.
20. Mathew P., Blackman M., Redla S., et al. Bilateral pedicle fractures following anterior dislocation of the polyethylene inlay of a ProDisc artificial disc replacement: a case report of an unusual complication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005, 30:E311-E314.
21. Griffith S.L., Shelokov A.P., Buttner-Janz K., et al. A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charité intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994, 19:1842-1849.
22. McAfee P.C., Cunningham B., Holsapple G., et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005, 30:1576-1583. discussion: E1388-E1590.
23. Cinotti G., David T., Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996, 21:995-1000.
24. Stieber J.R., Donald G.D. Early failure of lumbar disc replacement: Case report and review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006, 19:55-60.
25. Mayer H.M. Total lumbar disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:1029-1037.
26. Siepe C.J., Mayer H.M., Wiechert K., et al. Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications. Spine (Phila Pa) 1976 2006, 31:1923-1932.
27. Zigler J.E., Burd T.A., Vialle E.N., et al. Lumbar spine arthroplasty. Early results using Prodisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003, 16:352-361.
28. Fraser R.D., Ross E.R., Lowery G.L., et al. AcroFlex design and results. Spine J 2004, 4:245S-251S.
29. Dooris A.P., Goel V.K., Grosland N.M., et al. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001, 26:E122-E129.
30. McAfee P.C., Cunningham B.W., Devine J., et al. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003, 16:384-389.
31. Kuchta J., Sobottke R., Eysel P., et al. Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2009, 18:823-829.
32. Zucherman J.F., Hsu K.Y., Hartjen C.A., et al. A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-Year results. Eur Spine J 2004, 13:22-31.
33. Zucherman J.F., Hsu K.Y., Hartjen C.A., et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: Two-year follow-up results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005, 30:1351-1358.
34. Anderson P.A., Tribus C.B., Kitchel S.H. Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2006, 4:463-471.
35. Barbagallo G.M.V., Corbino L.A., Olindo G., et al. The "sandwich phenomenon": a rare complication in adjacent, double-level X-stop surgery: Report of three cases and review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010, 35:E96-E100.
36. Barbagallo G.M.V., Olindo G., Corbino L., et al. Analysis of complications in patients treated with the X-Stop Interspinous Process Decompression System: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring system for patient selection and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2009, 65:111-119. discussion: 119-120.
37. Miller J.D., Miller M.C., Lucas M.G. Erosion of the spinous process: A potential cause of interspinous process spacer failure. J Neurosurg Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010, 12:210-213.
38. Siddiqui M., Smith F.W., Wardlaw D. One-year results of X Stop interspinous implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32:1345-1348.
39. Verhoof O.J., Bron J.L., Wapstra F.H., et al. High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (XStop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 2008, 17:188-192.
40. Dubois G., de Germay B., Schaerer N.S., et al. Dynamic neutralization: a new concept for restabilization of the spine. Lumbar Segmental Instability 1999, 233-240. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. M. Szalski, R. Gunzburg, M.H. Pope (Eds.).
41. Stoll T.M., Dubois G., Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 2002, 11:S170-S178.
42. Ahn S.H., Ahn M.W., Byun W.M. Effect of the transligamentous extension of lumbar disc herniations on their regression and the clinical outcome of sciatica. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000, 25:475-480.
43. Atlas S.J., Keller R.B., Chang Y., et al. Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: five-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001, 26:1179-1187.
44. Putzier M., Schneider S.V., Funk J.F., et al. The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005, 30:E109-E114.
45. Bothmann M., Kast E., Boldt G.J., et al. Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration. Neurosurg Review 2008, 31:189-196.
46. Grob D., Benini A., Junge A., et al. Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine. Surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005, 30:324-331.
47. Nockels R.P. Dynamic stabilization in the surgical management of painful lumbar spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005, 30:S68-S72.
48. Wurgler-Hauri C.C., Kalbarczyk A., Wiesli M., et al. Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008, 33:E66-E72.
49. Majd M., Kube R., Holt R.T. Complications and adverse events observed when using DYNESYS as a dynamic stabilization device. Spine J 2008, 8:6S.
50. Ghiselli G., Wang J.C., Bhatia N.N., et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:1497-1503.
51. Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003, 16:338-345.
52. Lehmann T.R., Spratt K.F., Tozzi J.E., et al. Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987, 12:97-104.
53. Leong J.C.Y., Chun S.Y., Grange W.J., et al. Long-term results of lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983, 8:793-799.
54. Schmoelz W., Huber J.F., Nydegger T., et al. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003, 16:418-423.
55. Graf H. Lumbar instability surgical treatment without fusion: soft system stabilization. Rachis 1992, 412:123-137.
56. Kanayama M., Hashimoto T., Shigenobu K. Rationale, biomechanics, and surgical indications for Graf ligamentoplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005, 36:373-377.
57. Hadlow S.V., Fagan A.B., Hillier T.M., et al. The Graf ligamentoplasty procedure: comparison with posterolateral fusion in the management of low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998, 23:1172-1179.
58. Kanayama M., Hashimoto T., Shigenobu K., et al. Non-fusion surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis using artificial ligament stabilization: surgical indication and clinical results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005, 30:588-592.
59. Markwalder T.M., Wenger M. Dynamic stabilization of lumbar motion segments by use of Graf's ligaments: results with an average follow-up of 7.4 years in 39 highly selected, consecutive patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003, 145:209-214. discussion: 214.
60. Mulholland R.C., Sengupta D.K. Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J 2002, 11:S198-S205.
61. Gardner A., Pande K.C. Graf ligamentoplasty: a 7-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2002, 11:S157-S163.
62. Grevitt M.P., Gardner A.D.H., Spilsbury J., et al. The Graf stabilisation system: Early results in 50 patients. Eur Spine J 1995, 4:169-175.
63. Kanayama M., Hashimoto T., Shigenobu K., et al. Adjacent-segment morbidity after Graf ligamentoplasty compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg 2001, 95:5-10.
64. Kanayama M., Hashimoto T., Shigenobu K., et al. A minimum 10-year follow-up of posterior dynamic stabilization using Graf artificial ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32:1992-1996.
65. Madan S., Boeree N.R. Outcome of the Graf ligamentoplasty procedure compared with anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the Hartshill horseshoe cage. Eur Spine J 2003, 12:361-368.
66. Rigby M.C., Selmon G.P.F., Foy M.A., et al. Graf ligament stabilisation: mid-to long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J 2001, 10:234-236.
67. Humke T., Grob D., Grauer W., et al. Foraminal changes with distraction and compression of the L4/5 and L5/S1 segments. Eur Spine J 1996, 5:183-186.
68. Nagano A., Miyamoto K., Nishimoto H., et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for failed Graf ligamentoplasty: a report of two cases. J Orthop Surg 2009, 17:220-222.
69. Phillips F.M., Tzermiadianos M.N., Voronov L.I., et al. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty system after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments. Spine J 2009, 9:96-102.
70. Wilke H.J., Schmidt H., Werner K., et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006, 31:2790-2796. discussion: 2797.
71. Zhu Q., Larson C.R., Sjovold S.G., et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty system: 3-dimensional kinematics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32:55-62.
72. Bertagnoli R., Tropiano P., Zigler J., et al. Hybrid constructs. Orthop Clin North Am 2005, 36:379-388.