Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis: A 4-year follow-up study

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 323-327

  Kondrashov, Dimitriy G ^a,b   Hannibal, Matthew ^a   Hsu, Ken Y ^a   Zucherman, James F ^a  

^a ST MARY S MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Interspinous process decompression; IPD; Motion preservation; Neurogenic claudication; Spinal stenosis; X STOP

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DEVICE; FOLLOW UP; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTERSPINOUS PROCESS DECOMPRESSION; LEG PAIN; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SCREENING; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE SURGERY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

AGED; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; SPINAL STENOSIS;

EID: 33747839684     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211294.67508.3b     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, et al. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine. 1992;17:1-8.
2. Senegas J. Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(Suppl 2):S164-S169. Epub 2002 Jun.
3. Mariottini A, et al. Preliminary results of a soft novel lumbar intervertebral prosthesis (DIAM) in the degenerative spinal pathology. Acta Neurochir. 2005;92(Suppl):129-131.
4. Gillespie KA, Dickey JP. Biomechanical role of lumbar spine ligaments in flexion and extension: determination using a parallel linkage robot and a porcine model. Spine. 2004;29:1208-1216. Jun 1.
5. Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, et al. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine. 2005;30:744-749.
6. Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY, et al. The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine. 2003;28:26-32.
7. Wiseman CM, Lindsey DP, Fredrick AD, et al. The effect of an interspinous process implant on facet loading during extension. Spine. 2005;30:903-907.
8. Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, et al. A multi-center, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X-STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine. 2005;30:1351-1358.
9. Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, et al. A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X-STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:22-31.
10. Stucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, et al. Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:796-803.
11. Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, et al. Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:1369-1378.
12. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG, et al. The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:809-816.
13. Johnson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, et al. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Clinical features related to radiographic findings. Spine. 1997;22:2932-2937.
14. Pratt RK, Fairbank JC, Virr A. The reliability of the shuttle walking test, the Swiss Oxford spinal stenosis score, and the Oswestry disability index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2002;27:84-91.
15. Lee J, Hida K, Seki T, et al. An interspinous process distractor (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive cases. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17:72-77.