Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: Report of two cases

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 465-469

  Shim, Chan Shik ^a   Lee, Seungcheol ^a   Maeng, Dae Hyun ^a   Lee, Sang Ho ^a  

^a Gimpo Airport Wooridul Spine Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Complication; Disc arthroplasty; ProDisc; Total disc replacement; Vertebral fracture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; BONE PLATE; CASE REPORT; DEVICE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRA BODY; VERTEBRA FRACTURE; INJURY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; PROSTHESIS; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FRACTURE;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FRACTURES;

EID: 33644828313     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000159035.35365.df     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bertagnoli RKS. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(suppl):S131-S136.
2. Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, et al. Prospective study evaluating total disc replacement: preliminary results. J Spinal Disord. 2003;16:450-454.
3. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine. 1996;21:995-1000.
4. David T. The surgical and medical perioperative complications of lumbar "Charite" disc prosthesis: a review of 132 procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:328.
5. David TJ. Lumbar disc prosthesis: five year follow-up study on 66 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:252.
6. Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Buttner-Janz K, et al. A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the Link SB Charité intervertebral prosthesis: the initial European experience. Spine. 1994;19:1842-1849.
7. Guyer R, Ohnmeiss DD. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Spine. 2003;28(suppl):S15-S23.
8. Hochschuler SH, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, et al. Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(suppl):S106-S110.
9. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop. 1997;337:64-76.
10. Marnay T. Lumbar disc replacement: 7 to 11-year results with ProDisc. Spine J. 2002;2:94S.
11. Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A, et al. Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(suppl):S124-S130.
12. Sott AH, Harrison DJ. Increasing age does not affect good outcome after lumbar disc replacement. Int Orthop. 2000;24:50-53.
13. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord. 2003;16:362-368.
14. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LMLJ, Laaper M, et al. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J. 1999;8:210-217.
15. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LEA, et al. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early clinical results from the United States clinical trial. Spine. 2003;28:S167-S175.
16. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, et al. SB Charité disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a United States center. J Spinal Disord. 2003;16:424-433.
17. Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, et al. Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord. 2003;16:352-361.
18. Chen WJ, Lai PL, Niu CC, et al. Surgical treatment of adjacent instability after lumbar spine fusion. Spine. 2001;26:519-524.
19. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine. 1988;13:375-377.
20. Park P, Garton HJ, Hugh J, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29:1938-1944.
21. Phillips FM, Carlson GD, Bohlman HH, et al. Results of surgery for spinal stenosis adjacent to previous lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13:432-437.
22. Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusion. Spine. 1996;21:970-981.
23. de Kleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WC. Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:108-116.
24. van Ooji A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc. J Spinal Disord. 2003;16:369-383.