Elastic modulus determination of normal and glaucomatous human trabecular meshwork

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 2147-2152

  Last, Julie A ^a   Pan, Tingrui ^b   Ding, Yuzhe ^b   Reilly, Christopher M ^c   Keller, Kate ^d   Acott, Ted S ^d   Fautsch, Michael P ^e   Murphy, Christopher J ^f,g   Russell, Paul ^g  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b University of California   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AQUEOUS HUMOR FLOW; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; SIMULATION; TRABECULAR MESHWORK; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; TRABECULAR MESHWORK;

EID: 79955982200     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6342     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Johnstone M, Grant W. Pressure-dependent changes in structure of the aqueous outflow system of human and monkey eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;75:365-383.
2. Acott TS, Kelley MJ. Extracellular matrix in the trabecular meshwork. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86:543-561.
3. Fuchshofer R, Welge-Lussen U, Lutjen-Drecoll E. The effect of TGF-beta2 on human trabecular meshwork extracellular proteolytic system. Exp Eye Res. 2003;77:757-765.
4. Tovar-Vidales T, Roque R, Clark AF, Wordinger RJ. Tissue transglutaminase expression and activity in normal and glaucomatous human trabecular meshwork cells and tissues. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:622-628.
5. Knepper PA, Goossens W, Hvizd M, Palmberg PF. Glycosaminoglycans of the human trabecular meshwork in primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1360-1367.
6. Russell P, Gasiorowski JZ, Nealy PF, Murphy CJ. Response of human trabecular meshwork cells to topographic cues on the nanoscale level. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:629-635.
7. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 2005;310:1139-1143.
8. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M, Discher D. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J. 2004;86:617-628.
9. Georges PC, Janmey PA. Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials. J Appl Physiol. 2005;98:1547-1553.
10. Solon J, Levental I, Sengupta K, Georges PC, Janmey PA. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys J. 2007;93:4453-4461.
11. Takai E, Costa KD, Shaheen A, Hung CT, Guo XE. Osteoblast elastic modulus measured by atomic force microscopy is substrate dependent. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33:963-971.
12. Bergethon PR, Trinkaus-Randall V, Franzblau C. Modified hydroxyethylmethacrylate hydrogels as a modelling tool for the study of cell-substratum interactions. J Cell Sci. 1989;92:111-121.
13. Engler AJ, Griffin MA, Sen S, Bonnemann CG, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J Cell Biol. 2004;166:877-887.
14. Gunn JW, Turner SD, Mann BK. Adhesive and mechanical properties of hydrogels influence neurite extension. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;72:91-97.
15. Koh WG, Revzin A, Simonian A, Reeves T, Pishko M. Control of mammalian cell and bacteria adhesion on substrates micropatterned with poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Biomed Microdevices. 2003;5:11-19.
16. Semler EJ, Lancin PA, Dasgupta A, Moghe PV. Engineering hepatocellular morphogenesis and function via ligand-presenting hydrogels with graded mechanical compliance. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;89:296-307.
17. Shin H, Zygourakis K, Farach-Carson MC, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG. Modulation of differentiation and mineralization of marrow stromal cells cultured on biomimetic hydrogels modified with Arg-Gly-Asp containing peptides. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;69:535-543.
18. Wallace C, Jacob JT, Stoltz A, Bi J, Bundy K. Corneal epithelial adhesion strength to tethered-protein/peptide modified hydrogel surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;72:19-24.
19. Wozniak MA, Desai R, Solski PA, Der CJ, Keely PJ. ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:583-595.
20. Xia W, Liu W, Cui L, et al. Tissue engineering of cartilage with the use of chitosan-gelatin complex scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;71:373-380.
21. Campbell GR, Chamley-Campbell JH. Smooth-muscle phenotypic modulation: role in atherogenesis. Med Hypotheses. 1981;7:729-735.
22. Glukhova MA, Koteliansky VE. Integrins, cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix proteins in developing smooth muscle cells of human aorta. In: Schwartz SM, Mecham RP, ed. The Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Molecular and Biological Responses to the Extracellular Matrix. New York: Academic Press; 1995:37-79.
23. Stedman HH, Sweeney HL, Shrager JB, et al. The Mdx mouse diaphragm reproduces the degenerative changes of Duchenne muscular-dystrophy. Nature. 1991;352:536-539.
24. Stenmark KR, Mecham RP. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pulmonary vascular remodeling. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997;59:89-144.
25. Genes NG, Rowley JA, Mooney DJ, Bonassar LJ. Effect of substrate mechanics on chondrocyte adhesion to modified alginate surfaces. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004;422:161-167.
26. Georges PC, Hui JJ, Gombos Z, et al. Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: implications for fibrosis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G1147-G1154.
27. Wells RG. The role of matrix stiffness in hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39:S158-S161.
28. Zaman MH, Trapani LM, Siemeski A, et al. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cellmatrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103:10889-10894.
29. Last JA, Russell P, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. The applications of atomic force microscopy to vision science. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6083-6094.
30. Bowen WR, Lovitt RW, Wright CJ. Application of atomic force microscopy to the study of micromechanical properties of biological materials. Biotechnol Lett. 2000;22:893-903.
31. Canetta E, Adya AK. Atomic force microscopy: applications to nanobiotechnology. J Indian Chem Soc. 2005;82:1147-1172.
32. Docheva D, Padula D, Popov C, Mutschler W, Clausen-Schaumann H, Schieker M. Researching into the cellular shape, volume and elasticity of mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts and osteosarcoma cells by atomic force microscopy. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:537-552.
33. Hsieh CH, Lin YH, Lin S, Tsai-Wu JJ, Herbert Wu CH, Jiang CC. Surface ultrastructure and mechanical property of human chondrocyte revealed by atomic force microscopy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:480-488.
34. Ikai A. Nanobiomechanics of proteins and biomembrane. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:2163-2171.
35. Jandt KD. Atomic force microscopy of biomaterials surfaces and interfaces. Surf Sci. 2001;491:303-332.
36. Li QS, Lee GY, Ong CN, Lim CT. AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;374:609-613.
37. Mathur AB, Collinsworth AM, Reichert WM, Kraus WE, Truskey GA. Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. J Biomech. 2001;34:1545-1553.
38. Rabinovich Y, Esayanur M, Daosukho S, Byer K, El-Shall H, Khan S. Atomic force microscopy measurement of the elastic properties of the kidney epithelial cells. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2005;285:125-135.
39. Rico F, Roca-Cusachs P, Gavara N, Farre R, Rotger M, Navajas D. Probing mechanical properties of living cells by atomic force microscopy with blunted pyramidal cantilever tips. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005;72:021914.
40. Sirghi L, Ponti J, Broggi F, Rossi F. Probing elasticity and adhesion of live cells by atomic force microscopy indentation. Eur Biophys J. 2008;37:935-945.
41. Wagh AA, Roan E, Chapman KE, et al. Localized elasticity measured in epithelial cells migrating at a wound edge using atomic force microscopy. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;295: L54-L60.
42. Sader JE. Parallel Beam Approximation for V-shaped atomic-force microscope cantilevers. Rev Sci Instrum. 1995;66:4583-4587.
43. Ethier CR, Coloma FM, Sit AJ, Johnson M. Two pore types in the inner-wall endothelium of Schlemm's canal. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2041-2048.
44. Timoshenko S, Woinowsky-Krieger S. Theory of Plates and Shells. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1987.
45. Cappella B, Dietler G. Force-distance curves by atomic force microscopy. Surf Sci Rep. 1999;34:1-104.
46. Clifford CA, Seah MP. Quantification issues in the identification of nanoscale regions of homopolymers using modulus measurement via AFM nanoindentation. Appl Surf Sci. 2005;252:1915-1933.
47. Ethier CR. The inner wall of Schlemm's canal. Exp Eye Res. 2002; 74:161-172.
48. Buller C, Johnson D. Segmental variability of the trabecular meshwork in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:3841-3851.
49. Hann C, Bahler C, Johnson D. Cationic ferritin and segmental flow through the trabecular meshwork. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1-7.
50. McKee CT, Wood JA, Shah NM, et al. The effect of biophysical attributes of the ocular trabecular meshwork associated with glaucoma on the cellular response to therapeutic agents. Biomaterials. 2011;32:2417-2423.