Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of two porcine tissues using high-throughput technologies

BMC Genomics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Hornshøj, Henrik ^a   Bendixen, Emøke ^a   Conley, Lene N ^a   Andersen, Pernille K ^a   Hedegaard, Jakob ^a   Panitz, Frank ^a   Bendixen, Christian ^a  

^a DANISH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; PROTEOME;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; HEART MUSCLE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PROTEOMICS; SWINE;

MAMMALIA; SUS;

ANIMALS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 60549106873     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-30     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Schena M Shalon D Davis RW Brown PO Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray Science 1995, 270:467-470 10.1126/science.270.5235.467 7569999
2. Velculescu VE Zhang L Vogelstein B Kinzler KW Serial analysis of gene expression Science 1995, 270:484-487 10.1126/science.270.5235.484 7570003
3. Brenner S Johnson M Bridgham J Golda G Lloyd DH Johnson D et al. Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:630-634 10.1038/76469 10835600
4. Margulies M Egholm M Altman WE Attiya S Bader JS Bemben LA et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors Nature 2005, 437:376-380 1464427 16056220
5. Hedegaard J Skovgaard K Mortensen S Sorensen P Jensen TK Hornshoj H et al. Molecular characterisation of the early response in pigs to experimental infection with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae using cDNA microarrays Acta Vet Scand 2007, 49:11 1868913 17466061 10.1186/ 1751-0147-49-11
6. Hornshoj H Conley LN Hedegaard J Sorensen P Panitz F Bendixen C Microarray Expression Profiles of 20.000 Genes across 23 Healthy Porcine Tissues PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e1203 2065904 18030337 10.1371/ journal.pone.0001203
7. Wiese S Reidegeld KA Meyer HE Warscheid B Protein labeling by iTRAQ: A new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research Proteomics 2007, 7:340-350 10.1002/pmic.200600422 17177251
8. Bitton DA Okoniewski MJ Connolly Y Miller CJ Exon level integration of proteomics and microarray data BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:118 2267708 18298841 10.1186/1471-2105-9-118
9. Danielsen M Hornshoj H Siggers RH Jensen BB van Kessel AG Bendixen E Effects of bacterial colonization on the porcine intestinal proteome J Proteome Res 2007, 6:2596-2604 10.1021/pr070038b 17542629
10. Cheung F Haas BJ Goldberg SM May GD Xiao Y Town CD Sequencing Medicago truncatula expressed sequenced tags using 454 Life Sciences technology BMC Genomics 2006, 7:272 1635983 17062153 10.1186/1471-2164-7-272
11. Emrich SJ Barbazuk WB Li L Schnable PS Gene discovery and annotation using LCM-454 transcriptome sequencing Genome Res 2007, 17:69-73 1716268 17095711 10.1101/gr.5145806
12. Evans SJ Datson NA Kabbaj M Thompson RC Vreugdenhil E De Kloet ER et al. Evaluation of Affymetrix Gene Chip sensitivity in rat hippocampal tissue using SAGE analysis. Serial Analysis of Gene Expression Eur J Neurosci 2002, 16:409-413 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02097.x 12193183
13. Griffith OL Pleasance ED Fulton DL Oveisi M Ester M Siddiqui AS et al. Assessment and integration of publicly available SAGE, cDNA microarray, and oligonucleotide microarray expression data for global coexpression analyses Genomics 2005, 86:476-488 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.06.009 16098712
14. Hackam AS Qian J Liu D Gunatilaka T Farkas RH Chowers I et al. Comparative gene expression analysis of murine retina and brain Mol Vis 2004, 10:637-649 15359217
15. Haverty PM Hsiao LL Gullans SR Hansen U Weng Z Limited agreement among three global gene expression methods highlights the requirement for non-global validation Bioinformatics 2004, 20:3431-3441 10.1093/ bioinformatics/bth421 15256402
16. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA Ashfaq R Maitra A Adsay NV Shen-Ong GL Berg K et al. Highly expressed genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: A comprehensive characterization and comparison of the transcription profiles obtained from three major technologies Cancer Res 2003, 63:8614-8622 14695172
17. Ibrahim AF Hedley PE Cardle L Kruger W Marshall DF Muehlbauer GJ et al. A comparative analysis of transcript abundance using SAGE and Affymetrix arrays Funct Integr Genomics 2005, 5:163-174 10.1007/s10142-005-0135-4 15714318
18. Ishii M Hashimoto S Tsutsumi S Wada Y Matsushima K Kodama T et al. Direct comparison of GeneChip and SAGE on the quantitative accuracy in transcript profiling analysis Genomics 2000, 68:136-143 10.1006/ geno.2000.6284 10964511
19. Li S Li YH Wei T Su EW Duffin K Liao B Too much data, but little inter-changeability: A lesson learned from mining public data on tissue specificity of gene expression Biol Direct 2006, 1:33 1634740 17064414 10.1186/1745-6150-1-33
20. Lu J Lal A Merriman B Nelson S Riggins G A comparison of gene expression profiles produced by SAGE, long SAGE, and oligonucleotide chips Genomics 2004, 84:631-636 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.06.014 15475240
21. Romualdi C De Pitta C Tombolan L Bortoluzzi S Sartori F Rosolen A et al. Defining the gene expression signature of rhabdomyosarcoma by meta-analysis BMC Genomics 2006, 7:287 1636648 17090319 10.1186/ 1471-2164-7-287
22. van Ruissen F Ruijter JM Schaaf GJ Asgharnegad L Zwijnenburg DA Kool M et al. Evaluation of the similarity of gene expression data estimated with SAGE and Affymetrix GeneChips BMC Genomics 2005, 6:91 1186021 15955238 10.1186/1471-2164-6-91
23. Husson H Manavalan P Akmaev VR Russo RJ Cook B Richards B et al. New insights into ADPKD molecular pathways using combination of SAGE and microarray technologies Genomics 2004, 84:497-510 10.1016/ j.ygeno.2004.03.009 15498457
24. Nacht M Ferguson AT Zhang W Petroziello JM Cook BP Gao YH et al. Combining serial analysis of gene expression and array technologies to identify genes differentially expressed in breast cancer Cancer Res 1999, 59:5464-5470 10554019
25. Gowda M Venu RC Raghupathy MB Nobuta K Li H Wing R et al. Deep and comparative analysis of the mycelium and appressorium transcriptomes of Magnaporthe grisea using MPSS, RL-SAGE, and oligoarray methods BMC Genomics 2006, 7:310 1764740 17156450 10.1186/1471-2164-7-310
26. Kim HL Comparison of oligonucleotide-microarray and serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) in transcript profiling analysis of megakaryocytes derived from CD34+ cells Exp Mol Med 2003, 35:460-466 14646601
27. Chen J Agrawal V Rattray M West MA St Clair DA Michelmore RW et al. A comparison of microarray and MPSS technology platforms for expression analysis of Arabidopsis BMC Genomics 2007, 8:414 2190774 17997849 10.1186/1471-2164-8-414
28. Liu F Jenssen TK Trimarchi J Punzo C Cepko CL Ohno-Machado L et al. Comparison of hybridization-based and sequencing-based gene expression technologies on biological replicates BMC Genomics 2007, 8:153 1899500 17555589 10.1186/1471-2164-8-153
29. Nissom PM Sanny A Kok YJ Hiang YT Chuah SH Shing TK et al. Transcriptome and proteome profiling to understanding the biology of high productivity CHO cells Mol Biotechnol 2006, 34:125-140 10.1385/MB:34:2:125 17172658
30. Unwin RD Smith DL Blinco D Wilson CL Miller CJ Evans CA et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals posttranslational control as a regulatory factor in primary hematopoietic stem cells Blood 2006, 107:4687-4694 10.1182/blood-2005-12-4995 16507774
31. Seth G Philp RJ Lau A Jiun KY Yap M Hu WS Molecular portrait of high productivity in recombinant NS0 cells Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 97:933-951 10.1002/bit.21234 17149768
32. Futcher B Latter GI Monardo P McLaughlin CS Garrels JI A sampling of the yeast proteome Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19:7357-7368 84729 10523624
33. Griffin TJ Gygi SP Ideker T Rist B Eng J Hood L et al. Complementary profiling of gene expression at the transcriptome and proteome levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Proteomics 2002, 1:323-333 10.1074/ mcp.M200001-MCP200 12096114
34. Gygi SP Rochon Y Franza BR Aebersold R Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19:1720-1730 83965 10022859
35. Washburn MP Koller A Oshiro G Ulaszek RR Plouffe D Deciu C et al. Protein pathway and complex clustering of correlated mRNA and protein expression analyses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:3107-3112 152254 12626741 10.1073/pnas.0634629100
36. Sperisen P Iseli C Pagni M Stevenson BJ Bucher P Jongeneel CV trome, trEST and trGEN: Databases of predicted protein sequences Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:D509-D511 308801 14681469 10.1093/nar/gkh067
37. Liao BY Zhang J Evolutionary conservation of expression profiles between human and mouse orthologous genes Mol Biol Evol 2006, 23:530-540 10.1093/ molbev/msj054 16280543
38. Lee M Xiang CC Trent JM Bittner ML Performance characteristics of 65-mer oligonucleotide microarrays Anal Biochem 2007, 368:70-78 10.1016/ j.ab.2007.05.010 17617369
39. Schaaf GJ Ruijter JM van Ruissen F Zwijnenburg DA Waaijer R Valentijn LJ et al. Full transcriptome analysis of rhabdomyosarcoma, normal, and fetal skeletal muscle: Statistical comparison of multiple SAGE libraries FASEB J 2005, 19:404-406 15629888
40. Gorodkin J Cirera S Hedegaard J Gilchrist MJ Panitz F Jorgensen C et al. Porcine transcriptome analysis based on 97 non-normalized cDNA libraries and assembly of 1,021,891 expressed sequence tags Genome Biol 2007, 8:R45 1895994 17407547 10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-r45
41. Jorgensen FG Hobolth A Hornshoj H Bendixen C Fredholm M Schierup MH Comparative analysis of protein coding sequences from human, mouse and the domesticated pig BMC Biol 2005, 3:2 549206 15679890 10.1186/ 1741-7007-3-2
42. Barrett T Troup DB Wilhite SE Ledoux P Rudnev D Evangelista C et al. NCBI GEO: Mining tens of millions of expression profiles-database and tools update Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35:D760-D765 1669752 17099226 10.1093/nar/gkl887
43. Smyth GK Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3:ARticle 3 16646809
44. Yang YH Dudoit S Luu P Lin DM Peng V Ngai J et al. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: A robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:e15 100354 11842121 10.1093/nar/30.4.e15