Automated analysis of Heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 47, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 5348-5355

  Coops, Annemiek ^a   Henson, David Barry ^a,b   Kwartz, Anna J ^a   Artes, Paul Habib ^a,b  

^a MANCHESTER ROYAL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HEIDELBERG RETINA TOMOGRAPH; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPTIC DISK; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ADULT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 34248149385     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0579     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Jonas JB, Budde WM. Diagnosis and pathogenesis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy: morphological aspects. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;19:1-40.
2. Lichter PR. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1976;74:532-572.
3. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Miller NR, Sommer A. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:350-356.
4. Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:215-221.
5. Zangwill L, Shakiba S, Caprioli J, Weinreb RN. Agreement between clinicians and a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope in estimating cup/disk ratios. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;119:415-421.
6. Azuara-Blanco A, Katz LJ, Spaeth GL, Vernon SA, Spencer F, Lanzl IM. Clinical agreement among glaucoma experts in the detection of glaucomatous changes of the optic disk using simultaneous stereoscopic photographs. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:949-950.
7. Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, Mikelberg FS. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1730-1742.
8. Kwartz AJ, Henson DB, Harper RA, Spencer AF, McLeod D. The effectiveness of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and laser diagnostic glaucoma scanning system (GDx) in detecting and monitoring glaucoma. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9:1-148.
9. Tipping ME. Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res. 2001;1:211-244.
10. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Fontana L, Hitchings RA. Identifying early glaucomatous changes: comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2272-2277.
11. Burk RO, Vmanninjoki K, Bartke T, et al. Development of the standard reference plane for the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:375-384.
12. Agarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R. The normal optic nerve head on Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003;51:25-33.
13. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1145-1150.
14. McCullaghP. Regression models with ordinal data. J Royal Stat Soc Series B. 1980;42:109-142.
15. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2002:204-205.
16. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996;5:299-314.
17. Harrell FE. Design Package. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. Available at http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/s/Design
18. Hartley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839-843.
19. Liebetrau AM. Measures of Association. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1983.
20. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
21. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Wollstein G, et al. Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:664-669.
22. Jonas JB, Budde WM, Panda-Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Sum Ophthalmol. 1999;43:293-320.
23. Jonas JB. Optic disk size correlated with refractive error. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:346-348.
24. Bowd C, Chan K, Zangwill LM, et al. Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3444-3454.
25. Hothorn T, Lausen B. Bagging tree classifiers for laser scanning images: a data- and simulation-based strategy. Artif Intell Med. 2003;27:65-79.
26. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1008-1015.
27. Jonas JB, Fernandez MC, Naumann GO. Glaucomatous optic nerve atrophy in small discs with low cup-to-disc ratios. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:1211-1215.
28. Heijl A, Molder H. Optic disc diameter influences the ability to detect glaucomatous disc damage. Acta Ophthalmol. 1993;71:122-129.
29. Healey PR, Mitchell P. Optic disk size in open-angle glaucoma: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:515-517.
30. Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza AJ, Suh JK, Hart RT. The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: a new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP-related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24:39-73.
31. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ. 2003;326:41-44.
32. Shunmugam M, Azuara-Blanco A. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2317-2323.
33. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Liebmann JM, Girkin CA, Weinreb RN. A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2520-2527.