Detection of glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry with enhanced corneal compensation

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 3146-3153

  Medeiros, Felipe A ^a   Bowd, Christopher ^a   Zangwill, Linda M ^a   Patel, Chirag ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARAMETER; POLARIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROC CURVE; SCORING SYSTEM; VISUAL FIELD; ALGORITHM; BIREFRINGENCE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; LASER; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; BIREFRINGENCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; LASERS; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 34548069756     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-1139     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Weinreb RN, Dreher AW, Coleman A, et al. Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:557-560.
2. Zhou Q, Weinreb RN. Individualized compensation of anterior segment birefringence during scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2221-2228.
3. Weinreb RN, Bowd C, Zangwill LM. Glaucoma detection using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal polarization compensation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:218-224.
4. Greenfield DS, Knighton RW, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC. Normative retardation data corrected for the corneal polarization axis with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2003;34:165-171.
5. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Fourier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry measurements with variable corneal compensation in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2606-2612.
6. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser Polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:827-837.
7. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Comparison of scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:698-704.
8. Reus NJ, Lemij HG. Diagnostic accuracy of the GDx VCC for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1860-1865.
9. Susanna R Jr, Medeiros FA. Enhanced Corneal Compensation (ECC). In: Susanna R Jr, Medeiros FA, eds. The Optic Nerve in Glaucoma. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Cultura Medica; 2006.
10. Bagga H, Greenfield DS, Feuer WJ. Quantitative assessment of atypical birefringence images using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:437-446.
11. Reus NJ, Zhou Q, Lemij HG. Enhanced imaging algorithm for scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3870-3877.
12. Toth M, Hollo G. Enhanced corneal compensation for scanning laser polarimetry on eyes with atypical polarisation pattern. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1139-1142.
13. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445-1455.
14. Weinreb RN, Shakiba S, Zangwill L. Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;119:627-636.
15. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, et al. A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2520-2527.
16. Pepe MS. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results. Biometrics. 1998;54:124-135.
17. Harrell FE. In: Harrell FE, ed. Regression Modelling Strategies with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York: Springer, 2001.
18. Zhou X-H, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Analysis of correlated ROC data. In: Zhou X-H, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK, eds. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002:274-306.
19. Glynn RJ, Rosner B. Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:381-387.
20. Alonzo TA, Pepe MS. Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques. Biostatistics. 2002;3:421-432.
21. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Use of progressive glaucomatous optic disk change as the reference standard for evaluation of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:1010-1018.
22. Medeiros FA, Ng D, Zangwill L, et al. The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:213-222.