The effects of Tier 2 literacy instruction in sixth grade: Toward the development of a response-to-intervention model in middle school

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 73-86

  Graves, Anne W ^a   Brandon, Regina ^a   Duesbery, Luke ^a   McIntosh, Angela ^a   Pyle, Nicole B ^b  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955809940     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073194871103400105     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2007). Examining the technical adequacy of word and passage reading fluency measures in a progress monitoring assessment system (Technical Report #41). Eugene, OR: Behavioral Research and Teaching.
2. Archer, A., Gleason, M., & Vachon, V. (2002). REWARDS (Reading Excellence: Word Attach & Rate Development Strategies). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
3. Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., Vachon, V. L. (2003). Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(10), 89-101. (Pubitemid 36966857)
4. Beck, I., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: The robust vocabulary. New York, NY: Guilford.
5. Bradley, R., Danielson, L. (2004). The Office of Special Education Program's LD initiative: A context for inquiry and consensus. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(4), 186-188. (Pubitemid 39620625)
6. California State Department of Education. (2003). California English Language Development Test (CELDT). Sacramento: Author.
7. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184-192.
8. Denton, C. A., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Bryan, D. (2008). Intervention provided to linguistically diverse middle school students with severe reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23(2), 79-89.
9. Duesbery, L., & Braun-Monegan, J. (2008, February). Robustness of curriculum-based measures of reading to changes in common administration protocols. Paper presented at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
10. Echevarria, J., & Graves, A. (2010). Sheltered content instruction: Teaching students with diverse needs (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262-300.
12. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Moody, S. W. (1999). Grouping practices and reading outcomes for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 65(3), 399-415.
13. Engelmann, S., Meyer, L., Carnine, L., Becker, W., Eisele, J., & Johnson, G. (1999). Corrective reading, fecoding. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
14. Englert, C. S., Zhao, Y., Collings, N., & Romig, N. (2005). Learning to read words: The effects of Internet-based software in the improvement of reading performance. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 357-373.
15. Fitzgerald, J., & Graves, M. F. (2004). Scaffolding reading experiences for English-language learners. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
16. Fletcher, J. M., Coulter, W. A., Reschly, D. J., Vaughn, S. (2004). Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(2), 304-331. (Pubitemid 40687895)
17. Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3-17.
18. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-99. (Pubitemid 43188227)
19. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22(1), 27-48.
20. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 157-171.
21. Gersten, R., Baker, S., Haager, D., & Graves, A. W. (2005). Exploring the role of teacher quality in predicting reading outcomes for first grade English learners: An observational study. Remedial & Special Education, 38, 212-222.
22. Graves, A. W. (2010). The longitudinal study of the impact of effective beginning reading instruction for English learners: Literacy, language, and learning disabilities. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities, 23, 155-174. London, England: Emerald.
23. Graves, A. W., Gersten, R., Haager, D. (2004). Literacy instruction in multiple-language first-grade classrooms: Linking student outcomes to observed instructional practice. Learning Disabilities Research Practice, 19(4), 262-272. (Pubitemid 39315940)
24. Graves, A. W., Plasencia-Peinado, J., Deno, S., & Johnson, J. (2005). Formatively evaluating the reading progress of firstgrade English learners in multiple language classrooms. Remedial & Special Education, 38, 245-255.
25. Greenwood, C. R., Tapia, Y., Abbott, M., & Walton, C. (2003). A building-based case study of evidence-based literacy practices: Implementation, reading behavior, and growth in reading fluency, K-4. Journal of Special Education, 37, 200-215.
26. Hasbrouck, J., Tindal, G. (2005). Oral reading fluency norms: a valuable tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636-644. (Pubitemid 44884661)
27. Inhot, C., Matsoff, J., Gavin, J., & Hendrickson, L. (2001). Read naturally. St. Paul, MN: Read Naturally. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446. (2006).
28. Johnson, D. R., Stodden, R., Emanuel, E., Luecking, R., & Mack, M. (2002). Current challenges facing secondary education and transition services: What research tells us. Exceptional Children, 68(4), 519-531.
29. Kim, Y-S, Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., & Foorman, B. (2010). Does growth in oral reading fluency matter in reading comprehension Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 652-667.
30. Klingner, J. L., & Edwards, P. A. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 108-117.
31. Linacre, J. B. (2006). Winsteps 3.61.1. Rasch-model computer programs [computer software]. Chicago, IL: MESA.
32. Lloyd, J., Cullinan, D., Heins, E., & Epstein, M. (1980). Direct instruction: Effects on oral and written language comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3(1), 70-76.
33. Lloyd, J. W. (2002). There's more to identifying learning disability than discrepancy. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 427-435). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Magiera, K., Zigmond, N. (2005). Co-teaching in middle school classrooms under routine conditions: Does the instructional experience differ for students with disabilities in co-taught and solo-taught classes? Learning Disabilities Research Practice, 20(2), 79-85. (Pubitemid 40560024)
35. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 525-531. (Pubitemid 41730156)
36. McIntosh, A., Graves, A., & Gersten, R. (2007). The effects of response to intervention on literacy development in multiple language settings. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(3), 197-212.
37. Mellard, D. F., Byrd, S. E., Johnson, E., Tollefson, J. M., & Boesche, L. (2004). Foundations and research on identifying model responsiveness-to-intervention sites. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(4), 243-256.
38. Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N., & Martineau, M. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific texts: The roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 8-45.
39. Reschly, D. J. (2005). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 510-515.
40. Roberts, G., Torgesen, J. K., Boardman, A., & Scammacca, N. (2008). Evidence-based strategies for reading instruction for older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23(2), 63-69.
41. Schleppegrell, M., & Go, A. (2007). Analyzing the writing of English learners: A functional approach. Language Arts, 84, 529-536.
42. Shinn, M., Deno, S., & Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth. The Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 164-172.
43. Silberglitt, B., & Hintze, J. M. (2007). How much growth can we expect? A conditional analysis of R-CBM growth rates by level of performance. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 71-84.
44. Spandel, V., Nathan, R., & Robb, L. (2001). Daybook of critical reading and writing. Willmington, MA: Great Source Education Group.
45. Spycher, P. (2009). Learning academic language through science in two linguistically diverse kindergarten classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 359-379.
46. Torgesen, J., Myers, D., Schirm, A., Stuart, E., Vartivarian, S., Mansfield, W., et al. (2006). National assessment of Title I. Interim report. Volume II: Closing the reading gap: First year findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
47. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33-58.
48. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.
49. Vaughn, S., & Klingner, J. (2007). Overview of the three-tier model or reading intervention. In D. Haager, J. Klingner, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (pp. 3-9). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
50. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekannani, K., Bryant, D. P., Dickson, S., & Blozis, S. A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 127-141.
51. Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C. A., et al. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 3-21.
52. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S., Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 157-169. (Pubitemid 43500094)
53. Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., Tindal, G. (2005). Gradelevel invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(3), 4-12. Washington, DC: National Council on Measurement in Education. (Pubitemid 41658353)