How much growth can we expect? A conditional analysis of R-CBM growth rates by level of performance

Exceptional Children

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 71-84

  Silberglitt, Benjamin ^a   Hintze, John M ^b,c  

^a Technology and Information Educational Services   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548215569     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440290707400104     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Case, L. R. Speece, D. L., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). The validity of a response-to-instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors. School Psychology Review, 32, 557-582.
5. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw Hill.
6. Christ, T. J., & Silberglitt, B. (2007). Estimates of the Standard Error of Measurement for Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading Fluency. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 130-146.
7. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
8. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
9. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
10. Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2004). Applied longitudinal analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
11. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 157-171.
12. Fuchs, L. S. (1986). Monitoring progress among mildly handicapped pupils: Review of current practice and research. Remedial and Special Education, 7(5), 5-12.
13. Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 172-186.
14. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488-500.
15. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(3), 204-219.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
17. Hintze, J. M., & Christ, T., J. (2004). An examination of variability as a function of passage variance in CBM progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 33, 204-217.
18. Hintze, J. M., Owen, S. V., Shapiro, E. S., & Daly, E. J. (2000). Generalizability of oral reading fluency measures: Application of G theory to curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology (Quarterly, 15, 52-68.
19. Hintze, J. M., & Pelle Petitte, H. A. (2001), The generalizability of CBM oral reading fluency measures across general and special education. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19(2), 158-170.
20. Hintze, J. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (1997). Curriculumbased measurement and literature-based reading: Is curriculum-based measurement meeting the needs of changing reading curricula? Journal of School Psychology, 35, 351-375.
21. Hintze, J. M., Shapiro, E. S., Conte, K. L., & Basile, I. M. (1997). Oral reading fluency and authentic reading material: Criterion validity of the technical features of CBM survey-level assessment. School Psychology Review, 26, 535-553.
22. Hintze, J. M., & Silberglitt, B. (2005). A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of R-CBM and high-stakes testing. School Psychology Review, 34, 372-386.
23. Howe, K. B., Scierka, B. J., Gibbons, K. A., & Silberglitt, B. (2003). A school-wide organization system for raising reading achievement using general outcome measures and evidence-based instruction: One education district's experience. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28, 59-72.
24. Howe, K. B., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). Sta dard reading assessment passages (RAPs) for use in general outcome measurement: A manual for describing development and technical features. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation.
25. Marston, D. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
26. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Author.
27. Pearson, P. D., Johnson, D. D., Clymer, T., Indirsano, R., Venezky, R. L., Baumann, J. F., et al. (1989). Silver, Burden, and Ginn. Needham, MA: Silver, Burdett, and Ginn.
28. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear modeis: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
30. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
31. Shinn, M. R., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). Administration and scoring of Reading-Curriculum Based Measurement for use in general outcome measurement (Technical Manual). Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation.
32. Silberglitt, B., & Hintze, J. M. (2005). Formative assessment using CBM-R cut scores to track progress toward success on state-mandated achievement tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(A), 304-325.
33. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(4), 360-407.
34. Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford Press.