A collaborative filtering approach for protein-protein docking scoring functions

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Bourquard, Thomas ^a,b,c   Bernauer, Julie ^b   Azé, Jérôme ^a   Poupon, Anne ^d,e,f  

^a UFR 919 Laboratoire d'Informatique Pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l'Ingénieur   (France)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE   (France)

^c LORIA   (France)

^d UMR85 PHYSIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION ET DES COMPORTEMENTS   (France)

^e CNRS   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLASSIFIER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION TREE; GENETIC ALGORITHM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN DOCKING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; VALIDATION PROCESS; ALGORITHM; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; AREA UNDER CURVE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS;

EID: 79955536838     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018541     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Wodak SJ, Janin J, (2002) Structural basis of macromolecular recognition. Adv Protein Chem 61: 9-73.
2. Sanderson CM, (2009) The cartographers toolbox: building bigger and better human protein interaction networks. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 8: 1-11.
3. Berman H, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat T, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research 28: 235-242.
4. Ritchie DW, (2008) Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking. Curr Protein Pept Sci 9: 1-15.
5. Mosca R, Pons C, Fernández-Recio J, Aloy P, (2009) Pushing structural information into the yeast interactome by high-throughput protein docking experiments. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000490.
6. Kastritis PL, Bonvin AM, (2010) Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark. J Proteome Res 9: 2216-25.
7. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R, (2002) Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 47: 409-43.
8. Andrusier N, Mashiach E, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ, (2008) Principles of exible protein-protein docking. Proteins 73: 271-89.
9. Bernauer J, Bahadur RP, Rodier F, Janin J, Poupon A, (2008) DiMoVo: a Voronoi tessellationbased method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 24: 652-8.
10. Bernauer J, Poupon A, Azé J, Janin J, (2005) A docking analysis of the statistical physics of protein-protein recognition. Phys Biol 2: S17-23.
11. Bernauer J, Azé J, Janin J, Poupon A, (2007) A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties. Bioinformatics 23: 555-62.
12. Bourquard T, Bernauer J, Azé J, Poupon A, (2009) Comparing Voronoi and Laguerre tessellations in the protein-protein docking context;. Sixth International Symposium on Voronoi Diagrams (ISVD) pp. 225-232.
13. Boissonnat JD, Devillers O, Pion S, Teillaud M, Yvinec M, (2002) Triangulations in CGAL. Comput Geom Theory Appl 22: 5-19.
14. Pontius J, Richelle J, Wodak S, (1996) Deviations from standard atomic volumes as a quality measure for protein crystal structures. J Mol Biol 264: 121-36.
15. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z, (2003) A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 52: 88-91.
16. Murzin A, Brenner S, Hubbard T, Chothia C, (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247: 536-40.
17. Su X, Khoshgoftaar TM, (2009) A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Advances in Artificial Intelligence.
18. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, et al. (2009) The weka data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations 11: 10-18.
19. Joachims T, (1999) Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical. Cambridge, MA, USA MIT Press pp. 169-184.
20. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck L, Sternberg M, et al. (2003) CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 52: 2-9.
21. Lensink MF, Mendez R, Wodak SJ, (2007) Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition. Proteins 69: 704-18.
22. Tong Y, Chugha P, Hota PK, Alviani RS, Li M, et al. (2007) Binding of Rac1, Rnd1, and RhoD to a novel Rho GTPase interaction motif destabilizes dimerization of the plexin-B1 effector domain. J Biol Chem 282: 37215-24.
23. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ, (2005) Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 60: 150-69.
24. le Cessie S, van Houwelingen JC, (1992) Ridge estimators in logistic regression. Applied Statistics 41: 191-201.
25. Schölkopf B, Burges CJ, (1998) Advances in kernel methods- support vector learning.
26. Quinlan JR, (1993) C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann.
27. Cohen WW, (1995) Fast effective rule induction. In: Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning pp. 115-123.
28. Eibe Frank IHW, (1998) Generating accurate rule sets without global optimization. In: Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning pp. 144-151.