Validation study of the Short Time Exposure (STE) test to assess the eye irritation potential of chemicals

Toxicology in Vitro

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 796-809

  Sakaguchi, Hitoshi ^a   Ota, Naoko ^b   Omori, Takashi ^c   Kuwahara, Hirofumi ^d   Sozu, Takashi ^e   Takagi, Yumi ^f   Takahashi, Yutaka ^a   Tanigawa, Kouko ^g   Nakanishi, Miki ^g   Nakamura, Tsuneaki ^h   Morimoto, Takashi ⁱ   Wakuri, Shinobu ^j   Okamoto, Yuko ^g   Sakaguchi, Mayumi ^b   Hayashi, Takumi ^d   Hanji, Takayuki ^f   Watanabe, Shinichi ^h  

^a KAO CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b POLA CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES INC   (Japan)

^c DOSHISHA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d KANEBO LTD   (Japan)

^e KYOTO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Japan)

^f Pias Corporation   (Japan)

^g Cutaneous Research Section   (Japan)

^h LION CORPORATION   (Japan)

ⁱ SUMITOMO CHEMICAL CO LTD   (Japan)

^j HATANO RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

more..

Author keywords

Alternative method; Eye irritation; GHS; SIRC cells; STE; Validation

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOUND; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; POLYSORBATE 80; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SOLVENT; THIOGLYCOLATE CALCIUM; THIOGLYCOLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL LINE; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CELL; CYTOTOXICITY TEST; EYE IRRITATION; GLOBALLY HARMONIZED SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHORT TIME EXPOSURE TEST; STANDARDIZATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 79955468216     PISSN: 08872333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adriaens E., Bytheway H., De Wever B., Eschrich D., Guest R., Hansen E., Vanparys P., Schoeters G., Warren N., Weltens R., Whittingham A., Remon J.P. Successful prevalidation of the slug mucosal irritation test to assess the eye irritation potency of chemicals. Toxicol. in Vitro 2008, 22:1285-1296.
2. Bagley D., Booman K.A., Bruner L.H., Casterton P.L., Demetrulias J., Heinze J., Innis J.D., Mccormick W.C., Neun D.J., Rothenstein A.S., Sedlak R.I. The SDA alternatives program phase III: comparison of in vitro data with animal eye irritation data on solvents, surfactants, oxidizing agents, and prototype cleaning products. J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocul. Toxicol. 1994, 13:127-155.
3. Balls M., Berg N., Bruner L.H., Curren R.D., De Silva O., Earl L.K., Esdaile D.J., Fentem J.H., Liebsch M., Ohno Y., Prinsen M.K., Spielmann H., Worth A.P. Eye irritation testing: the way forward, The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 34. Altern. Lab. Anim. 1999, 27:53-77.
4. Brantom P.G., Bruner L.H., Chamberlain M., De Silva O., Dupuis J., Earl L.K., Lovell D.P., Pape W.J., Uttley M., Bagley D.M., Baker F.W., Bracher M., Courtellemont P., Declercq L., Freeman S., Steiling W., Walker A.P., Carr G.J., Dami N., Thomas G., Harbell J., Jones P.A., Pfannenbecker U., Southee J.A., Tcheng M., Argembeaux H., Castelli D., Clothier R., Esdaile D.J., Itigaki H., Jung K., Kasai Y., Kojima H., Kristen U., Larnicol M., Lewis R.W., Marenus K., Moreno O., Peterson A., Rasmussen E.S., Robles C., Stern M. A summary report of the COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test. Toxicol. in Vitro 1997, 11:141-179.
5. Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003. Official Journal of the European Union, L66, pp. 26-35.
6. ECETOC, 1998. Eye Irritation Reference Chemicals Data Bank, second ed. Technical Report, No. 48(2).
7. ECVAM homepage. Avaliable from: http://ecvam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/page_pdf.cfm?voce=s&idvoce=120.
8. Eskes, C., Bessou, S., Bruner, L., Curren, R., Harbell, J., Jones, P., Kreiling, R., Liebsch, M., McNamee, P., Pape, W., Prinsen, M.K., Seidle, T., Vanparys, P., Worth, A., Zuang, V., 2005. Subchapter 3.3. Eye Irritation. In: Eskes, C., Zuang, V. (Eds.), Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: Current status and future prospects, A report prepared in the context of the 7th amendment to the cosmetics directive for establishing the timetable for phasing out animal testing. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, vol. 33, pp. 47-81.
9. Fleiss J.L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions 1981, John Wiley, New York, p. 321.
10. Gautheron P., Dukic M., Alix D., Sina J.F. Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: an in vitro assay of ocular irritancy. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1992, 18:442-449.
11. Goethem F.V., Adriaens E., Alepee N., Straube F., Wever B.D., Cappadoro M., Catoire S., Hansen E., Wolf A., Vanparys P. Prevalidation of a new in vitro reconstituted human cornea model to assess the eye irritating potential of chemicals. Toxicol. in Vitro 2006, 20:1-17.
12. Hagino S., Okazaki Y., Itagaki H. An in vitro tier evaluation for the identification of cosmetic ingredients which are not ocular irritants. Alternat. Lab. Anim. 2008, 36:641-652.
13. Harbell J.W., Koontz S.W., Lewis R.W., Lovell D., Acosta D. IRAG working group 4: cell cytotoxicity assays. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1997, 35:79-126.
14. McNamee P., Hibatallah J., Costabel-Farkas M., Goebel C., Araki D., Dufour E., Hewitt N.J., Jones P., Kirst A., Le Varlet B., Macfarlane M., Marrec-Fairley M., Rowland J., Schellauf F., Scheel J. A tired approach to the use of alternative to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: eye irritation. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009, 54:197-209.
15. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. Test No. 437: Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants. Paris, 2009. Available from: http://titania.sourceoecd.org/vl=2663626/cl=26/nw=1/rpsv/cgi-bin/fulltextew.pl?prpsv=/ij/oecdjournals/1607310x/v1n4/s54/p1.idx.
16. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. Test No. 438: Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants. Paris, 2009. Available from: http://titania.sourceoecd.org/vl=2663626/cl=26/nw=1/rpsv/cgi-bin/fulltextew.pl?prpsv=/ij/oecdjournals/1607310x/v1n4/s55/p1.idx.
17. Ohno Y., Kaneko T., Inoue T., Morikawa Y., Yoshida T., Fujii A., Masuda M., Ohno T., Hayashi M., Monma J., Uchiyama T., Chiba K., Ikeda N., Imanishi Y., Itagaki H., Kakishima H., Kasai Y., Kurishita A., Kojima H., Matsukawa K., Nakamura T., Ohkoshi K., Okumura H., Saijyo K., Sakamoto K., Suzuki T., Takano K., Tatsumi H., Tani N., Usami M., Watanabe R. Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation test for cosmetic ingredients. (1) Overview of the validation study and Draize scores for the evaluation of the tests. Toxicol. in Vitro 1999, 13:73-98.
18. Scott L., Eskes C., Hoffmann S., Adriaens E., Alepee N., Bufo M., Clothier R., Facchini D., Faller C., Guest R., Harbell J., Hartung T., Kamp H., Le Varlet B., Meloni M., McNamee P., Osborne R., Pape W., Pfannenbecker U., Prinsen M., Seaman C., Spielman H., Stokes W., Trouba K., Berghe C., Goethem F., Vassallo M., Vinardell P., Zuang V. A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches. Toxicol. in Vitro 2010, 24:1-9.
19. Takahashi Y., Koike M., Honda H., Ito Y., Sakaguchi H., Suzuki H., Nishiyama N. Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells. Toxicol. in Vitro 2008, 22:760-770.
20. Takahashi Y., Hayashi T., Watanabe S., Hayashi K., Koike M., Aisawa N., Ebata S., Sakaguchi H., Nakamura T., Kuwahara H., Nishiyama N. Inter-laboratory study of short time exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential of chemicals and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) classification. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2009, 34:611-626.
21. Takahashi Y., Hayashi T., Koike M., Sakaguchi H., Kuwahara H., Nishiyama N. An interlaboratory study of the short time exposure (STE) test using SIRC cells for predicting eye irritation potential. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol. 2010, 29:77-90.
22. United Nations, 2003. Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS), New York and Geneva (ST/SG/AC.10/30).