An interlaboratory study of the short time exposure (STE) test using SIRC cells for predicting eye irritation potential

Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 77-90

  Takahashi, Yutaka ^a   Hayashi, Takumi ^b   Koike, Mirei ^a   Sakaguchi, Hitoshi ^a   Kuwahara, Hirofumi ^b   Nishiyama, Naohiro ^a  

^a KAO CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b KANEBO LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

Alternative method; Draize test; Eye irritation; Interlaboratory study; Short time exposure test; STE test

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CELL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EYE IRRITATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY TEST; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT TIME EXPOSURE TEST;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CORNEA; EYE DISEASES; IRRITANTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RABBITS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 77952211466     PISSN: 15569527     EISSN: 15569535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/15569521003587327     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003, amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member states relating to cosmetic products. Off J Eur Union 2003; L66:26.
2. Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods. In vitro test methods for detecting ocular corrosives and severe irritants. Test Method Evaluation Report. November 2006. http://iccvam.niehs. nih.gov/methods/ ocutox/ivocutox/ocu-tmer.htm (accessed 16 January 2010).#1
3. European Centre for the Evaluation of Alternative Methods. ESAC statement on the conclusions of the ICCVAM retrospective study on organotypic in vitro assays as screening tests to identify potential ocular corrosives and severe irritants as determined by US EPA, EU (R41) and UN GHS classifications in a tiered testing strategy, as part of a weight of evidence approach. 2007. http://ecvam.jrc.it/ (accessed 16 January 2010).
4. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. Test No. 437: bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants. Paris, 2009. (OECD Test Guideline 437) http://lysander.sourceoecd.org/ vl=6097065/cl=18/nw=1/ rpsv/ij/oecdjournals/1607310x/ v1n4/s54/(accessed 16 January 2010).
5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. Test No. 438: isolated chicken eye test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants. Paris, 2009. (OECD Test Guideline 438) http://lysander.sourceoecd.org/vl=6097065/cl=18/nw=1/ rpsv/ij/oecdjournals/1607310x/v1n4/s55/ (accessed 16 January 2010).
6. Takahashi Y, Koike M, Honda H, Ito Y, Sakaguchi H, Hiroyuki S, et al. Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells. Toxicol In Vitro 2008; 22:760-770.
7. Bagley D, Booman KA, Bruner LH, Casterton PL, Demetrulias J, Heinze J, et al. The SDA Alternatives Program Phase III: comparison of in vitro data with animal eye irritation data on solvents, surfactants, oxidizing agents, and prototype cleaning products. J Toxicol Cutan Ocul Toxicol 1994; 13:127-155.
8. Harbell JW, Koontz SW, Lewis RW, Lovell D, Acosta D. IRAG Working Group 4: cell cytotoxicity assays. Food Chem Toxicol 1997; 35:79-126.
9. Ohno Y, Kaneko T, Inoue T, Morikawa Y, Yoshida T, Fujii A, et al. Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation test for cosmetic ingredients. (1) Overview of the validation study and Draize scores for the evaluation of the tests. Toxicol In Vitro 1999; 13:3-98.
10. Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944; 82:377-390.
11. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals. Eye Irritation Reference Chemicals Data Bank (Second Edition). Technical Report. No.48(2). Brussels, Belgium: ECETOC, 1998.
12. Goethem FV, Adriaens E, Alepee N, Straube F, Wever BD, Cappadoro M, et al. Prevalidation of a new in vitro reconstituted human cornea model to assess the eye irritating potential of chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro 2006; 20:1-17.
13. Kennah HE, Hignet S, Laux PE, Dorko D, Barrow CS. An objective procedure for quantitating eye irritation based upon changes of corneal thickness. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1989; 12:258-268.
14. Gautheron P, Giroux J, Cottin M, Audegond L, Morilla A, Mayordomo-Blanco L, et al. Interlaboratory assessment of the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 8:381-392.
15. Tani N, Kinoshita S, Okamoto Y, Kotani M, Itagaki H, Murakami N, et al. Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (8) Evaluation of cytotoxicity tests on SIRC cells. Toxicol In Vitro 1999; 13:175-187. (Pubitemid 29143343)
16. European Economic Community. Commission Directive 93/21/EEC of 27 April 1993 adapting to technical progress for 18th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labeling of dangerous substances, Annex IV. Off J Eur Communities 1993; L11OA:1-86.
17. United Nations. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), third revised edition. New York, NY, and Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations./author> (ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.3), 2009.
18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Series on testing and assessment Number 34: guidance document on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard assessment, ENJ/JM/ MONO. Paris, France: OECD, 2005, 14.
19. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, NY: John Wiley, 1981, 321.
20. Brantom PG, Bruner LH, Chamberlain M, Desilva O, Dupuis J, Earl LK, et al. A summary report of the COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test. Toxicol In Vitro 1997; 11:141-179.
21. Murphy JC, Osterberg RE, Seabaugh VM, Bierbower GW. Ocular irritancy responses to various pHs of acids and bases with and without irrigation. Toxicology 1982; 23:281-291.
22. Booman KA, Demetrias J, Driedger A, Griffith JF, Grochoski G, Kong B, et al. The SDA alternative program: comparison of in vitro data with Draize test data. J Toxicol Cutan Ocul Toxicol 1989; 8:35-49