Inter-laboratory study of short time exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential of chemicals and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) classification

Journal of Toxicological Sciences

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 611-626

  Takahashi, Yutaka ^a   Hayashi, Takumi ^b   Watanabe, Shinichi ^c   Hayashi, Kazuhiko ^a   Koike, Mirei ^a   Aisawa, Noriko ^c   Ebata, Shinya ^c   Sakaguchi, Hitoshi ^a   Nakamura, Tsuneaki ^c   Kuwahara, Hirofumi ^a   Nishiyama, Naohiro ^b  

^a KAO CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b KANEBO LTD   (Japan)

^c LION CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Alternative method; Eye irritation; GHS; Inter laboratory study; SIRC; STE

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; ALKALI; AMINE; ANIONIC SURFACTANT; CALCIUM; CARBOXYLIC ACID; CATIONIC SURFACTANT; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; ESTER; HYDROCARBON; INORGANIC COMPOUND; KETONE; POLYSORBATE 80; THIOGLYCOLIC ACID;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL LINE; CELL VIABILITY; CLASSIFICATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CELL; EXPOSURE; EYE IRRITATION; IN VIVO STUDY; LABORATORY; NONHUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; RABBIT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 73849118979     PISSN: 03881350     EISSN: 18803989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2131/jts.34.611     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Balls, M., Berg, N., Bruner, L.H., Curren, R.D., De Silva, O., Earl, L.K., Esdaile, D.J., Fentem, J.H., Liebsch, M., Ohno, Y., Prinsen, M.K., Spielmann, H. and Worth, A.P. (1999): Eye irritation testing: the way forward,The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 34. Altern. Lab. Anim., 27, 53-77.
2. Booman, K.A., De Prospo, J., Demetrulias, J., Driedger, A., Griffith, J.F., Grochoski, G., Kong, B., McCormick, W.C.3rd, North-Root, H., Rozen, M.G., and Sedlak, R.I. (1989): The sda alternatives program: comparison of in vitro data with draize test data. J. Toxicol. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol., 8, 35-49.
3. Brantom, P.G., Bruner, L.H., Chamberlain, M., De Silva, O., Dupuis, J., Earl, L.K., Lovell, D.P., Pape, W.J.W., Uttley, M., Bagley, D.M., Baker, F.W., Bracher, M., Courtellemont, P., Declercq, L., Freeman, S., Steiling, W., Walker, A.P., Carr, G.J., Dami, N., Thomas, G., Harbell, J., Jones, P.A., Pfannenbecker, U., Southee, J.A., Tcheng, M., Argembeaux, H., Castelli, D., Clothier, R., Esdaile, D.J., Itigaki, H., Jung, K., Kasai, Y., Kojima, H., Kristen, U., Larnicol, M., Lewis, R. W., Marenus, K., Moreno, O., Peterson, A., Rasmussen, E.S., Robles, C. and Stern, M. (1997): A summary report of the COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the draize rabbit eye irritation test. Toxicol. In Vitro, 11, 141-179.
4. Cooper, J.A.2nd, Saracci, R. and Cole, P. (1979): Describing the validity of carcinogen screening tests. Br. J. Cancer, 39, 87-89.
5. Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003. Official Journal of the European Union, L66, 26-35.
6. ECETOC (1998): Eye Irritation Reference Chemicals Data Bank (Second Edition). Technical Report No. 48.
7. Eskes, C., Bessou, S., Bruner, L., Curren, R., Harbell, J., Jones, P., Kreiling, R., Liebsch, M., McNamee, P., Pape, W., Prinsen, M.K., Seidle, T., Vanparys, P., Worth, A. and Zuang, V. (2005): Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects, 3.3. eye irritation. Altern. Lab. Anim., 33 (Suppl 1), 47-81.
8. Hagino, S., Okazaki, Y. and Itagaki, H. (2008): An in vitro tier evaluation for the identification of cosmetic ingredients whitch are not ocular irritants. Altern. Lab. Anim., 36, 641-652.
9. Itagaki, H., Hagino, S., Kato, S., Kobayashi, T. and Umeda, M. (1991): An in vitro alternative to the draize eye-irritation test: Evaluation of the crystal violet staining method. Toxicol. In Vitro, 5, 139-143.
10. IUCLID (2000): EU European Chemicals Bureau (ECB): International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID).
11. McNamee, P., Hibatallah, J., Costabel-Farkas, M., Goebel, C., Araki, D., Dufour, E., Hewitt, N.J., Jones, P., Kirst, A., Le Varlet, B., Macfarlane, M., Marrec-Fairley, M., Rowland, J., Schellauf, F. and Scheel, J. (2009): A tired approach to the use of alternative to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: Eye irritation. Regulat. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 54, 197-209.
12. NICEATM (2006): Current status of in vitro test methods for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants: Hen's Egg Test - Chorioallantoic Membrane Test Method Background Review Document, March 2006.
13. OECD (2005): Series on testing and assessment Number 34, ENJ/JM/MONO, 14.
14. Ohno, Y., Kaneko, T., Inoue, T., Morikawa, Y., Yoshida, T., Fujii, A., Matsuda, M., Ohno, T., Hayashi, M., Momma, J., Uchiyama, T., Chiba, K., Ikeda, N., Imanishi, Y., Itagaki, H., Kakishima, H., Kasai, Y., Kurishita, A., Kojima, H., Matsukawa, K., Nakamura, T., Ohkoshi, K., Okumura, H., Saijo, K., Sakamoto, K., Suzuki, T., Takano, K., Tutsumi, H., Tani, N., Usami, M. and Watanabe, R. (1999): Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (1) Overview of the validation study and draize scores for the evaluation of the tests. Toxicol. In Vitro, 13, 73-98.
15. Okamoto, Y., Kanzaki, N. and Tanaka, N. (1990): Studies of an in vitro alternative method to the draize rabbit eye irritation test. Nihonkeshohingijutsushakaishi (J. Soc. Cosmet. chem. Japan), 23, 272-279.
16. Scott, L., Eskes, C., Hoffmann, S., Adriaens, E., Alepee, N., Bufo, M., Clothier, R., Facchini, D., Faller, C., Guest, R., Harbell, J., Hartung, T., Kamp, H., Le Varlet, B., Meloni, M., McNamee, P., Osborne, R., Pape, W., Pfannenbecker, U., Prinsen, M., Seaman, C., Spielman, H., Stokes, W., Trouba, K., Van den Berghe, C., Van Goethem, F., Vassallo, M., Vinardell, P. and Zuang, V. (2009): A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches. Toxicol. In Vitro, (in press).
17. Takahashi, Y. (2007): Usefulness of Short Time Exposure (STE) method for evaluation of eye irritation potential of cosmetic ingredients. FRAGRANCE JOURNAL, 10, 35-42.
18. Takahashi, Y., Koike, M., Honda, H., Ito, Y., Sakaguchi, H., Suzuki, H. and Nishiyama, N. (2008): Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: An in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells. Toxicol. In Vitro, 22, 760-770.
19. Tani, N., Kinoshita, S., Okamoto, Y., Kotani, M., Itagaki, H., Murakami, N., Sugiura, S., Usami, M., Kato, K., Kojima, H., Ohno, T., Saijo, K., Kato, M., Hayashi, M. and Ohno, Y. (1999): Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tetsts for cosmetic ingredients. (8) Evaluation of cytotoxicity tests on SIRC cells. Toxicol. In Vitro, 13, 175-187.
20. United Nations (2003): Globally harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS), New York & Geneva (ST/SG/AC.10/30).
21. Van Goethem, F., Adriaens, E., Alépée, N., Straube, F., De Wever, B., Cappadoro, M., Catoire, S., Hansen, E., Wolf, A. and Vanparys, P. (2006): Prevalidation of a new in vitro reconstituted human cornea model to assess the eye irritating potential of chemicals. Toxicol. In Vitro, 20, 1-17.
22. Wilhelm, K.P., Böttjer, B. and Siegers, C.P. (2001): Quantitative assessment of primary skin irritants in vivo in a cytotoxicity model: comparison with in vitro human irritation tests. Br. J. Dermatol., 145, 709-715.