Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: An in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells

Toxicology in Vitro

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 760-770

  Takahashi, Yutaka ^a   Koike, Mirei ^a   Honda, Hiroshi ^a   Ito, Yuichi ^a   Sakaguchi, Hitoshi ^a   Suzuki, Hiroyuki ^a   Nishiyama, Naohiro ^a  

^a KAO CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Alternative method; Draize test; Eye irritation; Ingredients; Prediction model; Short time exposure test; SIRC cell line

Indexed keywords

HEXANOL; MINERAL OIL; OCTANOL; SOLVENT; TOLUENE;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL LINE; CELL STRAIN SIRC; CELL VIABILITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CORNEA CELL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYTOTOXICITY TEST; DRAIZE TEST; DRUG EXPOSURE; EYE IRRITATION; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; RABBIT; RANK SUM TEST; SHORT TIME EXPOSURE TEST; TOXICITY TESTING;

ACIDS; AMINES; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; CORNEA; EYE DISEASES; IRRITANTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RABBITS; SOLUBILITY; SOLVENTS;

ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 40049097813     PISSN: 08872333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Balls M., Berg N., Bruner L.H., Curren R.D., Silva O., Earl L.K., Esdaile D.J., Fentem J.H., Liebsch M., Ohno Y., Prinsen M.K., Spielmann H., and Worth A.P. Eye irritation testing: the way forward. The Report and Recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 34. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 27 (1999) 53-77
2. Bagley D., Booman K.A., Bruner L.H., Casterton P.L., Demetrulias J., Heinze J., Innis J.D., McCormick III W.C., Neun D.J., Rothenstein A.S., and Sedlak R.I. The SDA alternatives program phase III comparison of in vitro data with animal eye irritation data on solvents, surfactants, oxidizing agents, and prototype cleaning products. Journal of Toxicology Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology 13 (1994) 127-155
3. Booman K.A., Demetrias J., Driedger A., Griffith J.F., Grochoski G., Kong B., McCormick III W.C., North-Root H., Rosen M.G., and Sedlak R.I. The SDA alternative program: comparison of in vitro data with Draize test data. Journal of Toxicology Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology 8 (1989) 35-49
4. Bruner L.H., Kain D.J., Roberts D.A., and Parker R.D. Evaluation of seven in vitro alternatives for ocular safety testing. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 17 (1991) 136-149
5. ECETOC (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals), 1998. Eye Irritation Reference Chemicals Data Bank, second ed. Technical Report No. 48(2).
6. EEC. Commission Directive 93/21/EEC of 27 April 1993 adapting to technical progress for the 18th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labeling of dangerous substances, Annex IV. Official Journal of the European Communities L11OA (1993) 1-86
7. Eskes C., Bessou S., Bruner L., Curren R., Harbell J., Jones P., Kreiling R., Liebsch M., McNamee P., Pape W., Prinsen M.K., Seidle T., Vanparys P., Worth A., and Zuang V. Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects, 3.3. eye irritation. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 33 (2005) 47-81
8. EU, 2003. Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (7th Amendment to the European Cosmetics Directive). Official Journal of European Union. L66, 26-35.
9. Gautheron P., Dukic M., Alix D., and Sina J.F. Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: an in vitro assay of ocular irritancy. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 18 (1992) 442-449
10. Gettings S.D., Lordo R.A., Hintze K.L., Bagley D.M., Casterton P.L., Chudkowski M., Curren R.D., Demetrulias J.L., Dipasquale L.C., Earl L.K., Feder P.I., Gall C.L., Glaza S.M., Gordon V.C., Janus J., Kurtz P.J., Marenus K.D., Moral J., Pape W.J.W., Renskers K.J., Rheins L.A., Roddy M.T., Rozen M.G., Tedeschi J.P., and Zyracki J. The CTFA evaluation of alternatives program: an evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase III) surfactant-based formulations. Food and Chemical Toxicology 34 (1996) 79-117
11. Goethem F.V., Adriaens E., Alepee N., Straube F., Wever B.D., Cappadoro M., Catoire S., Hansen E., Wolf A., and Vanparys P. Prevalidation of a new in vitro reconstituted human cornea model to assess the eye irritating potential of chemicals. Toxicology in Vitro 20 (2006) 1-17
12. Hagino S., Kinoshita S., Tani N., Nakamura T., Ono N., Konishi K., Iimura H., Kojima H., and Ohno Y. Interlaboratory validation of in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (2) Chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) test. Toxicology in Vitro 13 (1999) 99-113
13. Harbell J.W., Koontz S.W., Lewis R.W., Lovell D., and Acosta D. IRAG working group 4: cell cytotoxicity assays. Food and Chemical Toxicology 35 (1997) 79-126
14. Kaneko T. Importance of reevaluation on existing method in validation of alternative method - a case of Draize test. Soshiki baiyou 22 (1996) 218-223
15. Kojima H. Alternative eye irritation test methods - cytotoxicity tests. Fragrance Journal 7 (1999) 27-34
16. Lagarto A., Vega R., Vega Y., Guerra I., and Gonzalez R. Comparative study of red blood cell method in rat and calves blood as alternatives of Draize eye irritation test. Toxicology in Vitro 20 (2006) 529-533
17. Maurer J.K., Parker R.D., and Jester J.V. Extent of initial corneal injury as the mechanistic basis for ocular irritation: key findings and recommendations for the development of alternative assays. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 36 (2002) 106-117
18. Mikkelson T.J., Chrai S.S., and Robinson J.R. Altered bioavailability of drugs in the eye due to drug-protein interaction. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 62 (1973) 1648-1653
19. Motose, K., 1984. Bioavailability of eye drops and eye lotion. Nanzando, Tokyo, pp. 179-185.
20. Murphy J.C., Osterberg R.E., Seabaugh V.M., and Bierbower G.W. Ocular irritancy responses to various pHs of acids and bases with and without irrigation. Toxicology 12 (1982) 281-291
21. Ohno Y. Validation of alternative methods to Draize eye irritation test. Soshiki baiyou 22 (1996) 211-217
22. Ohno H. Guidance draft for evaluation of eye irritation potential of cosmetics incorporating alternative methods. Trend and the present state of studies on alternatives to animal experiments. Fragrance Journal 7 (1999) 21-26
23. Ohno Y., Kaneko T., Inoue T., Morikawa Y., Yoshida T., Fujii A., Masuda M., Ohno T., Hayashi M., Monma J., Uchiyama T., Chiba K., Ikeda N., Imanishi Y., Itagaki H., Kakishima H., Kasai Y., Kurishita A., Kojima H., Matsukawa K., Nakamura T., Ohkoshi K., Okumura H., Saijyo K., Sakamoto K., Suzuki T., Takano K., Tatsumi H., Tani N., Usami M., and Watanabe R. Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation test for cosmetic ingredients. (1) Overview of the validation study and Draize scores for the evaluation of the tests. Toxicology in Vitro 13 (1999) 73-98
24. Reader S.J., Blackwell V., O'Hara R., Clothier R.H., Griffin G., and Balls M. Neutral red release from pre-loaded cells as an in vitro approach to testing for eye irritancy potential. Toxicology in Vitro 4 (1990) 264-266
25. Tani N., Kinoshita S., Okamoto Y., Kotani M., Itagaki H., Murakami N., Sugiura S., Usami M., Kato K., Kojima H., Ohno T., Saijyo K., Kato M., Hayashi M., and Ohno Y. Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation test for cosmetic ingredients. (8) Evaluation of cytotoxicity tests on SIRC cells. Toxicology in Vitro 13 (1999) 175-187
26. Tchao R. Trans-epithlial permeability of fluorescein in vitro as an assay to determine eye irritatnts. In: Goldberg A.M. (Ed). Alternative Methods in Toxicology vol. 6 (1998), Mary Ann Liebert Inc., New York 271-283
27. United Nations, 2003. Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS); New York & Geneva (ST/SG/AC.10/30). Available from: .