Making new out of old: Recycling and modification of an ancient protein translocation system during eukaryotic evolution

BioEssays

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 368-376

  Bolte, Kathrin ^a   Gruenheit, Nicole ^b   Felsner, Gregor ^a   Sommer, Maik S ^c   Maier, Uwe G ^a,d   Hempel, Franziska ^a,d  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^c GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d Unit of Metabolism   (Germany)

Author keywords

ERAD; Evolution of protein translocation; Peroxisomal importomer; Secondary plastid; SELMA

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE;

CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CYTOSOL; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; EUKARYOTE EVOLUTION; EUKARYOTIC CELL; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GENE TRANSLOCATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR IMPORT; PEROXISOMAL TARGETING SIGNAL; PEROXISOME; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CYTOSOL; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PEROXISOMES; PLASTIDS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 79954779971     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201100007     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Gould SB, Waller RF, McFadden GI. 2008. Plastid evolution. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 491-517.
2. Bohnsack MT, Schleiff E. 2010. The evolution of protein targeting and translocation systems. Biochim Biophys Acta 1803: 1115-30.
3. Tartakoff AM, Tao T. 2010. Comparative and evolutionary aspects of macromolecular translocation across membranes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 42: 214-29.
4. Driessen AJ, Nouwen N. 2008. Protein translocation across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 643-67.
5. Osborne AR, Rapoport TA, van den Berg B. 2005. Protein translocation by the Sec61/SecY channel. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21: 529-50.
6. Rapoport TA. 2007. Protein translocation across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial plasma membranes. Nature 450: 663-9.
7. Bolter B, Soll J, Schulz A, Hinnah S, et al. 1998. Origin of a chloroplast protein importer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 15831-6.
8. Reumann S, Davila-Aponte J, Keegstra K. 1999. The evolutionary origin of the protein-translocating channel of chloroplastic envelope membranes: identification of a cyanobacterial homolog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 784-9.
9. Gross J, Bhattacharya D. 2009. Revaluating the evolution of the Toc and Tic protein translocons. Trends Plant Sci 14: 13-20.
10. Reumann S, Keegstra K. 1999. The endosymbiotic origin of the protein import machinery of chloroplastic envelope membranes. Trends Plant Sci 4: 302-7.
11. Gutensohn M, Fan E, Frielingsdorf S, Hanner P, et al. 2006. Toc, Tic, Tat et al.: structure and function of protein transport machineries in chloroplasts. J Plant Physiol 163: 333-47.
12. Dolezal P, Likic V, Tachezy J, Lithgow T. 2006. Evolution of the molecular machines for protein import into mitochondria. Science 313: 314-8.
13. Zeth K. 2010. Structure and evolution of mitochondrial outer membrane proteins of beta-barrel topology. Biochim Biophys Acta 1797: 1292-9.
14. Bagola K, Mehnert M, Jarosch E, Sommer T. 2011. Protein dislocation from the ER. Biochim Biophys Acta 1808: 925-36.
15. Meusser B, Hirsch C, Jarosch E, Sommer T. 2005. ERAD: the long road to destruction. Nat Cell Biol 7: 766-72.
16. Nakatsukasa K, Brodsky JL. 2008. The recognition and retrotranslocation of misfolded proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Traffic 9: 861-70.
17. Gabaldón T, Snel B, van Zimmeren F, Hemrika W, et al. 2006. Origin and evolution of the peroxisomal proteome. Biol Direct 1: 8.
18. Schliebs W, Girzalsky W, Erdmann R. 2010. Peroxisomal protein import and ERAD: variations on a common theme. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 885-90.
19. Schluter A, Fourcade S, Ripp R, Mandel JL, et al. 2006. The evolutionary origin of peroxisomes: an ER-peroxisome connection. Mol Biol Evol 23: 838-45.
20. Gabaldón T. 2010. Peroxisome diversity and evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365: 765-73.
21. Felsner G, Sommer MS, Gruenheit N, Hempel F, et al. 2011. ERAD components in organisms with complex red plastids suggest recruitment of a preexisting protein transport pathway for the periplastid membrane. Genome Biol Evol 3: 140-50.
22. Hempel F, Bullmann L, Lau J, Zauner S, et al. 2009. ERAD-derived preprotein transport across the second outermost plastid membrane of diatoms. Mol Biol Evol 26: 1781-90.
23. Kalanon M, Tonkin CJ, McFadden GI. 2009. Characterization of two putative protein translocation components in the apicoplast of Plasmodium falciparum Eukaryot Cell 8: 1146-54.
24. Sommer MS, Gould SB, Lehmann P, Gruber A, et al. 2007. Der1-mediated preprotein import into the periplastid compartment of chromalveolates? Mol Biol Evol 24: 918-28.
25. Spork S, Hiss JA, Mandel K, Sommer M, et al. 2009. An unusual ERAD-like complex is targeted to the apicoplast of Plasmodium falciparum Eukaryot Cell 8: 1134-45.
26. Agrawal S, van Dooren GG, Beatty WL, Striepen B. 2009. Genetic evidence that an endosymbiont-derived endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) system functions in import of apicoplast proteins. J Biol Chem 284: 33683-91.
27. Carvalho P, Goder V, Rapoport TA. 2006. Distinct ubiquitin-ligase complexes define convergent pathways for the degradation of ER proteins. Cell 126: 361-73.
28. Bhamidipati A, Denic V, Quan EM, Weissman JS. 2005. Exploration of the topological requirements of ERAD identifies Yos9p as a lectin sensor of misfolded glycoproteins in the ER lumen. Mol Cell 19: 741-51.
29. Buschhorn BA, Kostova Z, Medicherla B, Wolf DH. 2004. A genome-wide screen identifies Yos9p as essential for ER-associated degradation of glycoproteins. FEBS Lett 577: 422-6.
30. Denic V, Quan EM, Weissman JS. 2006. A luminal surveillance complex that selects misfolded glycoproteins for ER-associated degradation. Cell 126: 349-59.
31. Gardner RG, Swarbrick GM, Bays NW, Cronin SR, et al. 2000. Endoplasmic reticulum degradation requires lumen to cytosol signaling. Transmembrane control of Hrd1p by Hrd3p. J Cell Biol 151: 69-82.
32. Hebert DN, Bernasconi R, Molinari M. 2010. ERAD substrates: which way out? Semin Cell Dev Biol 21: 526-32.
33. Bays NW, Gardner RG, Seelig LP, Joazeiro CA, et al. 2001. Hrd1p/Der3p is a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase required for ER-associated degradation. Nat Cell Biol 3: 24-9.
34. Bordallo J, Plemper RK, Finger A, Wolf DH. 1998. Der3p/Hrd1p is required for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of misfolded lumenal and integral membrane proteins. Mol Biol Cell 9: 209-22.
35. Deak PM, Wolf DH. 2001. Membrane topology and function of Der3/Hrd1p as a ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3) involved in endoplasmic reticulum degradation. J Biol Chem 276: 10663-9.
36. McGrath JP, Jentsch S, Varshavsky A. 1991. UBA 1: an essential yeast gene encoding ubiquitin-activating enzyme. EMBO J 10: 227-36.
37. Friedlander R, Jarosch E, Urban J, Volkwein C, et al. 2000. A regulatory link between ER-associated protein degradation and the unfolded-protein response. Nat Cell Biol 2: 379-84.
38. Hirsch C, Gauss R, Horn SC, Neuber O, et al. 2009. The ubiquitylation machinery of the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 458: 453-60.
39. Kostova Z, Tsai YC, Weissman AM. 2007. Ubiquitin ligases, critical mediators of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 18: 770-9.
40. de Virgilio M, Weninger H, Ivessa NE. 1998. Ubiquitination is required for the retro-translocation of a short-lived luminal endoplasmic reticulum glycoprotein to the cytosol for degradation by the proteasome. J Biol Chem 273: 9734-43.
41. Shamu CE, Flierman D, Ploegh HL, Rapoport TA, et al. 2001. Polyubiquitination is required for US11-dependent movement of MHC class I heavy chain from endoplasmic reticulum into cytosol. Mol Biol Cell 12: 2546-55.
42. Bays NW, Hampton RY. 2002. Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4: stuck in the middle with Ub. Curr Biol 12: R366-71.
43. Jarosch E, Taxis C, Volkwein C, Bordallo J, et al. 2002. Protein dislocation from the ER requires polyubiquitination and the AAA-ATPase Cdc48. Nat Cell Biol 4: 134-9.
44. Ye Y, Meyer HH, Rapoport TA. 2001. The AAA ATPase Cdc48/p97 and its partners transport proteins from the ER into the cytosol. Nature 414: 652-6.
45. Ye Y, Meyer HH, Rapoport TA. 2003. Function of the p97-Ufd1-Npl4 complex in retrotranslocation from the ER to the cytosol: dual recognition of nonubiquitinated polypeptide segments and polyubiquitin chains. J Cell Biol 162: 71-84.
46. Rouiller I, Butel VM, Latterich M, Milligan RA, et al. 2000. A major conformational change in p97 AAA ATPase upon ATP binding. Mol Cell 6: 1485-90.
47. Zhang X, Shaw A, Bates PA, Newman RH, et al. 2000. Structure of the AAA ATPase p97. Mol Cell 6: 1473-84.
48. White SR, Lauring B. 2007. AAA+ATPases: achieving diversity of function with conserved machinery. Traffic 8: 1657-67.
49. Meyer HH, Shorter JG, Seemann J, Pappin D, et al. 2000. A complex of mammalian ufd1 and npl4 links the AAA-ATPase, p97, to ubiquitin and nuclear transport pathways. EMBO J 19: 2181-92.
50. Neuber O, Jarosch E, Volkwein C, Walter J, et al. 2005. Ubx2 links the Cdc48 complex to ER-associated protein degradation. Nat Cell Biol 7: 993-8.
51. Schuberth C, Buchberger A. 2005. Membrane-bound Ubx2 recruits Cdc48 to ubiquitin ligases and their substrates to ensure efficient ER-associated protein degradation. Nat Cell Biol 7: 999-1006.
52. Agne B, Meindl NM, Niederhoff K, Einwachter H, et al. 2003. Pex8p: an intraperoxisomal organizer of the peroxisomal import machinery. Mol Cell 11: 635-46.
53. Walton PA, Hill PE, Subramani S. 1995. Import of stably folded proteins into peroxisomes. Mol Biol Cell 6: 675-83.
54. Glover JR, Andrews DW, Rachubinski RA. 1994. Saccharomyces cerevisiae peroxisomal thiolase is imported as a dimer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 10541-5.
55. McNew JA, Goodman JM. 1994. An oligomeric protein is imported into peroxisomes in vivo. J Cell Biol 127: 1245-57.
56. Elgersma Y, Vos A, van den Berg M, van Roermund CW, et al. 1996. Analysis of the carboxyl-terminal peroxisomal targeting signal 1 in a homologous context in Saccharomyces cerevisiae J Biol Chem 271: 26375-82.
57. Gatto GJ, Jr, Geisbrecht BV, Gould SJ, Berg JM. 2000. Peroxisomal targeting signal-1 recognition by the TPR domains of human PEX5. Nat Struct Biol 7: 1091-5.
58. Gould SJ, Keller GA, Hosken N, Wilkinson J, et al. 1989. A conserved tripeptide sorts proteins to peroxisomes. J Cell Biol 108: 1657-64.
59. Lametschwandtner G, Brocard C, Fransen M, Van Veldhoven P, et al. 1998. The difference in recognition of terminal tripeptides as peroxisomal targeting signal 1 between yeast and human is due to different affinities of their receptor Pex5p to the cognate signal and to residues adjacent to it. J Biol Chem 273: 33635-43.
60. Swinkels BW, Gould SJ, Bodnar AG, Rachubinski RA, et al. 1991. A novel, cleavable peroxisomal targeting signal at the amino-terminus of the rat 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase. EMBO J 10: 3255-62.
61. Erdmann R, Schliebs W. 2005. Peroxisomal matrix protein import: the transient pore model. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 738-42.
62. Meinecke M, Cizmowski C, Schliebs W, Kruger V, et al. 2010. The peroxisomal importomer constitutes a large and highly dynamic pore. Nat Cell Biol 12: 273-7.
63. Gouveia AM, Guimaraes CP, Oliveira ME, Reguenga C, et al. 2003. Characterization of the peroxisomal cycling receptor, Pex5p, using a cell-free in vitro import system. J Biol Chem 278: 226-32.
64. Gouveia AM, Reguenga C, Oliveira ME, Sa-Miranda C, et al. 2000. Characterization of peroxisomal Pex5p from rat liver. Pex5p in the Pex5p-Pex14p membrane complex is a transmembrane protein. J Biol Chem 275: 32444-51.
65. Wang D, Visser NV, Veenhuis M, van der Klei IJ. 2003. Physical interactions of the peroxisomal targeting signal 1 receptor pex5p, studied by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J Biol Chem 278: 43340-5.
66. Carvalho AF, Pinto MP, Grou CP, Alencastre IS, et al. 2007. Ubiquitination of mammalian Pex5p, the peroxisomal import receptor. J Biol Chem 282: 31267-72.
67. Williams C, van den Berg M, Sprenger RR, Distel B. 2007. A conserved cysteine is essential for Pex4p-dependent ubiquitination of the peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p. J Biol Chem 282: 22534-43.
68. Richly H, Rape M, Braun S, Rumpf S, et al. 2005. A series of ubiquitin binding factors connects CDC48/p97 to substrate multiubiquitylation and proteasomal targeting. Cell 120: 73-84.
69. Koegl M, Hoppe T, Schlenker S, Ulrich HD, et al. 1999. A novel ubiquitination factor, E4, is involved in multiubiquitin chain assembly. Cell 96: 635-44.
70. Platta HW, El Magraoui F, Schlee D, Grunau S, et al. 2007. Ubiquitination of the peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p is required for its recycling. J Cell Biol 177: 197-204.
71. Kiel JA, Emmrich K, Meyer HE, Kunau WH. 2005. Ubiquitination of the peroxisomal targeting signal type 1 receptor, Pex5p, suggests the presence of a quality control mechanism during peroxisomal matrix protein import. J Biol Chem 280: 1921-30.
72. Platta HW, El Magraoui F, Baumer BE, Schlee D, et al. 2009. Pex2 and Pex12 function as protein-ubiquitin ligases in peroxisomal protein import. Mol Cell Biol 29: 5505-16.
73. Williams C, van den Berg M, Geers E, Distel B. 2008. Pex10p functions as an E3 ligase for the Ubc4p-dependent ubiquitination of Pex5p. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 374: 620-4.
74. Pickart CM. 2001. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu Rev Biochem 70: 503-33.
75. Miyata N, Fujiki Y. 2005. Shuttling mechanism of peroxisome targeting signal type 1 receptor Pex5: ATP-independent import and ATP-dependent export. Mol Cell Biol 25: 10822-32.
76. Platta HW, Grunau S, Rosenkranz K, Girzalsky W, et al. 2005. Functional role of the AAA peroxins in dislocation of the cycling PTS1 receptor back to the cytosol. Nat Cell Biol 7: 817-22.
77. Elgersma Y, Kwast L, van den Berg M, Snyder WB, et al. 1997. Overexpression of Pex15p, a phosphorylated peroxisomal integral membrane protein required for peroxisome assembly in S. cerevisiae, causes proliferation of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. EMBO J 16: 7326-41.
78. Matsumoto N, Tamura S, Fujiki Y. 2003. The pathogenic peroxin Pex26p recruits the Pex1p-Pex6p AAA ATPase complexes to peroxisomes. Nat Cell Biol 5: 454-60.
79. Bolte K, Bullmann L, Hempel F, Bozarth A, et al. 2009. Protein targeting into secondary plastids. J Eukaryot Microbiol 56: 9-15.
80. Agrawal S, Striepen B. 2010. More membranes, more proteins: complex protein import mechanisms into secondary plastids. Protist 161: 672-87.
81. Cavalier-Smith T. 1999. Principles of protein and lipid targeting in secondary symbiogenesis: euglenoid, dinoflagellate, and sporozoan plastid origins and the eukaryote family tree. J Eukaryot Microbiol 46: 347-66.
82. Bullmann L, Haarmann R, Mirus O, Bredemeier R, et al. 2010. Filling the gap, evolutionarily conserved Omp85 in plastids of chromalveolates. J Biol Chem 285: 6848-56.
83. van Dooren GG, Tomova C, Agrawal S, Humbel BM, et al. 2008. Toxoplasma gondii Tic20 is essential for apicoplast protein import. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 13574-9.
84. Hempel F, Bozarth A, Sommer MS, Zauner S, et al. 2007. Transport of nuclear-encoded proteins into secondarily evolved plastids. Biol Chem 388: 899-906.
85. Hempel F, Felsner G, Maier UG. 2010. New mechanistic insights into pre-protein transport across the second outermost plastid membrane of diatoms. Mol Microbiol 76: 793-801.
86. Schafer A, Wolf DH. 2009. Sec61p is part of the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation machinery. EMBO J 28: 2874-84.
87. Wiertz EJ, Tortorella D, Bogyo M, Yu J, et al. 1996. Sec61-mediated transfer of a membrane protein from the endoplasmic reticulum to the proteasome for destruction. Nature 384: 432-8.
88. Willer M, Forte GM, Stirling CJ. 2008. Sec61p is required for ERAD-L: genetic dissection of the translocation and ERAD-L functions of Sec61P using novel derivatives of CPY. J Biol Chem 283: 33883-8.
89. Gabaldón T, Capella-Gutierrez S. 2010. Lack of phylogenetic support for a supposed actinobacterial origin of peroxisomes. Gene 465: 61-5.
90. Hoepfner D, Schildknegt D, Braakman I, Philippsen P, et al. 2005. Contribution of the endoplasmic reticulum to peroxisome formation. Cell 122: 85-95.
91. Soding J. 2005. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 21: 951-60.
92. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 3059-66.
93. Capella-Gutierrez S, Silla-Martinez JM, Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25: 1972-3.
94. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52: 696-704.