Antecedents to job success in business process management: A comparison of two models

Information Resources Management Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 46-55

  Goeke, Richard J ^a   Antonucci, Yvonne L ^a  

^a WIDENER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Business process management; Human factors; Individual differences; Intelligence; Performance

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; HUMAN FACTORS; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; INTELLIGENCE; PERFORMANCE;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79954624872     PISSN: 10401628     EISSN: 15337979     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2011010104     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Adamides, E. D., & Karacapilidis, N. (2006). A knowledge centred framework for collaborative business process modeling. Business Process Management Journal, 12(5), 557-575. doi:10.1108/14637150610690993 (Pubitemid 44395697)
2. Antonucci, Y. L., Boykin, D., & Donahue, K. (2009). Wyeth Pharmaceuticals: In pursuit of process excellence. In Snabe, J. H., Rosenberg, A., Moller, C., & Scavillo, M. (Eds.), Business process management: The SAP roadmap (pp. 319-344). Boston: Galileo Press.
3. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2000). Select on conscientiousness and emotional stability. In Locke, E. A. (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
5. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Gupta, R. (2003). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland's occupational types. Personnel Psychology, 56, 45-74. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570. 2003.tb00143.x (Pubitemid 36412622)
6. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1-2), 9-30. doi:10.1111/1468- 2389.00160 (Pubitemid 33324895)
7. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team process and team effectiveness
8. Bass B. M., & Bass, R., 2008 Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
9. Briggs, S. R. (1992). Assessing the five-factor model of personality description. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 253-293. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494. 1992. tb00974.x
10. Cascio, W. F. (2006). Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
11. Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1993). 16 Personality Factor Inventory (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: The Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
12. Conley, J. J. (1985). Longitudinal stability of personality traits: A multitrait-multimethod-multioccasion analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(5), 1266-1282. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.49.5.1266
13. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A 6-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 853-863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.853
14. Davenport, T. H. (1993). Integrate process reengineering and TQM. Planning Review, 21(3), 6-12.
15. Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 11-27.
16. Demming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Deveraj, S., Easley, R. F., & Crant, J. M. (2008). How does personality matter? Relating the Five-Factor model to technology acceptance and use. Information Systems Research, 19(1), 93-105. doi:10.1287/ isre.1070.0153
18. Dunn, W. S., Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in manager's judgements of applicant qualifications. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 500-509. doi:10.1037/0021- 9010.80.4.500
19. Eicker, S., Kochbeck, J., & Schuler, P. (2008). Employee competencies for business process management. Paper presented at the International Conference on Business Information Systems, Innsbruck, Austria.
20. Fingar, P. (2006). The MBA is dead, long live the MBI. BPTrends, 4(12), 1-7.
21. Garvin, D. A. (1995). Leveraging processes for strategic advantage. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 76-90.
22. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In Wheeler, L. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-166). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
24. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590. 4.1.26
25. Gough, H. (1988). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
26. Gough, H. (1990). Testing for leadership with the California Psychological Inventory. In Clark, K. E., & Clark, M. B. (Eds.), Measures of leadership (pp. 355-379). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.
27. Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. G. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 795-824). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012134645- 4/50031-7
28. Grover, V., Jeong, S., Kettinger, W., & Teng, J. (1995). The implementation of business process reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 109-144.
29. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Singapore: Pearson Education.
30. Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 104-112.
31. Hammer, M. (2007). The process audit. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), 111-123.
32. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for reengineering business revolution. New York: Harper.
33. Harmon, P. (2004). Evaluating an organization's business process maturity. BP Trends, 2(3), 1-11.
34. Hill, J. B., Sinur, J., Flint, D., & Melenovsky, M. J. (2006). Gartner's position on business process management (Rep. No. G00136533). Stamford, CT: Gartner Research.
35. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Hough, L. M., & Furnham, A. (2002). Importance and use of personality variables in work settings. In Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology (pp. 131-169). New York: Wiley.
37. Hung, R. Y.-Y. (2006). Business process management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Total Quality Management, 17(1), 21-40. doi:10.1080/14783360500249836 (Pubitemid 43000498)
38. Hunter, J. E. (1980). Test validation for 12,000 jobs: An application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
39. Hunter, J. E. (1983). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisory ratings. In Landy, F., Zedeck, S., & Cleveland, J. (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 257-266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29(3), 340-362. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(86)90013-8
41. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72-98. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72
42. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-Factor model of personality and transformational leadership. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751-765. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751
43. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765-780. doi:10.1037/0021- 9010.87.4.765
44. Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621-652. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x
45. Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
46. Kettinger, W. J., Teng, J. T. C., & Guha, S. (1997). Business process change: A study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(1), 55-79. doi:10.2307/249742 (Pubitemid 127709791)
47. Levine, E. L., & Flory, A. (1975). Evaluation of job applicants: A conceptual framework. Public Personnel Management, 4, 378-385.
48. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258-1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
49. McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 323-337. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.323 (Pubitemid 126448049)
50. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding liebe und arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 227-232. doi:10.1177/014616729101700217
51. McDaniel, M. A., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1988). Job experience correlates of job performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 327-330. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.327
52. McKeithen, K. B., Reitman, J. S., Rueter, H. H., & Hirtle, S. C. (1981). Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers. Cognitive Psychology, 13(3), 307-325. doi:10.1016/0010- 0285(81)90012-8
53. Melenovsky, M. J. (2005). Align roles and responsibilities to make BPM work(Rep. No. G00127680). Stamford, CT: Gartner Research.
54. Melenovsky, M. J., & Hill, J. B. (2006). Role definition and organizational structure: Business Process Improvement (Rep. No. G00141487). Stamford, CT: Gartner Research.
55. Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The big five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practices in human resource management . In Ferris, G. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 13, pp. 153-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
56. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the Big Five personality factors. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 272-280. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.272
57. Paim, R., Caulliraux, H. M., & Cardoso, R. (2008). Process management tasks: a conceptual and practical view. Business Process Management Journal, 14(5), 694-723. doi:10.1108/14637150810903066
58. Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training criteria in clerical positions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(4), 373-407. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.373
59. Peterson, R. A. (2000). Constructing effective questionnaires. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. doi:10.1037/0021- 9010.88.5.879 (Pubitemid 37239703)
61. Ranganathan, C., Seo, D., & Babad, Y. (2006). Switching behavior of mbile users: do users' relational investments and demographics matter? European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 269-276. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis. 3000616 (Pubitemid 44146925)
62. Ravesteyn, P., Batenburg, R., & deWaal, B. (2008). In search of competencies needed in BPM projects. Communications of the IIMA, 8(2), 23-30.
63. Rosemann, M., & deBruin, T. (2005). Application of the holistic model for determining BP maturity. BP Trends, 1-21.
64. Rosemann, M., deBruin, T., & Power, B. (2006). BPM Maturity. In Jeston, J., & Nelis, J. (Eds.), Business Process Management: Practical guidelines to successful implementation (pp. 299-315). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
65. Schmidt, F. L. (2002). The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there can be no debate. Human Performance, 15(1), 187-210. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1501&02-12 (Pubitemid 36593857)
66. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
67. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 162-173. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1. 162 (Pubitemid 38134908)
68. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Outerbridge, A. N. (1986). Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 432-439. doi:10.1037/0021- 9010.71.3.432
69. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Outerbridge, A. N., & Goff, S. (1988). Joint relation of experience and ability with job performance: Test of three hypotheses. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 46-57. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.46
70. Shanteau, J. (1992a). Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53(2), 252-266. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90064-E
71. Shanteau, J. (1992b). How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? Acta Psychologica, 81(1), 75-86. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(92)90012-3
72. Sivo, S. A., Saunders, C., Quing, C., & Jiang, J. (2006). How low should you go? Response rates and the validity of inference in IS questionnaire research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(6), 351-413.
73. Smart, P. A., Maddern, H., & Maull, R. S. (2009). Understanding business process management: Implications for theory and practice. British Academy of Management, 20(4), 491-507.
74. Smith, H., & Fingar, P. (2002). Business process management (BPM): The third wave. Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.
75. Spanyi, A. (2006). More for less. Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.
76. Spreier, S. W., Fontaine, M. H., & Malloy, R. L. (2006). Leadership run amok: The destructive potential of overachievers. Harvard Business Review, 84(6), 72-82.
77. Taylor, F. W. (1911). Scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
78. Thoresen, C. J., Bradley, J. C., Bliese, P. D., & Thoresen, J. D. (2004). The Big Five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 835-853. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.835 (Pubitemid 39443371)
79. Towers, S., & Schurter, T. (2005). Building on experience: An executive report. Business Process Management Group.
80. Watson, D. L., & Clark, A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core . In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 767-793). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50030-5
81. Watson, H. J., Annino, D. A., Wixom, B. H., Avery, K. L., & Rutherford, M. (2001). Current practices in data warehousing. Information Systems Management, 18(1), 47-55. doi:10.1201/1078/43194.18.1. 20010101/31264.6 (Pubitemid 33394025)
82. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III) (3rd ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.
83. Witt, L. A., Burke, L. A., Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2002). The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 164-169. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1. 164
84. Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 25(1), 17-41. doi:10.2307/3250957 (Pubitemid 33738448)