Changing distance education and changing organizational issues

Economics of Distance and Online Learning: Theory, Practice and Research

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 13-25

  Garrison, D Randy ^a   Kanuka, Heather ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954470493     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203892985     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Calvert, J. (2001). Deakin University: Going online at a dual mode university. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(2). Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/20/360.
2. Cunningham, S., Tapsall, S., Ryan, Y., Stedman, L., Bagdon, K., & Flew, T. (1998). New media and borderless education: A review of the convergence between global media networks and higher education provisions, 97/22. Canberra, AU: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
3. CVCP. (2000). The business of borderless education: UK perspectives. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://bookshop.universitiesuk.ac.uk/downloads/Borderless-Summary.pdf.
4. Davis, A. (2001). Athabasca University: Conversion from traditional distance education to online courses, programs and services. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(2). Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/19/358.
5. Dzuiban, C., Hartman, J., Moskal, P., Sorg, S., & Truman, B. (2004). Three ALN modalities: An institutional perspective. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Into the mainstream, (Vol. 5 in the Sloan C Series). Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
6. Evans, T., & Nation, D. (2003). Globalization and the reinvention of distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 777-792). London: Erlbaum.
7. Garrison, D. R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1), 1-17.
8. Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2004). Critical factors in student satisfaction and success: Facilitating student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Into the mainstream (Vol. 5 in the Sloan C Series, pp. 47-58). Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
9. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
10. Grepperud, G., Støkken, A., & Toska, J. (2002). Out of the shadow and into the spotlight-The development of distance teaching in Norwegian higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(2), 1-13.
11. Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2002). A top down strategy to enhance information technologies into Israeli higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(2), 1-16.
12. Heterick, B., & Twigg, C. (2003, February 1). The learning MarketSpace. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.center.rpi.edu/Newsletters/Feb03.html.
13. Kappell, H-H., Lehmann, B., & Loeper, J. (2002). Distance education at conventional universities in Germany. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(2), 1-21. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/62/127.
14. Keegan, D. (1994). Otto Peters on distance education: The industrialization of teaching and learning. London: Routledge.
15. Lewis, R. (2002). The hybridization of conventional higher education: UK perspective. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(2), 1-13. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/58/120.
16. Litto, F. (2002). The hybridization of distance learning in Brazil-An approach imposed by culture. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(2), 1-14.
17. Mason, R. (2003). Global education: Out of the Ivory Tower. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 743-752). London: Erlbaum.
18. Owston, R., Garrison, D. R., & Cook, K. (in press). Blended learning at Canadian universities: Issues and practices. In C. Bonk & C. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
19. Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332.
20. Shale, D. (2002). The hybridization of higher education in Canada. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(2). Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/64/131.
21. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-331.
22. Zhang, W., Niu, J., & Jiang, G. (2002). Web-based education at conventional universities in China: A case study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(2), 1-14. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/63/129.