The hybridisation of conventional higher education: UK perspective

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 107-118

  Lewis, Roger ^a  

^a Higher Educ Funding Cncl England   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barriers to innovation; Communications and information technology; Distance learning; Learning environment; Open learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042633770     PISSN: 14923831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v2i2.58     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Allison, A. and Tinson, S. (1999). The academic development programme: making higher education accessible for nurses. Open Learning, 14(1), pp. 38-45.
2. Appleton, D. (1996). Implementing open learning in business studies. London: Open Learning Foundation.
3. Barnett, R. (1992). The idea of higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
4. Barnett, R. (1994). Limits of competence. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
5. Bashir, T. (1998). Supporting learning through IT and the Internet. London: Open Learning Foundation.
6. Bell, R. and Tight, M. (1995). Open universities in nineteenth century Britain. Open Learning, 10(2), pp. 3-11.
7. Committee of Scottish University Principals (CSUP), (1992). Teaching and learning in an expanding higher education system (known as "the MacFarlane Report"). Edinburgh: CSUP.
8. Davies, T. Charles (1977). Open learning systems for mature students. (Working Paper 14). London: Council for Educational Technology.
9. Dearnley, C. and Matthew, B. (2000). A group of nurses' experience open learning: exploring the impact. Open Learning, 15(2), pp. 191-206.
10. Edwards, P. (1996). Implementing diagnostic testing for non-specialist mathematics courses. London: Open Learning Foundation.
11. Fitzgerald, M. (1996). No mark for effort skews assessment. London: The Times Higher, April 5 issue, p. 12.
12. Grannell, M., Halton J. and Parker, D. (1996). Self-managed study in mathematics using text and video. London: Open Learning Foundation.
13. Hardy, D. (1991). The Open Polytechnic. Open Learning, 6(2), pp. 55-59.
14. Harrigan, P. and Wade, J. (1995). Extending opportunity in nurse education. London: Open Learning Foundation.
15. Harris, V. and Stoney, C. (1996). An independent learning project in hospitality management. London: Open Learning Foundation.
16. HEFCE (1999). Institutional learning and teaching strategies: A guide to good practice. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE).
17. HEFCE (2001). Strategies for learning and teaching in higher education: A guide to good practice. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE).
18. Hopkins, T. (1996). Using open learning in social work: an implementation handbook. London: Open Learning Foundation.
19. Humphreys, J. and Ham, R. (1994). An application of open learning for the UK physiotherapy profession. Open Learning, 9(3), pp. 3-8.
20. Jones, F. and Rushforth, D. (1996). A consumer survey of an enrolled nurse open learning conversion course. Open Learning, 11(1), pp. 64-68.
21. King, B. (2001). Managing the changing nature of distance and open education at institutional level. Open Learning, 16 (1), pp. 47-60.
22. Lewis, Ray (1984). Clwyd local education authority: A-level sociology distance-learning scheme in schools. In Open Learning in Action R Lewis (Ed.) London: Council for Educational Technology.
23. Lewis, R. (1986). What is open learning? Open Learning, 1(2), pp. 5-10.
24. Lewis, R. (1990). Open learning and the misuse of language: a response to Greville Rumble. Open Learning, 5(1), pp. 3-8.
25. Lewis, R. (1997). Open learning in higher education. Open Learning, 12(3), pp. 3-13.
26. Lisewski, B. (1994). A pilot project at the Liverpool Business School. London: Open Learning Foundation.
27. Nation, D., Paine, N. and Richardson, M. (1990). Open learning and misuse of language: some comments on the Rumble, Lewis debate. Open Learning, 5(2), pp. 40-45.
28. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. (1997). Higher education in the learning society, (known as "the Dearing Report"). London: HMSO.
29. Perry, B. (1995). Flexible learning methods for corporate clients. London: Open Learning Foundation.
30. Perry, M. and Simpson, M. (1996). Resource-based learning in accounting. London: Open Learning Foundation.
31. Quinn, F.M., Phillips, M., Humphreys, J. and Hull, C. (1997). Professional development for nurses: a national open learning partnership. Open Learning, 12(1), Feb 1997, pp. 45-51.
32. Richardson, J. (1996). Changing courses - strategies for changing the HE learning environment. London: Open Learning Foundation.
33. Richardson, J. (1998). Horses for courses? - converting learning materials for electronic delivery. London: Open Learning Foundation.
34. Rumble, G. (1989). "Open learning," "distance learning," and the misuse of language. Open Learning, 4(2), pp. 28-36.
35. Rumble, G. (1992). The competitive vulnerability of distance teaching universities. Open Learning, 7 (2), pp. 31-45.
36. Scott, P. (1995). The meanings of mass higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
37. Stokes, R.J.S. (1994). Computer assisted learning in engineering at the University of Humberside. London: Open Learning Foundation.
38. Thompson, D. (1998). A flexible MBA by Internet. London: Open Learning Foundation.
39. Whitehead, K. (1995). A flexible learning initiative at Coventry University. London: Open Learning Foundation.
40. For further discussion, the following documents available on the Web: Survival of higher education: using new technologies http://www.open.ac.uk/ vcsspeeches/lomalinda.html
41. The traditional university is dead: long live the distributed university http:// www.fae.plym.ac.uk/tele/longlive.html The OU at thirty: strategies for 1999 http://www.vous.org/vc2.html