The reciprocal effects of self-view as a leader and leadership emergence

Small Group Research

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 199-224

  Emery, Cécile ^a   Daniloski, Kim ^b   Hamby, Anne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

leadership emergence; longitudinal network analysis; self concept

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953292459     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: 15528278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496410389494     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Amaral, M., & Monteiro, M. (2002). To be without being seen: Computer-mediated communication and social identity management. Small Group Research, 33, 575-589. doi:10.1177/104649602237171.
2. Amit, K., Popper, M., Gal, R., Mamane-Levy, T., & Lisak, A. (2009). Leadership-shaping experiences: A comparative study of leaders and non-leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30, 302-318. doi:10.1108/ 01437730910961658.
3. Ashford, S.J., Blatt, R., & VandeWell, D. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29, 773-799. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00079-5.
4. Back, M.D., Schmukle, S.C., & Egloff, B. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533-548. doi:10.1037/a0016229.
5. Balkundi, P., Barsness, Z., & Michael, J. (2009). Unlocking the influence of leadership network structures on team conflict and viability. Small Group Research, 40, 301-322. doi:10.1177/1046496409333404.
6. Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2005). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 941-961. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.004.
7. Byrne, B.M. (1996). Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept (pp. 287-316). New York, NY: Wiley.
8. Calder, B.J. (1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 179-204). Chicago, IL: St. Clair.
9. Carson, J.B., Tesluk, P.E., & Marrone, J.A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217-1234. doi:10.2307/20159921.
10. Cooley, C.H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Scribners.
11. Durham, C.C., Knight, D., & Locke, E.A. (1997). Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 203-231. doi:10.1006/obhd. 1997.2739.
12. Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B.J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735-744. doi:10.2307/3069307.
13. Gamble, W.C., & Yu, J.J. (2008). Adolescent siblings' looking glass self-orientations: Patterns of liabilities and associations with parenting. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 860-874. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9276-9.
14. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
15. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0.
16. Grubb, E.L., & Grathwohl, H.L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31, 22-27. doi:10.2307/1249461.
17. Hogg, M.A. (2001a). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1.
18. Hogg, M.A. (2001b). From prototypicality to power: A social identity analysis of leadership. In S. R. Thye, E. J. Lawler, M. W. Macy, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 1-30). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
19. Hogg, M.A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462-479). New York, NY: Guilford.
20. Hogg, M., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35. doi:10.1177/1046496404263424.
21. Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140. doi:10.2307/259266.
22. Hogue, M., & Lord, R.G. (2007). A multilevel, complexity theory approach to understanding gender bias in leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 370-390. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.006.
23. Holland, P.W., & Leinhardt, S. (1971). Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies, 2, 107-124.
24. Hollander, E.P. (1992). Leadership, followership, self, and others. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 43-54. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(92)90005-Z.
25. Huang, M. (2009). A conceptual framework of the effects of positive affective relationships on group knowledge networks. Small Group Research, 40, 323-346. doi:10.1177/1046496409332441.
26. Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764-791. doi:10.2307/ 2667055.
27. Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontier of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16, 359-371. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0129.
28. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
29. Jackson, J. (2008). Reactions to social dilemmas as a function of group identity, rational calculations, and social context. Small Group Research, 39, 673-705. doi:10.1177/1046496408322761.
30. Judge, T.A., Colin, A.E., & Ilies, R. (2004). Intelligence and leadership: A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 542-552. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.542.
31. Karakowsky, L., & Siegel, J.P. (1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 620-631. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.620.
32. Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H., & Contractor, N. (2004). Network theory and small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 307-332. doi:10.1177/1046496404264941.
33. Kellett, J.B., Humphrey, R.H., & Sleeth, R.G. (2002). Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 523-544. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00142-X.
34. Kellett, J.B., Humphrey, R.H., & Sleeth, R.G. (2006). Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 146-162. doi:10.1016/j. leaqua.2005.12.003.
35. Kolb, J. (1999). The effect of gender role, attitude toward leadership, and self-confidence on leader emergence: Implications for leadership development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10, 305-320. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920100403.
36. Lord, R.G., & Brown, D.J. (2004). Leadership processes and follower self-identity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Lord, R.G., Brown, D.J., & Freiberg, S.J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 167-203. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2832.
38. Lord, R.G., de Vader, C.L., & Alliger, G.M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402-410. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.402.
39. Lord, R.G., & Hall, R.J. (2005). Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skill. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 591-615.
40. Lospinoso, J.A., Schweinberger, M., Snijders, T.A.B., & Ripley, R.M. (2010). Assessing and accounting for time heterogeneity in stochastic actor oriented models. Unpublished manuscript.
41. Marsh, H.W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77-171. doi:10.1007/ BF01322177.
42. Marsh, H.W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 59-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Marsh, H.W., Byrne, B.M., & Yeung, A.S. (1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist, 34, 154-157. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_2.
44. Marsh, H.W., Chanal, J.P., Sarrazin, P.G., & Bois, J.E. (2005). Self-belief does make a difference: A reciprocal effects model of the causal ordering of physical self-concept and gymnastics performance. Journal of Sport Sciences, 27, 53-70.
45. Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In G. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131-198). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
46. Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x.
47. Marsh, H.W., Papaioannou, A., & Theodorakis, Y. (2006). Causal ordering of physical self-concept and exercise behavior: Reciprocal effects model and the influence of physical education teachers. Health Psychology, 25, 316-328. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.316.
48. Marsh, H.W., & Perry, C. (2005). Does a positive self-concept contribute to winning gold medals in elite swimming? The causal ordering of elite athlete self-concept and championship performances. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27, 71-91.
49. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.
50. Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D.R., & Sitarenios, G. (2003). Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT. Emotion, 3, 97-105. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.97.
51. Mayer, J.D., Roberts, R.D., & Barsade, S.G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 507-536. doi:10.1146/annurev. psych.59.103006.093646.
52. Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D.J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for the workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 121-146. doi:10.2307/2667127.
53. Mehra, A., Smith, B.R., Dixon, A.L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 232-245. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.003.
54. Meindl, J. (1993). Reinventing leadership: A radical, social psychological approach. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations (pp. 89-118). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55. Midkiff, R.M., Burke, J.P., Hunt, J.P., & Ellison, G.C. (1986). The role of self-concept of academic attainment in achievement-related behaviors. Psychological Reports, 58, 151-159.
56. Neubert, M.J., & Taggar, S. (2004). Pathways to informal leadership: The moderating role of gender on the relationship of individual differences and team member network centrality to informal leadership emergence. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 175-194. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.006.
57. Nicholls, J. (1979). Development of perception of attainment and causal attributions for success and failure in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 94-99. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.94.
58. Ripley, R.M., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2010). Manual for SIENA Version 4.0. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics.
59. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books.
60. Sanders, K., & Nauta, A. (2004). Social cohesiveness and absenteeism: The relationship between characteristics of employees and short-term absenteeism within an organization. Small Group Research, 35, 724-741. doi:10.1177/1046496404267186.
61. Schyns, B., & Sczesny, S. (2010). Leadership attributes valence in self-concept and occupational self-efficacy. Career Development International, 15, 78-92. doi:10.1108/13620431011020907.
62. Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 509-538. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-6494.2010.00625.x.
63. Shaffer, D.R. (2008). Social and personality development. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
64. Shamir, B., House, R.J., & Arthur, M.B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 557-594. doi:10.1287/orsc.4.4.577.
65. Snijders, T.A.B. (2009). Longitudinal methods of network analysis. In B. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and system science (pp. 5998-6013). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
66. Snijders, T.A.B., Steglich, C.E.G., & van de Bunt, G.G. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60. doi:10.1016/ j.socnet.2009.02.004.
67. Snijders, T.A.B., Steglich, C.E.G., & Schweinberger, M. (2007). Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In K. van Montfort, H. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 41-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
68. Sparrowe, R.T. (2005). Authentic leadership and the narrative self. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 419-439. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.004.
69. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537. doi:10.1037/h0037039.
70. Steglich, C.E.G., Snijders, T.A.B., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x/pdf).
71. Taggar, S., Hackett, R., & Saha, S. (1999). Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 52, 899-926. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00184.x.
72. Valacich, J.S., Jung, J.H., & Looney, C.A. (2006). The effects of individual cognitive ability and idea stimulation on idea-generation performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, 1-15. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.1.1.
73. Van den bergh, B.R.H. (2006). Influences of distal and proximal family environment variables on the pre-adolescents' self-concept. In A. P. Prescott (Ed.), The concept of self in education, family and sports (pp. 153-177). New York, NY: Nova Science.
74. Van der Mescht, H. (2004). Phenomenology in education: A case study in educational leadership. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 4, 1-16.
75. Van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M.A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243-295. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1.
76. Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M.A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 825-856. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002.
77. Wheelan, S.A., & Johnston, F. (1996). The role of informal member leaders in a system containing formal leaders. Small Group Research, 27, 33-55. doi:10.1177/1046496496271002.
78. Wiley, S., Perkins, K., & Deaux, K. (2008). Through the looking glass: Ethnic and generational patterns of immigrant identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 385-398. doi:10.1177/1046496496271002.
79. Wolff, S.B., Pescosolido, A.T., & Druskat, V.U. (2002). Emotional intelligence as the basis for leadership emergence in self-managing teams. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 505-522. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00141-8.
80. Yeung, K.T., & Martin, J.L. (2003). The looking glass self: An empirical test and elaboration. Social Forces, 81, 843-879. doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0048.
81. Zaccaro, S.J., Foti, R.J., & Kenny, D.A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.308.