Biodiversity and evolution in the light of morphometrics: From patterns to processes;La biodiversité et l'évolution à la lumière de la morphométrie: des patterns aux processus.

Comptes Rendus - Palevol

Volumn 10, Issue 2-3, 2011, Pages 133-142

  Laffont, Rémi ^a   Firmat, Cyril ^a   Alibert, Paul ^a   David, Bruno ^a   Montuire, Sophie ^a,b   Saucède, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Evolution; Geometric morphometrics; Shape analysis

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GEOMETRY; MORPHOMETRY; PHYLOGENETICS; SHAPE ANALYSIS;

EID: 79953225822     PISSN: 16310683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2010.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Adams D.C. Methods for shape analysis of landmark data from articulated structures. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1999, 1:959-970.
2. Adams D.C., Cerney M.M. Quantifying biomechanical motion using Procrustes motion analysis. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:437-444.
3. Adams D.C., Rohlf F.J., Slice D.E. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the "revolution" Ital. J. Zool. 2004, 71:5-16.
4. Alibert P., Auffray J.-C. Genomic coadaptation, outbreeding depression and developmental instability. Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences 2003, 116-134. Oxford University Press, New York. M. Polak (Ed.).
5. Alibert P., Bollache L., Corberant D., Guesdon V., Cézilly F. Parasitic infection and developmental stability: fluctuating asymmetry in Gammarus pulex infected with two acanthocephalan species. J. Parasitol. 2002, 88:47-54.
6. Arnqvist G., Martensson T. Measurement error in geometric morphometrics: empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 1998, 44:73-96.
7. Baglivo J.A., Graver J.E. Incidence and Symmetry in Design and Architecture 1983, Cambridge University Press, England, 320 p.
8. Berrou V., Merle D., Dommergues J.-L., Crônier C., Néraudeau D. Comparative morphology of Pliocene, Quaternary and Recent shells of Ocenebra erinaceus (Linnaeus, 1758) and O. brevirobusta Houart 2000 (Mollusca, Muricidae, Ocenebrinae): reflections on the intra- and interspecific variations. Geodiversitas 2004, 26:263-295.
9. Bolker J.A. Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo. Am. Zool. 2000, 40:770-776.
10. Bookstein F.L. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 435 p.
11. Bookstein F.L. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 1997, 1:225-243.
12. Canonico G.C., Arthington A., McCrary J.K., Thieme M.L. The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity. Aquat. Conserv. -Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2005, 15:463-483.
13. Cheverud J.M. Morphological integration in the saddle-back Tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) cranium. Am. Nat. 1995, 145:63-89.
14. Cheverud J.M. Developmental integration and the evolution of pleiotropy. Am. Zool. 1996, 36:44-50.
15. Collyer M.L., Novak J.M., Stockwell C.A. Morphological divergence of native and recently established populations of White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa). Copeia 2005, 1:1-11.
16. D'Amato M.E., Esterhuyse M.M., van der Waal B.C.W., Brink D., Volckaert F.A.M. Hybridization and phylogeography of the Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus in southern Africa evidenced by mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA genotyping. Conserv. Genet. 2007, 8:475-488.
17. David B. Mosaic patterns of heterochronies. Evol. Biol. 1990, 24:297-327.
18. Debat V., Alibert P., David P., Paradis E., Auffray J.-C. Independence between developmental stability and canalization in the skull of the house mouse. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2000, 267:423-430.
19. Decker L., Bergea C., Renousa S., Penin X. An alternative approach to normalization and evaluation for gait patterns: Procrustes analysis applied to the cyclograms of sprinters and middle-distance runners. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:2078-2087.
20. Dera G., Eble G.J., Neige P., David B. The flourishing diversity of models in theoretical morphology: from current practices to future macroevolutionary and bioenvironmental challenges. Paleobiology 2008, 34:301-317.
21. Dera G., Neige P., Dommergues J.-L., Fara E., Laffont R., Pellenard P. High-resolution dynamics of Early Jurassic marine extinctions: the case of Pliensbachian-Toarcian ammonites (Cephalopoda). J. Geol. Soc. 2010, 167:21-33.
22. Dommergues J.-L., David B., Marchand D. Les relations ontogenèse-phylogenèse: applications paléontologiques. Geobios 1986, 19:335-356.
23. Dommergues J.-L., Dommergues C.H., Meister C. Exploration of the Oxynoticeratidae ornamental morphospace using the discrete cosine transform (DCT) to analyze rib patterns. Paleobiology 2006, 32:628-651.
24. Drake A.G., Klingenberg C.P. Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. Am. Nat. 2010, 175:63-89.
25. Dryden I.L., Mardia K.V. Statistical Shape Analysis 1998, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 376 p.
26. Fischer A.G. Spatangoids. part U vol. II. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology - Echinodermata-Echinozoa-Echinoidea 1966, 543-628. University of Kansas Press. R.C. Moore (Ed.).
27. Foote M. The evolution of morphological diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1997, 28:129-152.
28. François, E., 2004. La variation morphologique des Toxaster (Echinide irrégulier, Crétacé inférieur). Implications dans la reconstitution des paléoenvironnements et la phylogenèse. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis, Univ. of Bourgogne.
29. Fujimura K., Okada N. Bone development in the jaw of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces: Cichlidae). Dev. Growth Diff. 2008, 50:339-355.
30. Garnier S., Gidaszewski N., Charlot M., Rasplus J.-Y., Alibert P. Hybridization, developmental stability, and functionality of morphological traits in the ground beetle Carabus solieri (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 2006, 89:151-158.
31. Garnier S., Magniez-Jannin F., Rasplus J.-Y., Alibert P. When morphometry meets genetics: inferring the phylogeography of Carabus solieri using Fourier analyses of pronotum and male genitalia. J. Evol. Biol. 2005, 18:269-280.
32. Gerber S., Neige P., Eble G.J. Combining ontogenetic and evolutionary scales of morphological disparity: a study of Early Jurassic ammonites. Evol. Dev. 2007, 9:472-482.
33. Gerber S., Eble G.J., Neige P. Allometric space and allometric disparity: a developmental perspective in the macroevolutionary analysis of morphological disparity. Evolution 2008, 62:1450-1457.
34. Goswami A. Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution. Am. Nat. 2006, 168:270-280.
35. Gotelli N.J., Colwell R.K. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4:379-391.
36. Gunz P., Mitteroecker P., Neubauer S., Weber G.W., Bookstein F.L. Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania. J. Hum. Evol. 2009, 57:48-62.
37. Hallgrímsson G., Willmore K., Dorval C., Cooper D.M.L. Craniofacial variability and modularity in Macaques and Mice. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 2004, 302B:207-225.
38. Kavanagh K.D., Evans A.R., Jernvall J. Predicting evolutionary patterns of mammalian teeth from development. Nature 2007, 449:427-432.
39. Kendall D.G. Shape-manifolds. Procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bull. London Math. Soc. 1984, 16:81-121.
40. Kier P.M. Evolutionary trends and their functional significance in the post-Paleozoic echinoids. J. Paleontol. 1974, 48:1-95.
41. Klingenberg C.P. Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: Tools for evaluating a-priori hypotheses. Evol. Dev. 2009, 11:405-421.
42. Klingenberg C.P. Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:623-635.
43. Klingenberg C.P., McIntyre G.S. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 1998, 52:1363-1375.
44. Klingenberg C.P., Leamy L.J. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 2001, 55:2342-2352.
45. Klingenberg C.P., Leamy L.J., Routman E.J., Cheverud J.M. Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics. Genetics 2001, 157:785-802.
46. Klingenberg C.P., Mebus K., Auffray J.-C. Developmental integration in a complex morphological structure: how distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible?. Evol. Dev. 2003, 5:522-531.
47. Kolbe J.J., Larson A., Losos J.B. Differential admixture shapes morphological variation among invasive populations of the lizard Anolis sagrei. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 8:1579-1591.
48. Laffont R., Renvoisé E., Navarro N., Alibert P., Montuire S. Morphological modularity and assessment of developmental processes within the vole dental row (Microtus arvalis, Arvicolinae. Rodentia). Evol. Dev. 2009, 11:302-311.
49. Lee C.E. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 8:386-391.
50. Lee B.Y., Lee W.J., Streelman J.T., Carleton K.L., Howe A.E., Hulata G., Slettan A., Stern J.E., Terai Y., Kocher T.D. A second-generation genetic linkage map of tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Genetics 2005, 170:237-244.
51. Lefebvre B., Eble G.J., Navarro N., David B. Diversification of atypical Paleozoic echinoderms: a quantitative survey of patterns of stylophoran disparity, diversity, and geography. Paleobiology 2006, 32:483-510.
52. Magniez-Jannin F., David B., Dommergues J.-L. Analysing disparity by applying combined morphological and molecular approaches to French and Japanese carabid beetles. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 2000, 71:343-358.
53. Magwene P.M. New tools for studying integration and modularity. Evolution 2001, 55:1734-1745.
54. Marchand H., Paillat G., Montuire S., Butet A. Fluctuating asymmetry in bank vole populations (Rodentia Arvicolinae) reflects stress caused by landscape fragmentation in the Mont-Saint-Michel Bay. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2003, 80:37-44.
55. Mardia K.V., Bookstein F.L., Moreton I.J. Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes. Biometrika 2000, 87:285-300.
56. Márquez E.J. A statistical framework for testing modularity in multidimensional data. Evolution 2008, 62:2688-2708.
57. Marroig G., Cheverud J.M. A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of New World Monkeys. Evolution 2001, 55:2576-2600.
58. Mitteroecker P., Bookstein F.L. The conceptual and statistical relationship between modularity and morphological integration. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:818-836.
59. Mitteroecker P., Bookstein F.L. The evolutionary role of modularity and integration in the hominoid cranium. Evolution 2008, 62:943-958.
60. Mitteroecker P., Gunz P. Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol. Biol. 2009, 36:235-247.
61. Monteiro L.R., Diniz-Filho J.A.F., dos Reis S.F., Araújo E.D. Geometric estimates of heritability in biological shape. Evolution 2002, 56:563-572.
62. Monteiro L.R., Bonato V., dos Reis S.F. Evolutionary integration and morphological diversification in complex morphological structures: mandible shape divergence in spiny rats (Rodentia Echimyidae). Evol. Dev. 2005, 7:429-439.
63. Mortensen T. Spatangoida. A Monograph of the Echinoidea 1951, 51:1-593. Copenhagen.
64. Moyne S., Neige P. The space-time relationship of taxonomic diversity and morphological disparity in the Middle Jurassic ammonite radiation. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol. 2007, 248:82-95.
65. Neeser R., Ackermann R.R., Gain J. Comparing the accuracy and precision of three techniques used for estimating missing landmarks when reconstructing fossil Hominin Crania. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2009, 140:1-18.
66. Neige P. Spatial patterns of disparity and diversity of the recent cuttlefishes (Cephalopoda) across the Old World. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30:1125-1137.
67. Neige P., Chaline J., Choné T., Courant F., David B., Dommergues J.-L., Laurin B., Madon C., Magniez-Jannin F., Marchand D., Thierry J. La notion d'espace morphologique, outil d'analyse de la morphodiversité des organismes. Geobios 1997, 20:415-422. special issue.
68. Néraudeau D. La variabilité morphologique est-elle un obstacle à la définition des espèces paléontologiques ? Le cas des échinides spatangues. Biosystema 2001, 19:93-107.
69. Nolte A.W., Freyhof J., Stemshorn K.C., Tautz D. An invasive lineage of sculpins, Cottus sp. (Pisces Teleostei) in the Rhine with new habitat adaptations has originated from hybridization between old phylogeographic groups. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2005, 1579:2379-2387.
70. Palmer A.R., Strobeck C. Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1986, 17:391-421.
71. Peres-Neto P.R., Jackson D.A. How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 2001, 129:169-178.
72. Perez S.I., Bernal V., Gonzalez P.N. Differences between sliding semilandmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation. J. Anat. 2006, 208:769-784.
73. Pérez J.E., Nirchio M., Alfonsi C., Munoz C. The biology of invasions: The genetic adaptation paradox. Biol. Invasions 2006, 8:1115-1121.
74. Polly P.D. Development with a bite. Nature 2007, 449:413-415.
75. Raff R.A. Written in stone: fossils, genes and evo-devo. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:911-920.
76. Rasskin-Gutman D. Boundary constraints for the emergence of form. Origination of Organismal Form 2003, 305-322. MIT Press. G.B. Müller, S.A. Newman (Eds.).
77. Rasskin-Gutman D., Buscalioni A.D. Theoretical morphology of the Archosaur (Reptilia: Diapsida) pelvic girdle. Paleobiology 2001, 27:59-79.
78. Renaud S., Alibert P., Auffray J.-C. Mandible shape in hybrid mice. Naturwissenschaften 2009, 96:1043-1050.
79. Renvoisé E., Evans A.R., Jebrane A., Labruère C., Laffont R., Montuire S. Evolution of mammal tooth patterns: new insights from a developmental prediction model. Evolution 2009, 63:1327-1340.
80. Rhymer J.M., Simberloff D. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1996, 27:83-109.
81. Rohlf, F.J., 1990. Fitting curves to outlines. In: Rohlf F.J., Bookstein F.L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop, Spec. Publ. No. 2, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, pp. 167-177.
82. Rohlf F.J. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Class. 1999, 16:197-223.
83. Rohlf F.J., Slice D. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 1990, 39:40-59.
84. Rohlf F.J., Marcus L.F. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1993, 8:129-132.
85. Samadi S., Barberousse A. The tree, the network, and the species. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 2006, 89:509-521.
86. Saucède T., Mooi R., David B. Evolution to the extreme: origins of the highly modified apical system in pourtalesiid echinoids. Zool. J. Linnean Soc. 2004, 140:137-155.
87. Saucède T., Alibert P., Laurin B., David B. Environmental and ontogenetic constraints on developmental stability in the spatangoid sea urchin Echinocardium (Echinoidea). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 2006, 88:165-177.
88. Saucède T., Mooi R., David B. Phylogeny and origin of Jurassic irregular echinoids (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Geol. Mag. 2007, 144:333-359.
89. Schluter D. The ecology of adaptive radiations 2000, Oxford University Press, 288 p.
90. Schwarzer J., Misof B., Tautz D., Schliewen U.K. The root of the East African cichlid radiations. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9:186.
91. Seehausen O. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 4:198-207.
92. Slice D.E. Landmark coordinates aligned by Procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space. Syst. Biol. 2001, 50:141-149.
93. Slice D.E. Geometric morphometrics. Annu. Rev. Anthropol 2007, 36:261-281.
94. Specht M., Lebrun R., Zollikofer C.P.E. Visualizing shape transformation between chimpanzee and human braincases. Visual Comput. 2007, 23:743-751.
95. Stige L.C., David B., Alibert P. On hidden heterogeneity in directional asymmetry - can systematic bias be avoided? J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:492-499.
96. Stockwell C.A., Hendry A.P., Kinnison M.T. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 2:94-101.
97. Strauss R.E., Atanassov M.N. Determining best complete subsets of specimens and characters for multivariate morphometric studies in the presence of large amounts of missing data. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 2006, 88:309-328.
98. Tafforeau P., Boistel R., Boller E., Bravin A., Brunet M., Chaimanee Y., Cloetens P., Feist M., Hoszowska J., Jaeger J.-J., Kay R.F., Lazzari V., Marivaux L., Nel A., Nemoz C., Thibault X., Vignaud P., Zabler S. Applications of X-ray synchrotron microtomography for non-destructive 3D studies of paleontological specimens. Appl. Phys. A 2006, 83:195-202.
99. Tougard C., Brunet-Lecomte P., Fabre M., Montuire S. Evolutionary history of two allopatric Terricola species (Arvicolinae Rodentia) from molecular, morphological, and palaeontological data. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 2008, 93:309-323.
100. von Cramon-Taubadel N., Frazier B.C., Lahr M.M. The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory methods, and modifications. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1997, 124:24-35.
101. Wagner G.P. Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am. Zool. 1996, 36:36-43.
102. Wiley D.F., Amenta N., Alcantara D.A., Ghosh D., Kil Y.J., Delson E., Harcourt-Smith W., Rohlf F.J., St.John K., Hamann B. Evolutionary morphing. Proc. IEEE Visual. 2005, 2005:431-438.
103. Zelditch M.L., Wood A.R., Swiderski D.L. Building developmental integration into functional systems: function-induced integration of mandibular shape. Evol. Biol. 2009, 36:71-87.