A statistical framework for testing modularity in multidimensional data

Evolution

Volumn 62, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2688-2708

  Márquez, Eladio J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental modules; Dimensionality; Geometric morphometrics; Morphological integration; Rodent mandible; Variational modules

Indexed keywords

COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RODENT; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HISTOLOGY; MANDIBLE; PHYLOGENY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RODENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MANDIBLE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYLOGENY; RODENTIA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

RODENTIA;

EID: 53149095447     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00476.x     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Ackermann, R. R., and J. M. Cheverud. 2000. Phenotypic covariance structure in tamarins (genus Saguinus): a comparison of variation patterns using matrix correlation and common principal component analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 111 : 489 501.
2. Albertson, R. C., J. T. Streelman, T. D. Kocher, and P. C. Yelick. 2005. Integration and evolution of the cichlid mandible: the molecular basis of alternate feeding strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 16287 16292.
3. Armbruster, S. W., C. Pélabon, T. F. Hansen, and C. P. H. Mulder. 2004. Floral integration, modularity, and accuracy: distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. Pp. 23 49 in M. Pigliucci and K. Preston, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
4. Atchley, W. R., and B. K. Hall. 1991. A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 66 : 101 157.
5. Bastir, M., and A. Rosas. 2005. Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 128 : 26 34.
6. Beldade, P., K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield. 2002. Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 : 14262 14267.
7. Berg, R. L. 1960. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution 14 : 171 180.
8. Björk, A. 1969. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am. J. Orthodont. 55 : 585 599.
9. Björk, A., and V. Skieller. 1972. Facial development and tooth eruption: an implant study at the age of puberty. Am. J. Orthodont. 62 : 339 383.
10. Bookstein, F. L. 1986. The elements of latent variable models: a cautionary lecture. Pp. 203 229 in M. E. Lamb, A. L. Brown, and B. Rogoff, eds. Advances in developmental psychology, vol. 4. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
12. Bookstein, F. L. 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 1 : 225 243.
13. Bookstein, F. L., A. P. Streissguth, P. D. Sampson, P. D. Connor, and H. M. Barr. 2002. Corpus callosum shape and neuropsychological deficits in adult males with heavy fetal alcohol exposure. Neuroimage 15 : 233 251.
14. Boughner, J. C., and B. Hallgrímsson. 2008. Biological spacetime and the temporal integration of functional modules: a case study of dento-gnathic developmental timing. Dev. Dyn. 237 : 1 17.
15. Breuker, C. J., V. Debat, and C. P. Klingenberg. 2006. Functional evo-devo. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 21 : 488 492.
16. Breuker, C. J., M. Gibbs, H. Van Dyck, P. M. Brakefiled, C. P. Klingenberg, and S. Van Dongen. 2007. Integration of wings and their eyespots in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 308 : 454 463.
17. Carleton, M. D. 1973. A survey of gross stomach morphology in new-world cricetinae rodentia muroidea with comments on functional interpretations. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 146 : 1 43.
18. Cheverud, J. M. 1982. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36 : 499 516.
19. Cheverud, J. M. 2004. Modular pleiotropic effects of quantitative trait loci on morphological traits. Pp. 132 153 in G. Schlosser and G. P. Wagner, eds. Modularity in development and evolution. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
20. Cheverud, J. M., E. J. Routman, and D. J. Irschick. 1997. Pleiotropic effects of individual gene loci on mandibular morphology. Evolution 51 : 2006 2016.
21. Cowley, D. E., and W. R. Atchley. 1992. Quantitative genetic models for development, epigenetic selection, and phenotypic evolution. Evolution 46 : 495 518.
22. Dietz, E. J. 1983. Permutation tests for association between two distance matrices. Syst. Zool. 32 : 21 26.
23. Draghi, J., and G. R. Wagner. 2008. Evolution of evolvability in a developmental model. Evolution 62 : 301 315.
24. Dryden, I. L., and K. V. Mardia. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. Wiley, New York.
25. Ehrich, T. H., T. T. Vaughn, S. Koreishi, R. B. Linsey, L. S. Pletscher, and J. M. Cheverud. 2003. Pleiotropic effects on mandibular morphology I. Developmental morphological integration and differential dominance. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 296 : 58 79.
26. Fornell, C., and F. L. Bookstein. 1982. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Market. Res. 19 : 440 452.
27. Guabloche, A., M. Arana, and O. E. Ramirez. 2002. Diet and gross gastric morphology of Oryzomys xantheolus (Sigmodontinae, Rodentia) in a Peruvian loma. Mammalia 66 : 405 411.
28. Hall, B. K. 2003. Unlocking the black box between genotype and phenotype: cell condensations as morphogenetic (modular) units. Biol. Phil. 18 : 219 247.
29. Hall, B. K., and T. Miyake. 2000. All for one and one for all: condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. Bioessays 22 : 138 147.
30. Hallgrímsson, B., D. E. Lieberman, N. M. Young, T. Parsons, and S. Wat. 2007. Evolution of covariance in the mammalian skull. Novartis Found. Symp. 284 : 164 190.
31. Hansen, T. F. 2006. The evolution of genetic architecture. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37 : 123 157.
32. Herring, S. W. 1993. Epigenetic and functional influences on skull growth. Pp. 153 206 in J. Hanken and B. K. Hall, eds. The Skull, vol. 1: development. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
33. Hershkovitz, P. 1944. A systematic review of the Neotropical water rats of the genus Nectomys (Cricetinae). Misc. Pub. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 58 : 1 107.
34. Hine, E., and M. W. Blows. 2006. Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix. Genetics 173 : 1135 1144.
35. Jöreskog, K. G., and H. Wold. 1982. The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: historical and comparative aspects. Pp. 263 270 in H. Wold and K. Jöreskog, eds. Systems under indirect observation: causality, structure, prediction, vol. I. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
36. Kaufman, M. H., and J. Bard. 1999. The anatomical basis of mouse development. Academic Press, San Diego.
37. Klingenberg, C. P. 1996. Multivariate allometry. Pp. 23 49 in L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds. Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York.
38. Klingenberg, C. P. 2005. Developmental constraints, modules, and evolvability. Pp. 219 247 in B. Hallgrímsson and B. K. Hall, eds. Variation: a central concept in biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
39. Klingenberg, C. P., and S. D. Zaklan. 2000. Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54 : 1273 1285.
40. Klingenberg, C. P., and M. Zimmermann. 1992. Static, ontogenic, and evolutionary allometry: a multivariate comparison in nine species of water-striders. Am. Nat. 140 : 601 620.
41. Klingenberg, C. P., L. J. Leamy, and J. M. Cheverud. 2004. Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166 : 1909 1921.
42. Klingenberg, C. P., K. Mebus, and J. C. Auffray. 2003. Developmental integration in a complex morphological structure: how distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible? Evol. Dev. 5 : 522 531.
43. Krzanowski, W. J. 2000. Principles of multivariate analysis: a user's perspective. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
44. Leamy, L. J., E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud. 1999. Quantitative trait loci for early- and late-developing skull characters in mice: a test of the genetic independence model of morphological integration. Am. Nat. 153 : 201 214.
45. Magwene, P. M. 2001. New tools for studying integration and modularity. Evolution 55 : 1734 1745.
46. Manly, B. F. J. 2006. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
47. Márquez, E. J., and L. L. Knowles. 2007. Correlated evolution of multivariate traits: detecting co-divergence across multiple dimensions. J. Evol. Biol. 20 : 2334 2348.
48. Marroig, G., and J. M. Cheverud. 2001. A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of new world monkeys. Evolution 55 : 2576 2600.
49. Marshall, L. G., S. D. Webb, J. J. Sepkoski, and D. M. Raup. 1982. Mammalian evolution and the great American interchange. Science 215 : 1351 1357.
50. Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle. 2003. Comparing G matrices: are common principal components informative? Genetics 165 : 411 425.
51. Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle. 2005. The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59 : 1027 1038.
52. Mezey, J. G., J. M. Cheverud, and G. P. Wagner. 2000. Is the genotype-phenotype map modular?: a statistical approach using mouse quantitative trait loci data. Genetics 156 : 305 311.
53. Mitteroecker, P., and F. Bookstein. 2007. The conceptual and statistical relationship between modularity and morphological integration. Syst. Biol. 56 : 818 836.
54. Mitteroecker, P., and F. Bookstein. 2008. The evolutionary role of modularity and integration in the hominoid cranium. Evolution 62 : 943 958.
55. Monteiro, L. R., V. Bonato, and S. F. dos Reis. 2005. Evolutionary integration and morphological diversification in complex morphological structures: mandible shape divergence in spiny rats (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Evol. Dev. 7 : 429 439.
56. Olson, E. C., and R. L. Miller. 1958. Morphological integration. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
57. Orr, H. A. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54 : 13 20.
58. Pavlicev, M., J. P. Kenney-Hunt, E. A. Norgard, C. C. Roseman, J. B. Wolf, and J. M. Cheverud. 2008. Genetic variation in pleiotropy: differential epistasis as a source of variation in the allometric relationship between long bone lengths and body weight. Evolution 62 : 199 213.
59. Peres-Neto, P. R., and D. A. Jackson. 2001. How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 129 : 169 178.
60. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53 : 1506 1515.
61. Raff, R. 1996. The shape of life: genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
62. Riedl, R. 1977. Systems-analytical approach to macro-evolutionary phenomena. Q. Rev. Biol. 52 : 351 370.
63. Richtsmeier, J. T., S. R. Lele, and T. M. Cole, III. 2005. Landmark morphometrics and the analysis of variation. Pp. 49 69 in B. Hallgrímsson and B. K. Hall, eds. Variation: a central concept in biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
64. Rinker, G. C. 1954. The comparative myology of the mammalian genera Sigmodon, Oryzomys, Neotoma, and Peromyscus (Cricetinae), with remarks on their intergeneric relationships. Misc. Pub. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 83 : 1 165.
65. Riska, B. 1986. Some models for development, growth, and morphometric correlation. Evolution 40 : 1303 1311.
66. Rohlf, F. J. 2006. TpsDig2 software, ver. 2.10. State Univ. New York, Stony Brook.
67. Rohlf, F. J., and D. Slice. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Biol. 39 : 40 59.
68. Rohlf, F. J., and M. Corti. 2000. Use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. Syst. Biol. 49 : 740 753.
69. Sheets, H. D. 2002a. Semiland6 software. Canisius College, Buffalo, NY.
70. Sheets, H. D. 2002b. Standard6 software. Canisius College, Buffalo, NY.
71. Smith, K. K. 1993. The form of the feeding apparatus in terrestrial vertebrates: studies of adaptation and constraint. Pp. 150 196 in J. Hanken and B. K. Hall, eds. The Skull, vol. 3: functional and evolutionary mechanisms. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
72. Steppan, S. J. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of phenotypic covariance structure I. Contrasting results from matrix correlation and Common Principal Component Analyses. Evolution 51 : 571 586.
73. Steppan, S. J., P. C. Phillips, and D. Houle. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 : 320 327.
74. The MathWorks, Inc. 2006. Matlab R2006a software. Natick, MA.
75. Tokita, M., T. Kiyoshi, and K. N. Armstrong. 2007. Evolution of craniofacial novelty in parrots through developmental modularity and heterochrony. Evol. Dev. 9 : 590 601.
76. Voss, R. S. 1988. Systematics and ecology of Ichthyomyine rodents (Muroidea): patterns of morphological evolution in a small adaptive radiation. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 188 : 259 493.
77. Wagner, G. P. 1984. On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices: evidence for a nonrandom organization of quantitative character variation. J. Math. Biol. 21 : 77 95.
78. Wagner, G. P. 1988. The influence of variation and of developmental constraints on the rate of multivariate phenotypic evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 1 : 45 66.
79. Wagner, G. P., and L. Altenberg. 1996. Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50 : 967 976.
80. Wagner, G. P., and J. G. Mezey. 2004. The role of genetic architecture constraints in the origin of variational modularity. Pp. 338 358 in G. Schlosser and G. P. Wagner, eds. Modularity in development and evolution. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
81. Wagner, G. P., M. Pavlicev, and J. M. Cheverud. 2007. The road to modularity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8 : 921 931.
82. Walker, J. A. 2000. Ability of geometric morphometric methods to estimate a known covariance matrix. Syst. Biol. 49 : 686 696.
83. Weksler, M. 2003. Phylogeny of Neotropical oryzomyine rodents (Muridae: Sigmodontinae) based on the nuclear IRBP exon. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 29 : 331 349.
84. Weksler, M. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of oryzomine rodents (Muroidea: Sigmodontinae): separate and combined analyses of morphological and molecular data. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 296 : 1 149.
85. Wold, H. 1966. Nonlinear estimation by iterative least square procedures. Pp. 411 444 in F. N. David, ed. Research papers in statistics. Wiley, New York.
86. Wright, S. 1932. General, group and special size factors. Genetics 17 : 0603 0619.
87. Young, R. L., and A. V. Badyaev. 2006. Evolutionary persistence of phenotypic integration: influence of developmental and functional relationships on complex trait evolution. Evolution 60 : 1291 1299.
88. Zelditch, M. L., and A. C. Carmichael. 1989. Ontogenetic variation in patterns of developmental and functional integration in skulls of Sigmodon fulviventer. Evolution 43 : 814 824.
89. Zelditch, M. L., J. Mezey, H. D. Sheets, B. L. Lundrigan, and T. Garland. 2006. Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance. Evol. Dev. 8 : 46 60.
90. Zelditch, M. L., D. O. Straney, D. L. Swiderski, and A. C. Carmichael. 1990. Variation in developmental constraints in Sigmodon. Evolution 44 : 1738 1747.