Combining ontogenetic and evolutionary scales of morphological disparity: A study of early Jurassic ammonites

Evolution and Development

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 472-482

  Gerber, Sylvain ^a   Neige, Pascal ^a   Eble, Gunther J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMMONITE; BIODIVERSITY; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HETEROCHRONY (ONTOGENY); JURASSIC; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; PALEOBIOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; TRAJECTORY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; CEPHALOPOD; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; CEPHALOPODA; EVOLUTION; LINEAR MODELS; PHYLOGENY;

AMMONOIDEA; CEPHALOPODA; HILDOCERATIDAE; MOLLUSCA;

EID: 34548524471     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: 1525142X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00185.x     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Alberch, P. 1982. Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes. In J. T. Bonner (ed.). Evolution and Development. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 313 332.
2. Alberch, P., Gould, S. J., Oster, G. F. Wake, D. B. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5 : 296 317.
3. Arthur, W. 2002. The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental Biology. Nature 415 : 757 764.
4. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, New York.
5. Bucher, H., Landman, N. H., Klofak, S. M. Guex, J. 1996. Mode and rate of growth in ammonoids. In N. H. Landman, K. Tanabe R. A. Davis (eds.). Ammonoid Paleobiology. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 407 461.
6. Ciampaglio, C. N. 2002. Determining the role that ecological and developmental constraints play in controlling disparity: examples from the crinoid and blastozoan fossil record. Evol. Dev. 4 : 170 188.
7. Ciampaglio, C. N., Kemp, M. McShea, D. W. 2001. Detecting changes in morphospace occupation patterns in the fossil record: characterization and analysis of measures of disparity. Paleobiology 27 : 695 715.
8. Cock, A. G. 1966. Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 41 : 131 190.
9. Davis, R. A., Landman, N. H., Dommergues, J. L., Marchand, D. Bucher, H. 1996. Mature modifications and dimorphism in ammonoid cephalopods. In N. H. Landman, K. Tanabe R. A. Davis (eds.). Ammonoid Paleobiology. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 463 539.
10. Dean, W. T., Donovan, D. T. Howarth, M. K. 1961. The Liassic ammonite zones and subzones of the North-West European province. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Geol. 4 : 435 505.
11. Dommergues, J.-L., David, B. Marchand, D. 1986. Les relations ontogenèse-phylogenèse: applications paléontologiques. Geobios 19 : 335 356.
12. Dommergues, J.-L., Dommergues, C.-H. Meister, C. 2006. Exploration of the Oxynoticeratidae ornamental morphospace using the discrete cosine transform (DCT) to analyze rib patterns. Paleobiology 32 : 628 651.
13. Dommergues, J.-L. Meister, C. 1989. Trajectoire ontogéné tiques et hétérochronies complexes chez des ammonites (Harpoceratinae) du Jurassique inférieur (Domérien). Geobios 12 (Mém. spec.) : 157 166.
14. Dommergues, J.-L., Montuire, S. Neige, P. 2002. Size patterns through time: the case of the Early Jurassic ammonite radiation. Paleobiology 28 : 423 434.
15. Donovan, D. T., Callomon, J. H. Howarth, M. K. 1981. Classification of the Jurassic Ammonitina. In M. R. House J. R. Senior (eds.). The Ammonoidea. The Evolution, Classification, Mode of Life and Geological Usefulness of a Major Fossil Group. Academic Press, London, pp. 101 155.
16. Dryden, I. L. Mardia, K. V. 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
17. Eble, G. J. 1998. The role of development in evolutionary radiations. In M. L. McKinney J. A. Drake (eds.). Biodiversity Dynamics: Turnover of Populations, Taxa and Communities. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 132 161.
18. Eble, G. J. 2000. Contrasting evolutionary flexibility in sister groups: disparity and diversity in Mesozoic atelostomate echinoids. Paleobiology 26 : 56 79.
19. Eble, G. J. 2002. Multivariate approaches to development and evolution. In N. Minus-Purvis K. J. McNamara (eds.). Human Evolution through Developmental Change. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 51 78.
20. Eble, G. J. 2003. Developmental morphospaces and evolution. In J. P. Crutchfield P. Schuster (eds.). Evolutionary Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 35 65.
21. Elmi, S., Rulleau, L., Gabilly, J. Mouterde, R. 1997. Toarcien. In E. Cariou P. Hantzpergue (eds.). Biostratigraphie du Jurassique Ouest-Européen et Méditerranéen : Zonations Parallèles et Distribution des Invertébrés et Microfossiles. Bull. Centre Rech. Elf Explor. Prod., Mém. 17, Pau, pp. 25 36.
22. Fink, W. L. 1982. The conceptual relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 8 : 254 264.
23. Fink, W. L. 1988. Phylogenetic analysis and the detection of ontogenetic patterns. In M. L. McKinney (ed.). Heterochrony in Evolution: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 71 91.
24. Foote, M. 1991. Analysis of morphological data. In N. L. Gilinsky P. W. Signor (eds.). Analytical Paleobiology. The Paleontological Society, Knoxville, pp. 59 86.
25. Foote, M. 1992. Rarefaction analysis of morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 18 : 1 16.
26. Foote, M. 1993a. Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 19 : 185 204.
27. Foote, M. 1993b. Contributions of individual taxa to overall morphological disparity. Paleobiology 19 : 403 419.
28. Foote, M. 1996. Models of morphological diversification. In D. Jablonski, D. H. Erwin J. H. Lipps (eds.). Evolutionary Paleobiology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 62 86.
29. Foote, M. 1997. The evolution of morphological diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 : 129 152.
30. Gabilly, J. 1976. Le Toarcien à Thouars et dans le centre-ouest de la France. Editions du CNRS, Paris.
31. Garcia, L. V. 2004. Escaping the Bonferroni iron claw in ecological studies. Oikos 105 : 657 663.
32. Godfrey, L. R. Sutherland, M. R. 1995. Flawed inference: why sizebased tests of heterochronic processes do not work. J. Theor. Biol. 172 : 43 61.
33. Gould, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41 : 587 640.
34. Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
35. Gould, S. J. 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. Norton, New York.
36. Gould, S. J. 1991. The disparity of the Burgess Shale arthropod fauna and the limits of cladistic analysis: why we must strive to quantify morphospace. Paleobiology 17 : 411 423.
37. Gould, S. J. 1992. Heterochrony. In E. F. Keller E. A. Lloyd (eds.). Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 158 165.
38. Gould, S. J. 2000. Of coiled oysters and big brains: how to rescue the terminology of heterochrony, now gone astray. Evol. Dev. 2 : 241 248.
39. Hall, B. K. 1999. Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
40. Hall, B. K. 2003. Evo-Devo: evolutionary developmental mechanisms. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47 : 491 495.
41. Hochberg, Y. Benjamini, Y. 1990. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat. Med. 9 : 811 818.
42. Howarth, M. K. 1992. The Ammonite Family Hildoceratidae in the Lower Jurassic of Britain. The Palaeontographical Society, London.
43. Ihaka, R. Gentleman, R. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5 : 299 314).
44. Jones, D. S. Gould, S. J. 1999. Direct measurement of age in fossil Gryphaea: the solution to a classical problem in heterochrony. Paleobiology 25 : 158 187.
45. Klingenberg, C. P. 1998. Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol. Rev. 73 : 79 123.
46. Kullmann, J. Scheuch, J. 1972. Absolutes und relatives Wachstum bei Ammonoideen. Lethaia 5 : 129 146.
47. Landman, N. H. 1987. Ontogeny of upper cretaceous (Turonian-Santonian) scaphitid ammonites from the western interior of North America: systematics, developmental patterns, and life history. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 185 : 117 241.
48. Landman, N. H. 1988. Early ontogeny of Mesozoic ammonites and nautilids. In J. Weidmann J. Kullmann (eds.). Cephalopods - Present and Past. Sweitzerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, pp. 215 228.
49. Maderson, P. F. A., et al. 1982. The role of development in macroevolutionary change. In J. T. Bonner (ed.). Evolution and Development. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 279 312.
50. Marcus, L. F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G. J. P. Slice, D. E. 1996. Advances in Morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York.
51. Maynard-Smith, J., Burian, R., Kauffman, S., Alberch, P., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., Lande, R., Raup, D. Wolpert, L. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 60 : 265 287.
52. McClain, C. R., Johnson, N. A. Rex, M. A. 2004. Morphological disparity as a biodiversity metric in lower bathyal and abyssal gastropod assemblages. Evolution 58 : 338 348.
53. McKinney, M. L. 1999. Heterochrony: beyond words. Paleobiology 25 : 149 153.
54. McKinney, M. L. McNamara, K. J. 1991. Heterochrony: The Evolution of Ontogeny. Plenum Press, New York.
55. McNamara, K. J. 2002. Changing times: changing places: heterochrony and heterotopy. Paleobiology 31 (suppl.) : 17 26.
56. McNamara, K. J. McKinney, M. L. 2005. Heterochrony, disparity, and macroevolution. Paleobiology 31 (suppl.) : 17 26.
57. Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P. Bookstein, F. L. 2005. Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: a comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodites. Evol. Dev. 7 : 244 258.
58. Moyne, S. Neige, P. 2007. The space-time relationship of taxonomic diversity and morphological disparity in the Middle Jurassic ammonite radiation. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 248 : 82 95.
59. Navarro, N., Neige, P. Marchand, D. 2005. Faunal invasions as a source of morphological constraints and innovations? The diversification of the early Cardioceratidae (Ammonoidea; Middle Jurassic). Paleobiology 31 : 98 116.
60. Neige, P. 1997. Ontogeny of the Oxfordian ammonite Creniceras renggeri from the Jura of France. Eclogae Geol. Helv. 90 : 605 616.
61. Neige, P. 2003. Spatial patterns of disparity and diversity of the recent cuttlefishes (Cephalopoda) across the Old World. J. Biogeogr. 30 : 1125 1137.
62. Neige, P., Elmi, S. Rulleau, L. 2001. Existe-t'il une crise au passage Lias-Dogger chez les ammonites? Approche morphométrique par quantification de la disparité morphologique. Bull. Soc. Géol. France 172 : 257 264.
63. Neige, P., Marchand, D. Laurin, B. 1997. Heterochronic differentiation of sexual dimorphs among Jurassic ammonite species. Lethaia 30 : 145 155.
64. Raff, R. 1996. The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
65. Raff, R. A. Wray, G. A. 1989. Heterochrony: developmental processes and evolutionary results. J. Evol. Biol. 2 : 409 434.
66. Raup, D. M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems. J. Paleontol. 40 : 1178 1190.
67. Raup, D. M. 1967. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: coiling in ammonoids. J. Paleontol. 41 : 43 65.
68. Reyment, R. A. Kennedy, W. J. 1998. Taxonomic recognition of species of Neogastroplites (Ammonoidea, Cenomanian) by geometric morphometric methods. Cretaceous Res. 19 : 25 42.
69. Rice, S. H. 1997. The analysis of ontogenetic trajectories: when a change in size or shape is not heterochrony. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 : 907 912.
70. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43 : 223 225.
71. Rohlf, F. J. 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Classif. 16 : 197 223.
72. Rohlf, F. J. 2000. On the use of shape spaces to compare morphometric methods. Hystrix (n.s.) 11 : 9 25.
73. Rohlf, F. J. Slice, D. E. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39 : 40 59.
74. Roy, K., Balch, D. P. Hellberg, M. E. 2001. Spatial patterns of morphological diversity across the Indo-Pacific: analyses using strombid gastropods. Proc. R. Soc. London B 268 : 1 6.
75. Roy, K. Foote, M. 1997. Morphological approaches to measuring biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12 : 277 281.
76. Saunders, W. B. Swan, A. R. H. 1984. Morphology and morphologic diversity of mid-Carboniferous ammonoids. Paleobiology 10 : 195 228.
77. Saunders, W. B., Work, D. M. Nokolaeva, S. V. 2004. The evolutionary history of shell geometry in Paleozoic ammonoids. Paleobiology 30 : 19 43.
78. Shea, B. T. 1983. Allometry and heterochrony in the African apes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 62 : 275 289.
79. Slice, D. E. 2001. Landmark coordinates aligned by procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space. Syst. Biol. 50 : 141 149.
80. Small, C. G. 1996. The Statistical Theory of Shape. Springer, New York.
81. Wagner, P. J. 1995. Testing evolutionary constraint hypotheses with Early Paleozoic gastropods. Paleobiology 21 : 248 272.
82. Ward, P. D. 1980. Comparative shell shape distributions in Jurassic-Cretaceous ammonites and Jurassic-Tertiary nautilids. Paleobiology 6 : 32 43.
83. Webster, M. Zelditch, M. L. 2005. Evolutionary modifications of ontogeny: heterochrony and beyond. Paleobiology 31 : 354 372.
84. Wills, M. A., Briggs, D. E. G. Fortey, R. A. 1994. Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and recent arthropods. Paleobiology 20 : 93 130.
85. Zelditch, M. L. Fink, W. L. 1996. Heterochrony and heterotopy: stability and innovation in the evolution of form. Paleobiology 22 : 241 254.
86. Zelditch, M. L., Sheets, H. D. Fink, W. L. 2003. The ontogenetic dynamics of shape disparity. Paleobiology 29 : 139 156.
87. Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., Sheets, H. D. Fink, W. L. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, New York.