Evolutionary integration and morphological diversification in complex morphological structures: Mandible shape divergence in spiny rats (Rodentia, Echimyidae)

Evolution and Development

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 429-439

  Monteiro, Leandro R ^a   Bonato, Vinícius ^b   Dos Reis, Sérgio F ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE FLUMINENSE DARCY RIBEIRO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MORPHOLOGY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HISTOLOGY; MANDIBLE; PHYLOGENY; RAT;

ANIMALS; MANDIBLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; RATS;

ECHIMYIDAE; RODENTIA;

EID: 28444461489     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2005.05047.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Atchley, W. R. 1993. Genetic and developmental aspects of variability in the mammalian mandible. In J. Hanken and B. K. Hall (eds.). The Skull. Vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 207-247.
2. Atchley, W. R., Cowley, D. E., Vogl, C., and McLellan, T. 1992. Evolutionary divergence, shape change and genetic correlation structure in the rodent mandible. Systems Biol. 41: 196-221.
3. Atchley, W. R., and Hall, B. K. 1991. A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biol. Rev. 66: 101-157.
4. Badyaev, A. V., and Foresman, K. R. 2004. Evolution of morphological integration. I. Functional units channel stress-induced variation in shrew mandibles. Am. Nat. 163: 868-879.
5. Björklund, M., and Merilä, J. 1993. Morphological differentiation in Carduelis finches: adaptive vs. constraint models. J. Evol. Biol. 6: 359-373.
6. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, New York.
7. Bookstein, F. L., Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., Prossinger, H., Schaefer, K., and Seidler, H. 2003. Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution. J. Hum. Evol. 44: 167-187.
8. Cardini, A. 2003. The geometry of marmot (Rodentia: Sciuridae) mandible: phylogeny and patterns of morphological evolution. Systems Biol. 52: 186-205.
9. Chai, Y., et al. 2000. Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. Development 127: 1671-1679.
10. Chernoff, B., and Magwene, P. M. 1999. Morphological integration: forty years later. In E. C. Olson and R. C. Miller (eds.). Morphological Integration. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 319-353.
11. Cheverud, J. M. 1996. Developmental integration and the evolution of pleiotropy. Am. Zool. 36: 44-50.
12. Cheverud, J. M., Routman, E. J., and Irschick, D. J. 1997. Pleiotropic effects of individual gene loci on mandibular morphology. Evolution 51: 2006-2016.
13. Cheverud, J. M., Rutledge, J., and Atchley, W. 1983. Quantitative genetics of development: genetic correlations among age-specific trait values and the evolution of ontogeny. Evolution 37: 895-905.
14. Duarte, L. C., Monteiro, L. R., Von Zuben, F. J., and Reis, S. F. 2000. Variation in mandible shape in Thrichomys apereoides (Mammalia: Rodentia): geometric analysis of a complex morphological structure. Systems Biol. 49: 563-578.
15. Eble, G. J. 2004. The macroevolution of phenotypic integration. In M. Pigliucci and K. A. Preston (eds.). Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 253-273.
16. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systems 19: 445-471.
17. Galewski, T., Mauffrey, J. F., Leite, Y. L. R., Patton, J. L., and Douzery, E. J. P. 2005. Ecomorphological diversification among South American spiny rats (Rodentia: Echimyidae): a phylogenetic and chronological approach. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34: 601-615.
18. Hall, B. K. 2003. Unlocking the black box between genotype and phenotype: cell condensations as morphogenetic (modular units). Biol. Philos. 18: 219-247.
19. Klingenberg, C. P., Badyaev, A. V., Sowry, S. M., and Beckwith, N. J. 2001a. Inferring developmental modularity from morphological integration: analysis of individual variation and asymmetry in bumblebee wings. Am. Nat. 157: 11-23.
20. Klingenberg, C. P., and Leamy, L. J. 2001. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 55: 2342-2352.
21. Klingenberg, C. P., Leamy, L. J., and Cheverud, J. M. 2004. Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166: 1909-1921.
22. Klingenberg, C. P., Leamy, L. J., Routman, E. J., and Cheverud, J. M. 2001b. Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics. Genetics 157: 785-802.
23. Klingenberg, C. P., Mebus, K., and Auffray, J. C. 2003. Developmental integration in a complete morphological structure: how distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible? Evol. Dev. 5: 522-531.
24. Klingenberg, C. P., and Zaklan, S. D. 2000. Morphological integration between developmental compartmens in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54: 1273-1285.
25. Lande, R., and Arnold, S. J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
26. Lara, M. C., and Patton, J. L. 2000. Evolutionary diversification of spiny rats (genus Trinomys, Rodentia: Echimyidae) in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 130: 661-686.
27. Leamy, L. J., Routman, E. J., and Cheverud, J. M. 1999. Quantitative trait loci for early- and late developing skull characters in mice: a test of the genetic independence model of morphological integration. Am. Nat. 153: 201-214.
28. Legendre, P. 2002. Program for Multiple Linear Regression (Ordinary or Through the Origin) with Permutation Test - User's Notes. Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montreal.
29. Leite, Y. L. R., and Patton, J. L. 2002. Evolution of south american spiny rats (Rodentia, Echimyidae): the star phylogeny hypothesis revisited. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 25: 455-464.
30. Mavropoulos, A., Bresin, A., and Kiliaridis, S. 2004. Morphometric analysis of the mandible in growing rats with different masticatory functional demands: adaptation to an upper posterior bite block. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 112: 259-266.
31. Mezey, J. G., Cheverud, J. M., and Wagner, G. P. 2000. Is the genotype-phenotype map modular? A statistical approach using mouse quantitative trait loci data. Genetics 156: 305-311.
32. Monteiro, L. R. 1999. Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Systems Biol. 48: 192-199.
33. Monteiro, L. R., and Abe, A. S. 1999. Functional and historical determinants of shape in the scapula of xenarthran mammals: evolution of a complex morphological structure. J. Morph. 241: 251-263.
34. Monteiro, L. R., Duarte, L. C., and Reis, S. F. 2003. Environmental correlates of geographical variation in skull and mandible shape of the Punaré rat (Thrichomys apereoides). J. Zool. (London) 261: 47-57.
35. Murray, J. D. 2000. Pattern formation in integrative biology - a marriage of theory and experiment. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la Vie 323: 5-14.
36. Nicola, P. A., Monteiro, L. R., Pessôa, L. M., Von Zuben, F. J., Rohlf, F. J., and Reis, S. F. 2003. Congruence of hierarchical, localized variation in cranial shape and molecular phylogenetic structure in spiny rats, genus Trinomys (Rodentia: Echimyidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 385-396.
37. Oster, G. O., Shubin, N., Murray, J. D., and Alberch, P. 1988. Evolution and morphogenetic rules: the shape of the vertebrate limb in ontogeny and phylogeny. Evolution 42: 862-884.
38. Pigliucci, M. 2003. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Ecol. Lett. 6: 265-272.
39. Ramaesh, T., and Bard, J. B. L. 2003. The growth and morphogenesis of the early mouse mandible: a quantitative analysis. J. Anat. 203: 213-222.
40. Reis, S. F., Duarte, L. C., Monteiro, L. R., and Von Zuben, F. J. 2002. Geographic variation in cranial morphology in Thrichomys apereoides (Rodentia: Echimyidae). I. Geometric descriptors and patterns of variation in shape. J. Mamm. 83: 333-344.
41. Renaud, S., and Michaux, J. R. 2003. Adaptive latitudinal trends in the mandible shape of Apodemus wood mice. J. Biogeogr. 30: 1617-1628.
42. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.r-project.org.
43. Rohlf, F. J. 1998. On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Systems Biol. 47: 147-158.
44. Rohlf, F. J. 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Classif. 16: 197-223.
45. Rohlf, F. J. 2000. NTSYS-PC, Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.1. Applied Biostatistics Inc., Setauket.
46. Rohlf, F. J. 2003. TPSSmall Version 1.2. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook.
47. Rohlf, F. J., and Corti, M. 2000. The use of two-block partial least squares to study covariation in shape. Systems Biol. 49: 740-753.
48. Rohlf, F. J., and Slice, D. E. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systems Zool. 39: 40-59.
49. Russel, A. P., and Thomason, J. J. 1993. Mechanical analysis of the mammalian head skeleton. In J. Hanken and B. K. Hall (eds.). The Skull. Vol. 3. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 345-383.
50. Sánchez, J. A., and Lasker, H. R. 2003. Patterns of morphological integration in marine modular organisms: supra-module organization in branching octocoral colonies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 2039-2044.
51. Streissguth, A. P., Sampson, P., and Barr, H. 1993. The Enduring Effects of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Child Development. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
52. Wagner, G. P. 1996. Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am. Zool. 36: 36-43.
53. Wagner, G. P., and Altenberg, L. 1996. Perspective: complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50: 967-976.
54. Wake, M. H. 1993. The skull as a locomotor organ. In J. Hanken and B. K. Hall (eds.). The Skull. Vol. 3. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 197-240.
55. Weishampel, D. A. 1993. Beams and machines: modeling approaches to the analysis of skull form and function. In J. Hanken and B. K. Hall (eds.). The Skull. Vol. 3. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 303-344.
56. Workman, M. S., Leamy, L. J., Routman, E. J., and Cheverud, J. M. 2002. Analysis of quantitative trait locus effects on the size and shape of mandibular molars in mice. Genetics 160: 1573-1596.
57. Zelditch, M. L. 1987. Evaluating models of developmental integration in the laboratory rat using confirmatory factor analysis. Systems Zool. 36: 368-380.
58. Zeng, Z. B. 1988. Long-term correlated response, interpopulation covariation and interspecific allometry. Evolution 42: 363-374.