Cardiac output monitoring: Aortic transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis agree with standard thermodilution methods in patients undergoing lung transplantation

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 707-711

  Della Rocca, Giorgio ^a,d   Costa, Maria Gabriella ^a   Coccia, Cecilia ^a   Pompei, Livia ^a   Di Marco, Pierangelo ^b   Vilardi, Vincenzo ^c   Pietropaoli, Paolo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^d NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA; ARTERY CATHETER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVICE; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THERMODILUTION; TIME;

EID: 0142149221     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf03018714     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L, Coccia C, Pietropaoli P. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 350-6.
2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
3. Gödje O, Thiel C, Lamm P, et al. Less invasive, continuous hemodynamic monitoring during minimally invasive coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1532-6.
4. Rödig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 525-30.
5. Gödje O, Höeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Faltchauser A, Lamm P, Reichart B. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2407-12.
6. Burhe W, Weyland A, Kazmaier S, et al. Comparison of cardiac output by pulse-contour analysis and thermodilution in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13: 437-40.
7. Böttiger BW. Continuous cardiac output monitoring-further applications of the thermodilution principle. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 131-3.
8. Schmid ER, Schmidlin D, Tornic M, Seifert B. Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: clinical validation against a reference technique of known accuracy. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 166-72.
9. Aranda M, Mihm FG, Garrett S, Mihm MN, Pearl RG. Continuous cardiac output catheters. Delay in in vitro response time after controlled flow changes. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1592-5.
10. Lefrant JY, Bruelle P, Ripart J, et al. Cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients: comparison of continuous and conventional thermodilution techniques. Report of investigation. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42: 972-6.