Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers' understandings of the nature of science

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 414-436

  Bell, Randy L ^a   Matkins, Juanita Jo ^b   Gansneder, Bruce M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

nature of science (NOS); science education; science literacy; science teacher education; socioscientific issues

Indexed keywords

NATURE OF SCIENCE; SCIENCE EDUCATION; SCIENCE LITERACY; SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION; SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES;

GLOBAL WARMING;

TEACHING;

EID: 79952756566     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20402     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F.S., (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 215-233.
2. Abd-El-Khalick, F.S., &, Akerson, V.L., (2004). Learning about Nature of Science as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science. Science Education, 88, 785-810. (Pubitemid 39288875)
3. Abd-El-Khalick, F.S., Bell, R.L., &, Lederman, N.G., (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
4. Abd-El-Khalick, F.S., &, Lederman, N.G., (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (7), 665-701.
5. Abell, S.K., &, Smith, D.C., (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16 (4), 475-487.
6. Akerson, V.L., &, Abd-El-Khalick, F.S., (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A year long case study of a fourth grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1025-1049.
7. Akerson, V.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., &, Lederman, N.G., (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295-317.
8. Akerson, V.L., Morrison, J.A., &, McDuffie, A.R., (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 43, 194-213.
9. Akerson, V.L., &, Hanuscin, D.L., (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 44, 653-680. (Pubitemid 46798007)
10. Akindehin, F., (1988). Effect of an instructional package on preservice science teachers' understanding of the nature of science and acquisition of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 72, 73-82.
11. Alters, B.J., (1997). Whose Nature of Science ? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39-55.
12. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Bell, R.L., (2008). Teaching the nature of science through process skills: Activities for grades 3-8. New York: Allyn & Bacon/Longman.
14. Bell, R., Blair, L., Crawford, B., &, Lederman, N.G., (2003). Just do it? The impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487-509.
15. Bell, R.L., Lederman, N.G., &, Abd-El-Khalick, F.S., (2000). Developing and acting upon one's conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563-581.
16. Bell, R.L., &, Lederman, N.G., (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377.
17. Bell, R.L., Toti, D., McNall, R.L., &, Tai, R.L., (2004, January). Beliefs into action: Beginning teachers' implementation of nature of science instruction. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Nashville, TN.
18. Bentley, M.L., &, Fleury, S.C., (1998). Of starting points and destinations: Teacher education and the nature of science. In:, W.F. Mccomas, (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 277-291). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Bogdan, R.C., &, Biklen, S.K., (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
20. Brickhouse, N.W., (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (3), 53-62.
21. Brickhouse, N.W., Dahger, Z.R., Letts, W.J., &, Shipman, H.L., (2000). Diversity of students' views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 340-362.
22. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., &, Duguid, P., (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 17, 32-42.
23. Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., &, Unger, C., (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: A study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514-529.
24. Christy, J.R., (2007). Global warming-What do the numbers show ? Presentation at University of Alabama, Huntsville, AL, October 4, 2007. Retrieved from, February 17, 2010.
25. Clough, M.P., (2003, January). Explicit but insufficient: Additional considerations for successful NOS instruction. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers, St. Louis, MO.
26. Collins, H.M., &, Pinch, T., (1998). The golem: What you should know about science (2nd ed.) Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27. Creswell, J., (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
28. Driver, R., Newton, P., &, Osborne, J., (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
29. Durkee, P., (1974). An analysis of the appropriateness and utilization of TOUS with special reference to high-ability students studying physics. Science Education, 58 (3), 343-356.
30. Duschl, R.A., (1988). Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education. Science Education, 72, 51-62.
31. Duschl, R.A., (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
32. Duschl, R.A., &, Wright, E., (1989). A case study of high school teachers' decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 467-501.
33. Earth Science Curriculum Project. (1973). Investigating the Earth. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
34. Fleming, R., (1986a). Adolescent reasoning in socioscientific issues, Part I: Social cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 677-687.
35. Fleming, R., (1986b). Adolescent reasoning in socioscientific issues, Part II: Nonsocial cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 689-698.
36. Gallagher, J.J., (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 121-134.
37. Gess-Newsome, J., (1999). Teachers' knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and its impact on instruction. In, J. Gess-Newsome, &, N.G. Lederman, (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51-94). the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
38. Hanuscin, D., Akerson, V., &, Phillipson-Mower, T., (2006). Integrating nature of science instruction into a physical science content course for preservice elementary teachers: NOS views of teaching assistants. Science Education, 90, 912-935. (Pubitemid 44298292)
39. Hodson, D., (1993). Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children's understanding of science: Some preliminary findings. Interchange, 24 (1&2), 41-52.
40. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007) Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the Fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.
41. Johnston, A.T., &, Southerland, S.A., (2002) Conceptual ecologies and their influence on nature of science conceptions: More dazed and confused than ever. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
42. Karplus, R., &, Thier, H., (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.
43. Khishfe, R., (2008). The development of seventh graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 45, 470-496. (Pubitemid 351584440)
44. Khishfe, R., &, Abd-El-Khalick, F., (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551-578.
45. Khishfe, R., &, Lederman, N., (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 395-418.
46. Khishfe, R., &, Lederman, N., (2007). Relationship between instructional context and views of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 939-961.
47. King, B.B., (1991). Beginning teachers' knowledge of and attitude toward history and philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 135-141.
48. Labinger J.A., &, Collins H., (Eds.). (2001). The one culture ? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Lakin, S., &, Wellington, J., (1994). Who will teach the 'nature of science'? Teachers' views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16 (2), 175-190.
50. Lantz, O., &, Kass, H., (1987). Chemistry teachers' functional paradigms. Science Education, 71, 117-134.
51. Laudan, L., (1990). Science and relativism: Some key controversies in the philosophy of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Lave, J., &, Wenger, E., (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
53. Leach, J., Hind, A., &, Ryder, J., (2003). Designing and evaluating short teaching interventions about the epistemology of science in high school classrooms. Science Education, 87, 831-848. (Pubitemid 38614481)
54. Lederman, N.G., (1998). The state of science education: Subject mater without content. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3, 1-12.
55. Lederman, N.G., (2007). The nature of science: Past, present, and future. In, S.K. Abell, &, N.G. Lederman, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Publishers.
56. Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., &, Schwartz, R.S., (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
57. Liu, S., &, Lederman, N.G., (2002). Taiwanese gifted students' views of nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 114-122.
58. Matkins, J.J., &, Bell, R.L., (2007). Awakening the scientist inside: Global climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 137-163.
59. McComas, W.F., Clough, M.P., &, Almazroa, H., (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. Science & Education, 7, 511-532.
60. Mellado, V., (1997). Preservice teachers' classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 331-354.
61. Metz, K.E., (1998). Scientific inquiry within reach of young children. In, B.J. Frazer, &, K. Tobin, (Eds.), International Handbook in Science Education. the Netherlands: Kluwer Publishers.
62. Moran, J.M., (2010). Climate studies. Boston: The American Meteorological Society.
63. Morrison, J.A., Raab, F., &, Ingram, D., (2009). Factors influencing elementary and secondary teachers' views on the nature of science. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 46, 384-403.
64. Murcia, K., &, Schibeci, R., (1999). Primary student teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1123-1140.
65. National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
66. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2010). Students' cloud observations online, last accessed April 13, 2010.
67. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
68. National Science Teachers Association. (2000). NSTA position statement: Nature of science. Retrieved February 9, 2010 from:.
69. Olson, J.K., &, Clough, M.P., (2001, November). Secondary science teachers' implementation practices following a course emphasizing contextualized and decontextualized nature of science instruction. Paper presented at the 6th International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Conference, Denver, CO.
70. Orgill, M., (2007). Situated cognition. In:, G.M. Bodner, &, M. Orwill, (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for research in chemistry/science education (pp. 187-203). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
71. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., &, Duschl, R., (2003). What "ideas-about-science" should be taught in school? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720.
72. Rezba, R.J., Sprague, C.R., McDonnough, J.T., &, Matkins, J.J., (2007). Learning and assessing science process skills. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall-Hunt.
73. Roth, W.-M., (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
74. Ryder, J., Leach, J., &, Driver, R., (1999). Undergraduate science students' images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36, 201-219. (Pubitemid 129534714)
75. Sadler, T.D., (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513-536.
76. Sadler, T.D., Chambers, F.W., &, Zeidler, D.L., (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 387-409. (Pubitemid 38261911)
77. Scott, P., Asoko, H., &, Leach, J., (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In, S. Abell, &, N. Lederman, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 31-74). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. Shapiro, B.L., (1996). A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the "face of science that does not yet know." Science Education, 80, 535-560.
79. Scharmann, L.C., Smith, M.U., James, M.C., &, Jensen, M., (2005). Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: Evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16 (1), 27-41. (Pubitemid 40550576)
80. Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N.G., &, Crawford, B., (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645. (Pubitemid 39056840)
81. Slattery, W., (1997) Teaching the nature of science in a college earth science class designed for preservice elementary and middle school teachers. In P. Rubba, J. Rye, P. Keig (Eds.) Proceedings of the 1997 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. Pensacola, FL: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.
82. Smith, D.C., &, Anderson, C.W., (1999). Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 755-776. (Pubitemid 129542158)
83. Smith, M.U., Lederman, N.G., Bell, R.L., McComas, W.F., &, Clough, M.P., (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science? A response to Alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1101-1103.
84. Smith, M.U., &, Scharmann, L.C., (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83, 493-509.
85. Sneider, C., (1985). Oobleck. Great Explorations in Mathematics and Science. CA: Lawrence Hall of Science.
86. Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., &, McCarthy, S., (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 409-421.
87. Southerland, S.A., Gess-Newsome, J., &, Johnston, A., (2003). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists' beliefs in classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 669-691.
88. Spector, B., Strong, P., &, LaPorta, T., (1998). Teaching the nature of science as an element of science, technology and society. In, W.F. McComas, (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 267-276). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
89. Springston, R., (1997, April 24). Theory: Taming a wild guess. The Richmond Times Dispatch, pp. C1, C4.
90. Stanley, W.B., &, Brickhouse, N., (2001). Teaching science: The multicultural question revisited. Science Education, 85, 35-49.
91. Tao, P., (2003). Eliciting and developing junior secondary students' understanding of the nature of science through a peer collaboration instruction in science stories. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 147-171. (Pubitemid 38193112)
92. Trumbull, D.J., Scrano, G., &, Bonney, R., (2006). The relations among two teachers' practices and beliefs, conceptualizations of the nature of science, and their implementation of student independent inquiry projects. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1717-1750. (Pubitemid 44688431)
93. Taylor, C., (1996). Defining science: A rhetoric of demarcation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
94. Tsai, C.C., (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (8), 771-783.
95. Wells, G., (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Wigley, T.M.L., Ramaswamy, V., Christy, J.R., Lanzante, J.R., Mears, C.A., Santer, B.D., &, Folland, C.K., (2006, April). Temperature trends in the lower atmosphere: Steps for understanding and reconciling differences. Climate Change Science Program. Retrieved 2007-04-04.
97. World Bank Group. (2010). World development report 2010. Development and climate change. Washington: World Bank.