Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 395-418

  Khishfe, Rola ^a   Lederman, Norman ^b  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS); OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONNAIRE; SEMISTRUCTURED INTERVIEWS;

GLOBAL WARMING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 33645783189     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20137     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N.G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Author (2002). Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
6. Bell, R.L., Lederman, N.G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one's conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563-581.
7. Bell, R.L., & Matkins, J.J. (2003). Learning about the nature of science in an elementary science methods course: Content vs. context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Philadelphia, PA.
8. Bentley, M.L., & Fleury, S.C. (1998). Of starting points and destinations: Teacher education and the nature of science. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science and science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 277-291). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
9. Brickhouse, N.W., Dagher, Z.R., Letts, W.J., & Shipman, H.L. (2000). Diversity of students' views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 340-362.
10. Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: A study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514-529.
11. Clough, M.P. (2003, January). Explicit but insufficient: Additional considerations for successful NOS Instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers, St. Louis, MO.
12. Crumb, G.H. (1965). Understanding of science in high school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 246-250.
13. Durkee, P. (1974). An analysis of the appropriateness and utilization of TOUS with special reference to high-ability students studying physics. Science Education, 58, 343-356.
14. Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85, 554-567.
15. Glass, G.V. & Stanley, J.C. (1970). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Herron, J.D., Luce, T.G., & Neie, V.E. (1976). The proper experimental unit: Comparative analyses of empirical data. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13, 19-27.
17. Hurlbert, S.H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54, 187-211.
18. Jungwirth, E. (1970). An evaluation of the attained development of the intellectual skills needed for understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry by BSCS pupils in Israel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 141-151.
19. Klopfer, L., & Cooley, W. (1963). The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 33-47.
20. Leach, J., Hind, A., & Ryder, J. (2003). Designing and evaluating short teaching interventions about the epistemology of science in high school classrooms. Science Education, 87, 831-848.
21. Lederman, N.G. (in press). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. Handbook of research in science education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
23. Lederman, N.G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science and science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83-126). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
24. Lederman, L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
25. Lederman, N.G., & Niess, M. (2001). Not-so-common "common" knowledge. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 1-4.
26. Lederman, N.G., & O'Malley (1990).
27. Lederman, N.G., Wade, P.D., & Bell, R.L. (1998). Assessing the nature of science: What is the nature of our assessments? Science and Education, 7, 595-615.
28. Liu, S., & Lederman, N.G. (2002). Taiwanese gifted students' views of nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 114-123.
29. Meichtry, Y.J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 389-407.
30. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
31. Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61-86.
32. Raths, J. (1967). The appropriate experimental unit. Educational Leadership, 25, 263-266.
33. Rudolph, J.L. (2003). Portraying epistemology: School science in historical context. Science Education, 87, 64-79.
34. Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students' images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 201-220.
35. Sadler, T.D., Chambers, W.F., & Zeidler, D. (2002). Investigating the crossroads of socioscientific issues, the nature of science, and critical thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
36. Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N.G., & Smith, M. (1999). Modeling success during earth science week. Science Scope, 23, 36-37.
37. Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 409-421.
38. Spector, B., Strong, P., & La Porta, T. (1998). Teaching the nature of science as an element of science, technology and society. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science and science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 267-276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
39. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
40. Tamir, P. (1972). Understanding the process of science by students exposed to different science curricula in Israel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9, 239-245.
41. Trent, J. (1965). The attainment of the concept "understanding science" using contrasting physics courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 224-229.
42. Welch, W.W., & Walberg, H.J. (1972). A national experiment in curriculum evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 373-383.