Developing voice and empowerment: The first step towards a broad consultation in research agenda setting

Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 411-421

  Nierse, C J ^a   Abma, T A ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agenda setting process; Dialogue; Enclave deliberation; Participation; Responsive methodology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; EMPOWERMENT; HUMAN; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PARENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; VOICE;

CHILD; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MENTAL RETARDATION; MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; RESEARCH DESIGN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952604770     PISSN: 09642633     EISSN: 13652788     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01388.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abma T. A. (2001) Reflexive dialogues: a story about the development of injury prevention in two performing-arts schools. Evaluation 7, 238-52.
2. Abma T. A. (2005a) Patient participation in health research: research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qualitative Health Research 15, 1310-28.
3. Abma T. A. (2005b) Responsive evaluation: its meaning and special contribution to health promotion. Evaluation and Program Planning 28, 279-89.
4. Abma T. A. (2006) Patients as partners in a health research agenda setting: the feasibility of a participatory methodology. Evaluation & the Health Professions 29, 424-39.
5. Abma T. A. & Broerse J. E. (2010) Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas. Health Expectations 13, 73-160.
6. Abma T. A. & Stake R. E. (2001) Stake's responsive evaluation: core ideas and evolution. New Directions for Evaluation 2001, 7-22.
7. Abma T. A. & Widdershoven G. A. M. (2005) Sharing stories. Narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation. Evaluation & the Health Professions 28, 90-109.
8. Abma T. A. & Widdershoven G. A. M. (2008) Evaluation and/as social relation. Evaluation 14, 209-25.
9. Abma T. A., Nierse C. J. & Widdershoven G. A. M. (2009) Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qualitative Health Research 19, 401-15.
10. Balch G. & Mertens D. M. (1999) Focus group design and group dynamics: lessons from deaf and hard of hearing participants. American Journal of Evaluation 20, 265-77.
11. Baur V. E., Abma T. A. & Widdershoven G. A. M. (2010) Participation of marginalized groups in evaluation: mission impossible? Evaluation and Program Planning 33, 238-45.
12. Bigby C. & Frawley P. (2010) Reflections on doing inclusive research in the 'Making Life Good in the Community' study. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 35, 53-61.
13. Caron-Flinterman J. F. (2005) A New Voice in Science. Patient Participation in Decision-Making on Biomedical Research. VU Press, Amsterdam.
14. Cook T. & Inglis P. (2009) Making our own decisions: researching the process of 'being informed' with people with learning difficulties. Research Ethics Review 5, 55-64.
15. Garcia-Iriarte E., Kramer J. C., Kramer J. M. & Hammel J. (2009) 'Who did what?': a participatory action research project to increase group capacity for advocacy. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 22, 10-22.
16. Greene J. C. (2001) Dialogue in evaluation: a relational perspective. Evaluation 7, 181-7.
17. Greene J. C. (2006) Evaluation, democracy, and social change. In: Handbook of Evaluation: Policies, Programs and Practices (eds I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene & M. M. Mark ), pp. 118-40. Sage, London.
18. Guba E. G. & Lincoln Y. (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
19. Holland T. (2008) Determining priorities in intellectual disability research (Editorial). Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 52, 1-2.
20. Jerphanion R. (2005) [ Having a say in research] Zeggenschap in wetenschap. Paper presented at the Invitational conference 'Joining forces': research with people with intellectual disabilities.
21. Karpowitz C. F., Raphael C. & Hammond A. S. (2009) Deliberative democracy and inequality: two cheers for enclave deliberation among the disempowered. Politics & Society 37, 576-615.
22. Knox M., Mok M. & Parmenter T. R. (2000) Working with the experts: collaborative research with people with an intellectual disability. Disability & Society 15, 49-61.
23. McVilly K. R., Stancliffe R. J., Parmenter T. R. & Burton-Smith R. M. (2006) Self-advocates have the last say on friendship. Disability & Society 21, 693-708.
24. Meadows L. & Morse J. M. (2001) Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. In: The Nature of Evidence in Qualitative Inquiry (eds J. M. Morse, J. Swanson & A. J. Kuzel ), pp. 187-202. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
25. Mertens D. M., Farley J., Madison A. M. & Singleton P. (1994) Diverse voices in evaluation practice: feminists, minorities, and persons with disabilities. American Journal of Evaluation 15, 123-9.
26. Nolan M., Hanson E., Grant G. & Keady J. (2007) User Participation in Health and Social Care Research. Voices, Values and Evaluation. Open University Press, Maidenhead.
27. Oliver M. (1992) Changing the social relations of research production? Disability, Handicap & Society 7, 101-14.
28. Raad voor Gezondheidsonderzoek (RGO) (2005) [ Report on Disabilities and Possibilities. Research for People with Intellectual Disabilities] Advies Beperkingen en Mogelijkheden. Ondezoek bij mensen met een verstandelijke beperking. Raad voor Gezondheidsonderzoek, The Hague.
29. Ramcharan P., Grant G. & Flynn M. (2004) Emancipatory and participatory research: how far have we come? In: The International Handbook of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (eds E. Emerson, C. Hatton, T. Thompson & T. R. Parmenter ), pp. 83-111. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
30. Richardson M. (2000) How we live: participatory research with six people with learning difficulties. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32, 1383-95.
31. Schipper K., Abma T. A., van Zadelhoff E., van de Griendt J., Nierse C. J. & Widdershoven G. A. M. (2010) What does it mean to be a patient research partner? An ethnodrama. Qualitative Inquiry 16, 501-10.
32. Stake R. E. (1975) To evaluate an arts program. In: Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach (ed. R. E. Stake ), pp. 13-31. Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, OH.
33. Stake R. E. (2004) Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
34. VanderPlaat M. (1999) Locating the feminist scholar: relational empowerment and social activism. Qualitative Health Research 9, 773-85.
35. Walmsley J. & Johnson K. (2003) Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities. Past, Present and Futures. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
36. Williams V. (1999) Researching together. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 27, 48-51.
37. Williams V. (2005) 'Did you solve it yourself ?' Evaluation of self narratives of discrimination by people with 'learning difficulties'. Communication & Medicine 2, 77-89.
38. Williams V. & Simons K. (2005) More researching together: the role of nondisabled researchers in working with People First members. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 33, 6-14.
39. Williams V., Marriott A. & Townsley R. (2008) Shaping our future: a scoping and consultation exercise to establish research priorities in learning disabilities for the next ten years. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D, Bristol.