Towards an understanding of the adaptation of wine yeasts to must: Relevance of the osmotic stress response

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 89, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1551-1561

  Jiménez Martí, Elena ^a   Gomar Alba, Mercè ^a   Palacios, Antonio ^b   Ortiz Julien, Anne ^c   Del Olmo, Marcel Li ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LA RIOJA   (Spain)

^c LALLEMAND SAS   (France)

Author keywords

Gene expression; Glycerol; Osmotic stress; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Vinification; Vitality; Wine yeasts

Indexed keywords

OSMOTIC STRESS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VINIFICATION; VITALITY; WINE YEASTS;

BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOSYNTHESIS; BREWERIES; ETHANOL; GENE EXPRESSION; GLUCOSE; GLYCEROL; OSMOSIS; STRAIN; WINE;

YEAST;

GLUCOSE; GLYCEROL; SUGAR;

GENE EXPRESSION; OSMOSIS; SUGAR; TRANSFORMATION; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CELL LEVEL; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE EXPRESSION; INOCULATION; INTRACELLULAR FLUID; LABORATORY TEST; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC STRESS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; VINICULTURE; WINE; YEAST;

ETHANOL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GLYCEROL; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PLANT EXTRACTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; VITIS; WINE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VITACEAE;

EID: 79952573397     PISSN: 01757598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2909-4     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Attfield PV (1997) Stress tolerance. The key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast. Nat Biotechnol 15:1351-1357
2. Blomberg A, Adler L (1992) Physiology of osmotolerance in fungi. Adv Microb Physiol 33:145-212
3. Boulton RB, Singleton VL, Bisson LF, Kunkee RE (1996) Yeast and biochemistry of ethanol fermentation. Principles and practices of winemaking. The Chapman & Hall Enology Library, New York, pp 123-126
4. Cambon B, Monteil V, Remize F, Camarasa C, Dequin S (2006) Effects of GPD1 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae comercial wine yeast strains lacking ALD6 genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4688-4694 (Pubitemid 44088319)
5. Cardona F, Carrasco P, Pérez-Ortín JE, del Olmo M, Aranda A (2007) A novel approach for the improvement of stress resistance in wine yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 114:83-91 (Pubitemid 46186576)
6. Carrasco P, Pérez-Ortín JE, del Olmo M (2003) Arginase activity is a useful marker for nitrogen limitation during alcoholic fermentation. Syst Appl Microbiol 26:471-479 (Pubitemid 37139768)
7. Causton HC, Ren B, Koh SS, Harbison CT, Kanin E, Jennings EG, Lee TI, True HL, Lander ES, Young RA (2001) Remodeling of gene genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 12:323-337 (Pubitemid 33051578)
8. Degré R (1993) Selection and commercial cultivation of wine yeasts and bacteria. In: Fleet GH (ed) Wine microbiology and biotechnology. Harwood Academic Publishers, Philadephia, pp 421-447
9. Erasmus DJ, van der Merwe GK, van Vuuren HJJ (2003) Genomewide analyses: metabolic adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high sugar stress. FEMS Yeast Res 3:375-399 (Pubitemid 36570317)
10. + symporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 16:2068-2076
11. Ferrigno P, Posas F, Koepp D, Saito H, Silver PA (1998) Regulated nucleo/cytoplasmic exchange of HOG1 MAPK requires the importin β homologs NMD5 and XPO1. EMBO J 17:5606-5614 (Pubitemid 28445972)
12. Gancedo JM (2008) The early steps of glucose signalling in yeast. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:673-704
13. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11:4241-4257
14. Hohmann S, Mager WH (2003) Yeast stress responses Springer- Verlag. Heidelberg, Berlin
15. Holst B, Lunde C, Lages F, Oliveira R, Lucas C, Kielland-Brandt MC (2000) GUP1 and its close homologue GUP2, encoding multimembrane-sapnning proteins involved in active glycerol uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 37:108-124 (Pubitemid 30479361)
16. Iwaki T, Tamai Y, Watanabe Y (1999) Two putative MAP kinase genes, ZrHOG1 and ZrHOG2, cloned from the salt-tolerant yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii are functionarlly homologous to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HOG1 gene. Microbiology 145:241-248 (Pubitemid 29043596)
17. Jiménez-Martí E, del Olmo M (2008) Addition of ammonia or amino acids to a nitrogen-depleted medium affects gene expression patterns in yeast cells during alcoholic fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res 8:245-256 (Pubitemid 351208180)
18. Jiménez-Martí E, Zuzuarregui A, Ridaura I, Lozano N, del Olmo M (2009) Genetic manipulation of HSP26 and YHR087W stress genes may improve fermentative behaviour in wine yeasts under vinification conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 130:122-130
19. Kaeberlein M, Andalis AA, Fink GR, Guarente L (2002) High osmolarity extends life span in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a mechanism related to calorie restriction. Mol Cell Biol 22:8056-8066 (Pubitemid 35217313)
20. Lages F, Lucas C (1997) Contribution to the physiological characterization of glycerol active uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Acta 1322:8-18 (Pubitemid 27497124)
21. Llauradó JM, Rozés N, Constantí M, Mas A (2005) Study of some Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for winemaking after preadaptation at low temperatures. J Agric Food Chem 53:1003-1011 (Pubitemid 40270390)
22. Luyten K, Albertyn J, Skibbe WF, Prior BA, Ramos J, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S (1995) Fps1, a yeast member of the MIP family of channel proteins, is a facilitator for glycerol uptake and efflux and is inactive under osmotic stress. EMBO J 14:1360-1371
23. Mendes-Ferreira A, del Olmo M, García-Martínez J, Jiménez-Martí E, Mendes-Faia A, Pérez-Ortín JE, Leao C (2007) Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to different nitrogen concentrations during alcoholic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3049-3060 (Pubitemid 46718590)
24. Novo M, Beltran G, Guillamon RN, JM SS, Leberre V, François J, Mas A (2007) Early transcriptional response of wine yeast after rehydration: osmotic shock and metabolic activation. FEMS Yeast Res 7:304-316
25. Panadero J, Hernández-López MJ, Prieto JA, Randez-Gil F (2007) Overexpression of the calcineurin target CRZ1 provides freeze tolerance and enhances the fermentative capacity of baker's yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4824-4831
26. Pavlik P, Simon M, Schuster T, Ruis H (1993) The glycerol kinase (GUT1) gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: cloning and characterization. Curr Genet 24:21-25 (Pubitemid 23240886)
27. Pérez-Torrado R, Gimeno-Alcañiz JV, Matallana E (2002) Wine yeast strains engineered for glycogen overproduction display an enhanced viability under glucose deprivation conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3339-3344 (Pubitemid 34734029)
28. Pérez-Torrado R, Gómez-Pastor R, Larsson C, Matallana E (2009) Fermentative capacity of dry active yeast requires a specific oxidative stress response during industrial biomass growth. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81:951-960
29. Posas F, Chambers JR, Heyman JA, Hoeffler JP, de Nadal E, Ariño J (2000) The transcriptional response of yeast to saline stress. J Biol Chem 275:17249-17255
30. Pretorius IS (2000) Tailoring wine yeasts for the new millenium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16:675-729
31. Querol A, Barrio E, Huerta T, Ramón D (1992) Molecular monitoring of wine fermentations conducted by active dry yeast strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2948-2953
32. Reiser V, Ruis H, Ammerer G (1999) Kinase activity-dependent nuclear export opposes stress-induced nuclear accumulation and retention of Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 10:1147-1161 (Pubitemid 29193737)
33. Remize F, Roustan JL, Sablayrolles JM, Barre P, Dequin S (1999) Glycerol overproduction by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains leads to substantial changes in by-product and to a stimulation of fermentation rate in stationary phase. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:143-149 (Pubitemid 29029631)
34. Rep M, Albertyn J, Thevelein J, Prior BA, Hohmann S (1999a) Different signalling pathways contribute to the control of GPD1 gene expression by osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 145:715-727 (Pubitemid 29127052)
35. Rep M, Reiser V, Gartner U, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S, Ammerer G, Ruis H (1999b) Osmotic stress-induced gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires Msn1p and the novel nuclear factor Hot1p. Mol Cell Biol 19:5474-5485 (Pubitemid 29339905)
36. Rep M, Krantz M, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S (2000) The transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic shock Hot1p and Msn2p/Msn4p are required for the induction of subsets of high osmolarity glycerol pathway-dependent genes. J Biol Chem 275:8290-8300 (Pubitemid 30180168)
37. Ribéreau-Gayon P, Dubourdieu D, Donèche B, Lonvaud A (2001) Cytology, taxonomy and ecology of grape and wine yeast. In: Ribéreau-Gayon P (ed) The microbiology of wine and vinifications. Wiley, New York, pp 1-50
38. Ronnow B, Kielland-Brandt MC (1993) GUT2, a gene doe mitochondrial glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 9:1121-1130 (Pubitemid 23319717)
39. Rossignol T, Dulau L, Julien A, Blondin B (2003) Genome-wide monitoring of wine yeast gene expression during alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 20:1369-1385 (Pubitemid 38016631)
40. Rossignol T, Postaire O, Storaï J, Blondin B (2006) Analysis of the genomic response of a wine yeast to rehydration and inoculation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 5:699-712 (Pubitemid 44114797)
41. Santangelo GM (2006) Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70:253-282
42. Schmittgen T, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc 3:1101-1108 (Pubitemid 351818697)
43. Schuller D, Casal M (2005) The use of genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in the wine industry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68:292-304 (Pubitemid 41159999)
44. Zuzuarregui A, del Olmo M (2004) Analysis of stress resistance under laboratory conditions constitute a suitable criterion for wine yeast selection. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 85:271-280 (Pubitemid 38461060)
45. Zuzuarregui A, Monteoliva L, Gil C, del Olmo M (2006) Transcriptomic and proteomic approach for understanding the molecular basis of adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to wine fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:836-847