FRED pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 578-596

  McGann, Mark ^a,b  

^a OpenEye Scientific Software Inc   (United States)

^b OpenEye Scientific Software   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROLIFERATION;

BOUND LIGANDS; DOCKING PROGRAMS; DOCKING STUDIES; HYBRID MODE; POSE PREDICTIONS; PROTEIN STRUCTURES; STATISTICAL POWER; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

MOLECULAR MODELING;

EID: 79952262090     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci100436p     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Warren, G. L.; Andrews, C. W.; Capelli, A.; Clarke, B.; LaLonde, J.; Lambert, M. H.; Lindvall, M.; Nevins, N.; Semus, S. F.; Senger, S.; Tedesco, G.; Wall, I. D.; Woolven, J. M.; Pieshoff, C. E.; Head, M. S. A Critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5912-5913
2. Hawkins, P. C. D.; Skillman, G. A.; Nicholls, A. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 74-82 (Pubitemid 46105500)
3. Cleves, A. E.; Jain, A. N. Effects of inductive bias on computational evaluations of ligand-based modeling and on drug discovery J. Comput-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 147-159
4. Fingerprints: Screening and Similarity. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc. http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.finger.html (accessed November 2, 2010).
5. Vidal, D.; Thormann, M.; Pons, M. LINGO: An efficient holographic text-based method to calculate biophysical properties and intermolecular similarities J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 386-393 (Pubitemid 40635347)
6. Grant, J. A.; Haigh, J. A.; Pickup, B. T.; Nicholls, A.; Sayle, R. A. Lingos, finite state machines, and fast similarity searching J. Chem. Inf. Model 2006, 46, 1912-1918 (Pubitemid 44625962)
7. Grant, J. A.; Gallardo, M. A.; Pickup, B. T. A. Fast method of molecular shape comparison: A simple application of a gaussian description of molecular shape J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 1653-1666 (Pubitemid 126535414)
8. Rush, T. S.; Grant, J. A.; Mosyak, L.; Nicholls, A. A. Shape-based 3-D scaffold hopping method and its application to a bacterial protein-protein interaction J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1489-1495 (Pubitemid 40364556)
9. BROOD. OpenEye Scientific Software. http://www.eyesopen.com/products/ applications/brood.html (accessed November 2, 2010).
10. Salam, N. K.; Nuti, R.; Sherman, W. Novel method for generating structure-based pharmacophores using energetic analysis J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 2356-2368
11. Jain, A. N.; Nicholls, A. Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods J. Comput-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 133-139
12. Cross, J. B.; Thompson, D. C.; Rai, B. K; Baber, J. C.; Fan, K. Y.; Hu, Y.; Humblet, C. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: Pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy J. Chem. Inf. Model 2009, 49, 1455-1474
13. Shoichet, B. K.; Bodian, D. L.; Kuntz, I. D. Molecular docking using shape descriptors J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 380-397
14. Ewing, T. J. A.; Kuntz, I. D. Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1175-1189 (Pubitemid 127650573)
15. Kramer, B.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer, T. Evaluation of the FlexX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 1999, 37, 228-241 (Pubitemid 29503004)
16. Friesner, R. A.; Murphy, R. B.; Repasky, M. P.; Frye, L. L.; Greenwood, J. R.; Halgren, T. A.; Sanschagrin, P. C.; Mainz, D. T. Extra precision glide: Docking and Scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6177-6196 (Pubitemid 44595196)
17. Abagyan, R.; Totrov, M.; Kuznetsov, D. ICM. A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15, 488-506
18. Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Flexible protein-ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 1998, Suppl. 1, 215-220 (Pubitemid 28090502)
19. Joseph-McCarthy, D.; Thomas, B. E. I. V.; Belmarsh, M.; Moustakas, D.; Alvarez, J. C. Pharmacophore-based molecular docking to account for ligand flexibility Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2003, 51, 172-188 (Pubitemid 36397751)
20. Joseph-McCarthy, D.; McFadyen, I. J.; Zou, J.; Walker, G.; Alvarez, J. C. Pharmacophore-Based Molecular Docking: A Practical Guide. In Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery, 1 st ed.; Alvarez, J. C.; Schoichet, B., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2005; Vol. 1, pp 327 - 347.
21. Jain, A. N. Surflex: Fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 499-511 (Pubitemid 36182752)
22. Jain, A. N. Surflex-Dock 2.1: Robust performance from ligand energetic modeling, ring flexibility, and knowledge-based search J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2007, 21, 281-306 (Pubitemid 46630055)
23. Pham, T. A.; Jain, A. N. Parameter estimation for scoring protein-ligand interactions using negative training data J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5856-5868 (Pubitemid 44484932)
24. Jain, A. N. Scoring noncovalent protein-ligand interactions: A continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities J. Comput-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 427-440 (Pubitemid 126712439)
25. Lee, H. S.; Choi, J.; Kufareva, I.; Abagyan, R.; Filikov, A.; Yang, Y.; Yoon, S. Optimization of high throughput virtual screening by combining shape-matching and docking methods J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 489-497 (Pubitemid 351535418)
26. Bostrom, J.; Greenwood, J. R.; Gottfries, J. Assessing the performance of OMEGA with respect to retrieving bioactive conformations J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2003, 21, 449-462 (Pubitemid 36120775)
27. Perola, E.; Charifson, P. S. Conformational analysis of drug-like molecules bound to proteins: An extensive study of ligand reorganization upon binding J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2499-2510 (Pubitemid 38580088)
28. McGann, M. R.; Almond, H. R.; Nicholls, A.; Grant, J. A.; Brown, F. K. Gaussian docking functions Biopolymers 2003, 68, 76-90 (Pubitemid 36098309)
29. Verkivker, G. M.; Bouzida, D.; Gehlaar, D. K.; Rejto, P. A.; Arthurs, S.; Colson, A. B.; Freer, S. T.; Larson, V.; Luty, B. A.; Marrone, T.; Rose, P. W. Deciphering common failures in molecular docking of ligand-protein complexes J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 731-751
30. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions. I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445 (Pubitemid 127505895)
31. Stahl, M.; Rarey, M. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1035-1042 (Pubitemid 32852130)
32. Huang, N.; Shoichet, B. K.; Irwin, J. J. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6789-6801 (Pubitemid 44749746)
33. DUD: A Directory of Useful Decoys. http://dud.docking.org/ (accessed November 2, 2010).
34. Hartshorn, M. J.; Verdonk, M. L.; Chessari, G.; Brewerton, S. C.; Mooij, W. T. M.; Mortenson, P. N.; Murray, C. W. Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 726-741 (Pubitemid 46332985)
35. Hanley, J. A.; McNiel, B. J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Radiology 1982, 143, 29-36 (Pubitemid 12142173)
36. Nicholls, A. What Do We Know? Simple Statistical Techniques That Help. http://cups2010.eyesopen.com/attachments/0000/6947/ant-on-basic-statistics.pdf (accessed November 2, 2010).
37. Nicholls, A. What do we know and when do we know it? J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 133-139