Surflex: Fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 499-511

  Jain, Ajay N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

11 [4 [[5 [(4,4,5,5,5 PENTAFLUOROPENTYL)SULFONYL]PENTYL]OXY]PHENYL]ESTRADIOL; ACOLBIFENE; ANTIESTROGEN; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; LY 326315; LY 357489; N BUTYL 11 (3,17BETA DIHYDROXYESTRA 1,3,5(10) TRIEN 7ALPHA YL) N METHYLUNDECANAMIDE; NAFOXIDINE; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; RALOXIFENE; TAMOXIFEN; THYMIDINE KINASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZK 11901;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BINDING; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN TARGETING; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURFLEX;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HERPESVIRUS 1, HUMAN; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; THYMIDINE KINASE;

EID: 0037434582     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm020406h     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Walters, P. W.; Stahl, M. T.; Murcko, M. A. Virtual Screening - An Overview. Drug Discovery Today 1998, 3, 160-178.
2. Jain, A. N. Scoring noncovalent protein-ligand interactions: a continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 427-440.
3. Bohm, H. J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 243-256.
4. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445.
5. Rognan, D.; Lauemoller, S. L.; Holm, A.; Buus, S.; Tschinke, V. Predicting binding affinities of protein ligands from three-dimensional models: application to peptide binding to class I major histocompatibility proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4650-4658.
6. Wang, R.; Liu, L.; Lai, L.; Tang, Y. SCORE: A new empirical method for estimating the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex. J. Mol. Model. 1998, 4, 379-384.
7. Muegge, I.; Martin, Y. C. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 791-804.
8. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 337-356.
9. Welch, W.; Ruppert, J.; Jain, A. N. Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 449-462.
10. Goodsell, D. S.; Morris, G. M.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking of flexible ligands: applications of AutoDock. J. Mol. Recognit. 1996, 9, 1-5.
11. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
12. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261, 470-489.
13. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rognan, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4759-4767.
14. Jain, A. N. Morphological similarity: a 3D molecular similarity method correlated with protein-ligand recognition. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 199-213.
15. Ruppert, J.; Welch, W.; Jain, A. N. Automatic identification and representation of protein binding sites for molecular docking. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 524-533.
16. Pitman, M. C.; Huber, W. K.; Horn, H.; Kramer, A.; Rice, J. E.; et al. FLASHFLOOD: a 3D field-based similarity search and alignment method for flexible molecules. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 587-612.