T cell responses in lymph nodes

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 107-116

  Bogle, Gib ^a   Dunbar, P Rod ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANTIGEN PRESENTING CELL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL MOTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; LYMPH NODE; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; T LYMPHOCYTE;

ANIMALS; ANTIGEN-PRESENTING CELLS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL MOVEMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; T-LYMPHOCYTES;

EID: 79952116914     PISSN: 19395094     EISSN: 1939005X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.47     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Willard-Mack CL. Normal structure, function, and histology of lymph nodes. Toxicol Pathol 2006, 34:409-424.
2. Bousso P, Robey EA. Dynamic behavior of T cells and thymocytes in lymphoid organs as revealed by twophoton microscopy. Immunity 2004, 21:349-355.
3. Cahalan MD, Parker I, Wei SH, Miller MJ. Real-time imaging of lymphocytes in vivo. Curr Opin Immunol 2003, 15:372-377.
4. Miller MJ, Safrina O, Parker I, Cahalan MD. Imaging the single cell dynamics of CD4+T cell activation by dendritic cells in lymph nodes. J Exp Med 2004, 200:847-856.
5. Miller MJ, Wei SH, Cahalan MD, Parker I. Autonomous T cell trafficking examined in vivo with intravital two-photon microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:2604-2609.
6. Miller MJ, Wei SH, Parker I, Cahalan MD. Twophoton imaging of lymphocyte motility and antigen response in intact lymph node. Science 2002, 296:1869-1873.
7. Wei SH, Parker I, Miller MJ, Cahalan MD. A stochastic view of lymphocyte motility and trafficking within the lymph node. Immunol Rev 2003, 195:136-159.
8. Worbs T, Mempel TR, Bolter J, von Andrian UH, Forster R. CCR7 ligands stimulate the intranodal motility of T lymphocytes in vivo. J Exp Med 2007, 204:489-495.
9. Bajenoff M, Egen JG, Koo LY, Laugier JP, Brau F, et al. Stromal cell networks regulate lymphocyte entry, migration, and territoriality in lymph nodes. Immunity 2006, 25:989-1001.
10. Katakai T, Hara T, Lee JH, Gonda H, Sugai M, et al. A novel reticular stromal structure in lymph node cortex: an immuno-platform for interactions among dendritic cells, T cells and B cells. Int Immunol 2004, 16:1133-1142.
11. Katakai T, Hara T, Sugai M, Gonda H, Shimizu A. Lymph node fibroblastic reticular cells construct the stromal reticulum via contact with lymphocytes. J Exp Med 2004, 200:783-795.
12. Mempel TR, Henrickson SE, Von Andrian UH. T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases. Nature 2004, 427:154-159.
13. Thorne BC, Bailey AM, Peirce SM. Combining experiments with multi-cell agent-based modeling to study biological tissue patterning. Brief Bioinform 2007, 8:245-257.
14. Meier-Schellersheim M, Xu X, Angermann B, Kunkel EJ, Jin T, et al. Key role of local regulation in chemosensing revealed by a new molecular interactionbased modeling method. PLoS Comput Biol 2006, 2:e82.
15. Pogson M, Smallwood R, Qwarnstrom E, Holcombe M. Formal agent-basedmodelling of intracellular chemical interactions. Biosystems 2006, 85:37-45.
16. Pratt SC, Sumpter DJT, Mallon EB, Franks NR. An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Anim Behav 2005, 70:1023-1036.
17. Bauer AL, Beauchemin CAA, Perelson AS. Agent-based modeling of host-pathogen systems: the successes and challenges. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.0247v1q-bio.CB. Accessed July 1, 2008.
18. Celada F, Seiden PE. A computer model of cellular interactions in the immune system. Immunol Today 1992, 13:56-62.
19. Bernaschi M, Castiglione F. Design and implementation of an immune system simulator. Comput Biol Med 2001, 31:303-331.
20. BernaschiM, Succi S, Castiglione F. Large-scale cellular automata simulations of the immune system response. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 2000, 61:1851-1854.
21. Castiglione F, Toschi F, BernaschiM, Succi S, Benedetti R, et al. Computational modeling of the immune response to tumor antigens. J Theor Biol 2005, 237:390-400.
22. Meier-Schellersheim M, Mack G. SIMMUNE, a tool for simulating and analyzing immune system behavior. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9903017v1cs.MA. Accessed March 28, 1999.
23. Folcik VA, An GC, Orosz CG. The Basic Immune Simulator: an agent-based model to study the interactions between innate and adaptive immunity. Theor BiolMed Model 2007, 4:39.
24. Walker D, Wood S, Southgate J, Holcombe M, Smallwood R. An integrated agent-mathematical model of the effect of intercellular signalling via the epidermal growth factor receptor on cell proliferation. J Theor Biol 2006, 242:774-789.
25. Walker DC, Southgate J, Hill G, Holcombe M, Hose DR, et al. The epitheliome: agent-based modelling of the social behaviour of cells. Biosystems 2004, 76:89-100.
26. Meyer-Hermann ME, Maini PK. Interpreting twophoton imaging data of lymphocyte motility. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2005, 71:061912.
27. Graner F, Glazier JA. Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. Phys Rev Lett 1992, 69:2013-2016.
28. Beltman JB,Maree AF, de Boer RJ. Spatialmodelling of brief and long interactions between T cells and dendritic cells. Immunol Cell Biol 2007, 85:306-314.
29. Beltman JB, Maree AF, Lynch JN, Miller MJ, de Boer RJ. Lymph node topology dictates T cell migration behavior. J ExpMed 2007, 204:771-780.
30. Beauchemin C, Dixit NM, Perelson AS. Characterizing T cell movement within lymph nodes in the absence of antigen. J Immunol 2007, 178:5505-5512.
31. Kirschner DE, Chang ST, Riggs TW, Perry N, Linderman JJ. Toward a multiscale model of antigen presentation in immunity. Immunol Rev 2007, 216:93-118.
32. Riggs T, Walts A, Perry N, Bickle L, Lynch JN, et al. A comparison of random vs. chemotaxis-driven contacts of T cells with dendritic cells during repertoire scanning. J Theor Biol 2008, 250:732-751.
33. Zheng H, Jin B, Henrickson SE, Perelson AS, von Andrian UH, et al. How antigen quantity and quality determine T-cell decisions in lymphoid tissue. Mol Cell Biol 2008, 28:4040-4051.
34. Bogle G, Dunbar PR. Simulating T-cell motility in the lymph node paracortex with a packed lattice geometry. Immunol Cell Biol 2008, 86:676-687.
35. Catron DM, Itano AA, Pape KA, Mueller DL, Jenkins MK. Visualizing the first 50 hr of the primary immune response to a soluble antigen. Immunity 2004, 21:341-347.
36. Cahill RN, Frost H, Trnka Z. The effects of antigen on the migration of recirculating lymphocytes through single lymph nodes. J ExpMed 1976, 143:870-888.
37. Hay JB, Hobbs BB. The flow of blood to lymph nodes and its relation to lymphocyte traffic and the immune response. J ExpMed 1977, 145:31-44.
38. Soderberg KA, Payne GW, Sato A, Medzhitov R, Segal SS, et al. Innate control of adaptive immunity via remodeling of lymph node feed arteriole. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:16315-16320.
39. Webster B, Ekland EH, Agle LM, Chyou S, Ruggieri R, et al. Regulation of lymph node vascular growth by dendritic cells. J ExpMed 2006, 203:1903-1913.
40. Rosen H, Goetzl EJ. Sphingosine 1-phosphate and its receptors: an autocrine and paracrine network. Nat Rev Immunol 2005, 5:560-570.
41. Rosen H, Gonzalez-Cabrera P, Marsolais D, Cahalan S, Don AS, et al. Modulating tone: the overture of S1P receptor immunotherapeutics. Immunol Rev 2008, 223:221-235.
42. Sanna MG, Wang SK, Gonzalez-Cabrera PJ, Don A, Marsolais D, et al. Enhancement of capillary leakage and restoration of lymphocyte egress by a chiral S1P1 antagonist in vivo. Nat Chem Biol 2006, 2:434-441.
43. Miller MJ, Hejazi AS, Wei SH, Cahalan MD, Parker I. T cell repertoire scanning is promoted by dynamic dendritic cell behavior and random T cell motility in the lymph node. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:998-1003.
44. Angel CE, Chen CJ, Horlacher OC, Winkler S, John T, et al. Distinctive localization of antigen-presenting cells in human lymph nodes. Blood 2009, 113:1257-1267.
45. Bajenoff M, Granjeaud S, Guerder S. The strategy of T cell antigen-presenting cell encounter in antigendraining lymph nodes revealed by imaging of initial T cell activation. J ExpMed 2003, 198:715-724.
46. Friedl P, Gunzer M. Interaction of T cells with APCs: the serial encounter model. Trends Immunol 2001, 22:187-191.
47. Langenkamp A, Casorati G, Garavaglia C, Dellabona P, Lanzavecchia A, et al. T cell priming by dendritic cells: thresholds for proliferation, differentiation and death and intraclonal functional diversification. Eur J Immunol 2002, 32:2046-2054.
48. Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. Dynamics of T lymphocyte responses: intermediates, effectors, and memory cells. Science 2000, 290:92-97.
49. Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. Regulation of T cell immunity by dendritic cells. Cell 2001, 106:263-266.
50. Viola A, Lanzavecchia A. T cell activation determined by T cell receptor number and tunable thresholds. Science 1996, 273:104-106.
51. Bromley SK, Burack WR, Johnson KG, Somersalo K, Sims TN, et al. The immunological synapse. Annu Rev Immunol 2001, 19:375-396.
52. Coombs D, Goldstein B. T cell activation: kinetic proofreading, serial engagement and cell adhesion. J Comput Appl Math 2005, 184:121-139.
53. Figge MT, Meyer-Hermann M. Geometrically repatterned immunological synapses uncover formation mechanisms. PLoS Comput Biol 2006, 2:e171.
54. Lee KH, Dinner AR, Tu C, Campi G, Raychaudhuri S, et al. The immunological synapse balances T cell receptor signaling and degradation. Science 2003, 302:1218-1222.
55. Mossman KD, Campi G, Groves JT, Dustin ML. Altered TCR signaling from geometrically repatterned immunological synapses. Science 2005, 310:1191-1193.
56. Bousso P, Robey E. Dynamics of CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes. Nat Immunol 2003, 4:579-585.
57. Malek TR. The biology of interleukin-2. Annu Rev Immunol 2008, 26:453-479.
58. Fallon EM, Lauffenburger DA. Computational model for effects of ligand/receptor binding properties on interleukin-2 trafficking dynamics and T cell proliferation response. Biotechnol Prog 2000, 16:905-916.
59. Jansson A, HarlenM, Karlsson S, Nilsson P, Cooley M. 3D computation modelling of the influence of cytokine secretion on Th-cell development suggests that negative selection (inhibition of Th1 cells) is more effective than positive selection by IL-4 for Th2 cell dominance. Immunol Cell Biol 2007, 85:189-196.
60. Beyer T, Meyer-Hermann M, Soff G. A possible role of chemotaxis in germinal center formation. Int Immunol 2002, 14:1369-1381.
61. Meyer-Hermann M. A mathematical model for the germinal center morphology and affinity maturation. J Theor Biol 2002, 216:273-300.
62. Meyer-Hermann ME, Maini PK. Cutting edge: back to "one-way" germinal centers. J Immunol 2005, 174:2489-2493.
63. Gretz JE, Anderson AO, Shaw S. Cords, channels, corridors and conduits: critical architectural elements facilitating cell interactions in the lymph node cortex. Immunol Rev 1997, 156:11-24.
64. Gretz JE, Kaldjian EP, Anderson AO, Shaw S. Sophisticated strategies for information encounter in the lymph node: the reticular network as a conduit of soluble information and a highway for cell traffic. J Immunol 1996, 157:495-499.
65. He Y. Scanning electron microscope studies of the rat mesenteric lymph node with special reference to highendothelial venules and hitherto unknown lymphatic labyrinth. Arch Histol Jpn 1985, 48:1-15.
66. Kaldjian EP, Gretz JE, Anderson AO, Shi Y, Shaw S. Spatial and molecular organization of lymph node T cell cortex: a labyrinthine cavity bounded by an epitheliumlike monolayer of fibroblastic reticular cells anchored to basement membrane-like extracellular matrix. Int Immunol 2001, 13:1243-1253.
67. Ohtani O, Ohtani Y, Carati CJ, Gannon BJ. Fluid and cellular pathways of rat lymph nodes in relation to lymphatic labyrinths and Aquaporin-1 expression. Arch Histol Cytol 2003, 66:261-272.
68. Germain RN, Bajenoff M, Castellino F, Chieppa M, Egen JG, et al. Making friends in out-of-the-way places: how cells of the immune system get together and how they conduct their business as revealed by intravital imaging. Immunol Rev 2008, 221:163-181.
69. Ansel KM, Ngo VN, Hyman PL, Luther SA, Forster R, et al. A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles. Nature 2000, 406:309-314.
70. Hardtke S, Ohl L, Forster R. Balanced expression of CXCR5 and CCR7 on follicular T helper cells determines their transient positioning to lymph node follicles and is essential for efficient B-cell help. Blood 2005, 106:1924-1931.
71. Okada T,MillerMJ, Parker I, KrummelMF, Neighbors M, et al.Antigen-engaged B cells undergo chemotaxis toward the T zone and form motile conjugates with helper T cells. PLoS Biol 2005, 3:e150.
72. Castellino F, Germain RN. Cooperation between CD4??and CD8??T cells: when, where, and how. Annu Rev Immunol 2006, 24:519-540.
73. Castellino F, Huang AY, Altan-Bonnet G, Stoll S, Scheinecker C, et al. Chemokines enhance immunity by guiding naive CD8+T cells to sites of CD4+T celldendritic cell interaction. Nature 2006, 440:890-895.