Population genetics of genomics-based crop improvement methods

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 98-106

  Hamblin, Martha T ^a   Buckler, Edward S ^a   Jannink, Jean Luc ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARLEY; CROP IMPROVEMENT; DOMESTICATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; GERMPLASM; MAIZE; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT EVOLUTION; PLANT GENOME; PLEIOTROPY; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW; RICE; SELFING;

AGRICULTURE; BREEDING; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOMICS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 79952102682     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.12.003     Document Type: Review

References (93)

1. Eichler E.E., et al. Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:446-450.
2. Teslovich T.M., et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature 2010, 466:707-713.
3. Terwilliger J.D., Goring H.H. Update to Terwilliger and Goring's 'gene mapping in the 20th and 21st centuries' (2000): gene mapping when rare variants are common and common variants are rare. Hum. Biol. 2009, 81:729-733.
4. Weiss K.M. Tilting at quixotic trait loci (QTL): an evolutionary perspective on genetic causation. Genetics 2008, 179:1741-1756.
5. Cadieu E., et al. Coat variation in the domestic dog is governed by variants in three genes. Science 2009, 326:150-153.
6. Hayes B.J., et al. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle. Genet. Res. 2007, 89:215-220.
7. Atwell S., et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 2010, 465:627-631.
8. Huang X., et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:961-967.
9. Doebley J.F., et al. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 2006, 127:1309-1321.
10. Sang T. Genes and mutations underlying domestication transitions in grasses. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149:63-70.
11. Maccaferri M., et al. Quantitative trait loci for grain yield and adaptation of durum wheat (Triticum durum desf.) across a wide range of water availability. Genetics 2008, 178:489-511.
12. Novoselovic D., et al. Quantitative inheritance of some wheat plant traits. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2004, 27:92-98.
13. Poland J.A., et al. Shades of gray: The world of quantitative disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14:21-29.
14. Jagadish S.V.K., et al. Phenotyping parents of mapping populations of rice for heat tolerance during anthesis. Crop Sci. 2008, 48:1140-1146.
15. Zohary D., Hopf M. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The Origin and Spread of Cultivated Plants in West Asia, Europe, and the Nile Valley 2000, Oxford University Press.
16. Wright S.I., et al. The effects of artificial selection on the maize genome. Science 2005, 308:1310-1314.
17. Geber M.A., Griffen L.R. Inheritance and natural selection on functional traits. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2003, 164(Suppl. 3):S21-S42.
18. Alonso-Blanco C., et al. What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation?. Plant Cell 2009, 21:1877-1896.
19. Walsh B., Blows M.W. Abundant genetic variation plus strong selection=multivariate genetic constraints: a geometric view of adaptation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:41-59.
20. Keightley P.D., Eyre-Walker A. What can we learn about the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations from DNA sequence data?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:1187-1193.
21. Mackay T.F. Mutations and quantitative genetic variation: lessons from Drosophila. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:1229-1239.
22. Camus-Kulandaivelu L., et al. Maize adaptation to temperate climate: relationship between population structure and polymorphism in the Dwarf8 gene. Genetics 2006, 172:2449-2463.
23. Stinchcombe J.R., et al. A latitudinal cline in flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana modulated by the flowering time gene FRIGIDA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:4712-4717.
24. Rose L.E., et al. Natural variation in the Pto disease resistance gene within species of wild tomato (Lycopersicon). II. Population genetics of Pto. Genetics 2007, 175:1307-1319.
25. Lankau R.A. Specialist and generalist herbivores exert opposing selection on a chemical defense. New Phytol. 2007, 175:176-184.
26. Shindo C., et al. Intraspecific competition reveals conditional fitness effects of single gene polymorphism at the Arabidopsis root growth regulator BRX. New Phytol. 2008, 180:71-80.
27. Scarcelli N., et al. Antagonistic pleiotropic effects reduce the potential adaptive value of the FRIGIDA locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:16986-16991.
28. Todesco M., et al. Natural allelic variation underlying a major fitness trade-off in arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2010, 465:632-636.
29. Tenaillon M.I., et al. Selection versus demography: a multilocus investigation of the domestication process in maize. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21:1214-1225.
30. Caicedo A.L., et al. Genome-wide patterns of nucleotide polymorphism in domesticated rice. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:1745-1756.
31. Glemin S., Bataillon T. A comparative view of the evolution of grasses under domestication. New Phytol. 2009, 183:273-290.
32. Kovach M.J., McCouch S.R. Leveraging natural diversity: back through the bottleneck. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11:193-200.
33. Tian F., et al. Tracking footprints of maize domestication and evidence for a massive selective sweep on chromosome 10. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106(Suppl. 1):9979-9986.
34. Sweeney M.T., et al. Global dissemination of a single mutation conferring white pericarp in rice. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e133.
35. Olsen K.M., et al. Selection under domestication: evidence for a sweep in the rice waxy genomic region. Genetics 2006, 173:975-983.
36. Fay J.C., Wu C.I. Hitchhiking under positive darwinian selection. Genetics 2000, 155:1405-1413.
37. Hamblin M.T., et al. Challenges of detecting directional selection after a bottleneck: lessons from Sorghum bicolor. Genetics 2006, 173:953-964.
38. Laurie C.C., et al. The genetic architecture of response to long-term artificial selection for oil concentration in the maize kernel. Genetics 2004, 168:2141-2155.
39. Briggs W.H., et al. Linkage mapping of domestication loci in a large maize teosinte backcross resource. Genetics 2007, 177:1915-1928.
40. Weber A., et al. Major regulatory genes in maize contribute to standing variation in teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis). Genetics 2007, 177:2349-2359.
41. Hancock A.M., et al. Adaptations to new environments in humans: the role of subtle allele frequency shifts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:2459-2468.
42. Johansen C.T., et al. Excess of rare variants in genes identified by genome-wide association study of hypertriglyceridemia. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:684-687.
43. Hawks J., et al. Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:20753-20758.
44. Caldwell K.S., et al. Extreme population-dependent linkage disequilibrium detected in an inbreeding plant species, Hordeum vulgare. Genetics 2006, 172:557-567.
45. Rostoks N., et al. Recent history of artificial outcrossing facilitates whole-genome association mapping in elite inbred crop varieties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:18656-18661.
46. Hamblin M.T., et al. Population structure and linkage disequilibrium in US barley germplasm: implications for association mapping. Crop Sci. 2010, 50:556-566.
47. Morrell P.L., et al. Low levels of linkage disequilibrium in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) despite high rates of self-fertilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:2442-2447.
48. Kraakman A.T., et al. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of yield and yield stability in modern spring barley cultivars. Genetics 2004, 168:435-446.
49. Waugh R., et al. The emergence of whole genome association scans in barley. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12:218-222.
50. Wenzl P., et al. Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for whole-genome profiling of barley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:9915-9920.
51. Bradbury P.J., et al. Assessment of power and false discovery rate in genome-wide association studies using the BarleyCAP germplasm. Crop Sci. 2010, 51:52-59.
52. Stern D.L., Orgogozo V. Is genetic evolution predictable?. Science 2009, 323:746-751.
53. Harjes C.E., et al. Natural genetic variation in lycopene epsilon cyclase tapped for maize biofortification. Science 2008, 319:330-333.
54. Shi J., et al. Unraveling the complex trait of crop yield with quantitative trait loci mapping in Brassica napus. Genetics 2009, 182:851-861.
55. Durand E., et al. Standing variation and new mutations both contribute to a fast response to selection for flowering time in maize inbreds. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10. Article No. 2.
56. Walsh B. Population- and quantitative-genetic models of selection limits. Plant Breed. Rev. 2003, 24:177-225.
57. Hill W.G., Robertson A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 1966, 8:269-294.
58. Buckler E.S., et al. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 2009, 325:714-718.
59. Hall D., et al. Adaptive population differentiation in phenology across a latitudinal gradient in european aspen (Populus tremula, L.): a comparison of neutral markers, candidate genes and phenotypic traits. Evolution 2007, 61:2849-2860.
60. McKay J.K., Latta R.G. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:285-291.
61. Yu J., et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:203-208.
62. Zhao K., et al. An Arabidopsis example of association mapping in structured samples. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e4.
63. Daetwyler H.D., et al. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 2010, 185:1021-1031.
64. Zhao K., et al. Genomic diversity and introgression in O. sativa reveal the impact of domestication and breeding on the rice genome. PLoS One 2010, 5:e10780.
65. Kang H.M., et al. Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 2008, 178:1709-1723.
66. Brachi B., et al. Linkage and association mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time in nature. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000940.
67. Myles S., et al. Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design. Plant Cell 2009, 21:2194-2202.
68. Hayes B.J., et al. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:51.
69. Lorenz A.J. et al. (2011) Genomic selection in plant breeding: knowledge and prospects. Advances in Agronomy 110 (in press).
70. Hayes B.J., et al. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. 2009, 91:47-60.
71. Zhang Z., et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:355-360.
72. Meuwissen T.H., et al. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
73. Bernardo R., Yu J. Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci. 2007, 47:1082-1090.
74. Habier D., et al. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 2007, 177:2389-2397.
75. Gianola D., van Kaam J.B. Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits. Genetics 2008, 178:2289-2303.
76. Solberg T.R., et al. Reducing dimensionality for prediction of genome-wide breeding values. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:29.
77. Jannink J.L., et al. Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief. Funct. Genomics 2010, 9:166-177.
78. Ossowski S., et al. The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 2010, 327:92-94.
79. Glemin S., et al. Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:3011-3019.
80. Nordborg M. Linkage disequilibrium, gene trees and selfing: an ancestral recombination graph with partial self-fertilization. Genetics 2000, 154:923-929.
81. Morrell P.L., et al. Distinct geographic patterns of genetic diversity are maintained in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) despite migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:10812-10817.
82. Morrell P.L., Clegg M.T. Genetic evidence for a second domestication of barley (Hordeum vulgare) east of the fertile crescent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:3289-3294.
83. Komatsuda T., Tanno K. Comparative high resolution map of the six-rowed spike locus 1 (vrs1) in several populations of barley, Hordeum vulgare L. Hereditas 2004, 141:68-73.
84. Malysheva-Otto L.V., et al. Analysis of molecular diversity, population structure and linkage disequilibrium in a worldwide survey of cultivated barley germplasm (Hordeum vulgare L.). BMC Genet. 2006, 7:6.
85. Matsuoka Y., et al. A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:6080-6084.
86. Vigouroux Y., et al. Population structure and genetic diversity of new world maize races assessed by DNA microsatellites. Am. J. Bot. 2008, 95:1240-1253.
87. Brown A.H., Allard R.W. Estimation of the mating system in open-pollinated maize populations using isozyme polymorphisms. Genetics 1970, 66:133-145.
88. Liu K., et al. Genetic structure and diversity among maize inbred lines as inferred from DNA microsatellites. Genetics 2003, 165:2117-2128.
89. Londo J.P., et al. Phylogeography of asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon, reveals multiple independent domestications of cultivated rice, Oryza sativa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:9578-9583.
90. Hayashi T., Iwata H. Bayesian QTL mapping for multiple families derived from crossing a set of inbred lines to a reference line. Heredity 2009, 102:497-505.
91. Yu J., et al. Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 2008, 178:539-551.
92. Stich B. Comparison of mating designs for establishing nested association mapping populations in maize and Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2009, 183:1525-1534.
93. Knapp S.J., Bridges W.C. Using molecular markers to estimate quantitative trait locus parameters: power and genetic variances for unreplicated and replicated progeny. Genetics 1990, 126:769-777.