Specialist and generalist herbivores exert opposing selection on a chemical defense

New Phytologist

Volumn 175, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 176-184

  Lankau, Richard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Brassica nigra; Brevicoryne brassicae; Chemical defense; Generalist; Glucosinolates; Herbivore; Selection; Specialist

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSINOLATE; SINIGRIN;

CHEMICAL DEFENSE; COEVOLUTION; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; DICOTYLEDON; DOMINANCE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; HERBIVORE; SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BRASSICA; DECISION MAKING; DIET; DRUG EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT SEED; SEEDLING; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DIET; GLUCOSINOLATES; MUSTARD PLANT; PLANTS; SEEDLING; SEEDS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

BRASSICA; BRASSICA NIGRA; BREVICORYNE BRASSICAE;

EID: 34249847790     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02090.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Agrawal AA, Strauss SY, Stout MJ. 1999. Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53: 1093 1104.
2. Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR. 1992. Genetics of secondary metabolism and herbivore resistance in plants. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR, eds. Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites. Volume Ii: Ecological and Evolutionary Processes. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 415 438.
3. Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR. 1998. Chemical phenotype matching between a plant and its insect herbivore. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95: 13743 13748.
4. Canty A. 2005. boot: Bootstrap R (S-plus) functions. Report by B. Ripley R Package, version 1.2-24.
5. Cole RA. 1997. The relative importance of glucosinolates and amino acids to the development of two aphid pests Brevicoryne brassicaeand Myzus persicaeon wild and cultivated Brassicaspecies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 85: 121 133.
6. Da Costa C, Jones CM. 1971. Cucumber beetle resistance and mite susceptibility controlled by the Bitter gene in Cucumis sativusL. Science 3988: 1145 1146.
7. van Dam NM, Vuister LWM, Bergshoeff C, Devos H, Vandermeijden E. 1995. The raison-d'être of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Cynoglossum officinale- deterrent effects against generalist herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 507 523.
8. Ehrlich P, Raven P. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586 608.
9. Ellner S, Hairston NG. 1994. Role of overlapping generations in maintaining genetic-variation in a fluctuating environment. American Naturalist 143: 403 417.
10. Fritz RS, Simms EL, eds. 1992. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
11. Giamoustaris A, Mithen R. 1995. The effect of modifying the glucosinolate content of leaves of oilseed rape (Brassica napusssp. oleifera) on its interaction with specialist and generalist pests. Annals of Applied Biology (347-363 126 (122).
12. Gillespie J, Langley CH. 1974. General model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. Genetics 76: 837 884.
13. Gomez JM. 2003. Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. American Naturalist 162: 242 256.
14. Joshi J, Vrieling K. 2005. The enemy release and Eica hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecology Letters 8: 704 714.
15. Juenger T, Bergelson J. 1998. Pairwise versus diffuse natural selection and the multiple herbivores of Scarlet Gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 52: 1583 1592.
16. Juenger T, Bergelson J. 2000. The evolution of compensation to herbivory in Scarlet Gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54: 764 777.
17. Juenger T, Morton TC, Miller RE, Bergelson J. 2005. Scarlet Gilia resistance to insect herbivory: the effects of early season browsing, plant apparency, and phytochemistry on patterns of seed fly attack. Evolutionary Ecology 19: 79 101.
18. Kliebenstein DJ. 2004. Secondary metabolites and plant/environment interactions: a view through Arabidopsis thalianatinged glasses. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 675 684.
19. Kliebenstein DJ, Kroymann J, Brown P, Figuth A, Pedersen D, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T. 2001. Genetic control of natural variation in Arabidopsisglucosinolate accumulation. Plant Physiology 126: 811 825.
20. Kliebenstein D, Pedersen D, Barker B, Mitchell-Olds T. 2002. Comparative analysis of quantitative trait loci controlling glucosinolates, myrosinase and insect resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 161: 325 332.
21. Ludwig D, Levin SA. 1991. Evolutionary stability of plant-communities and the maintenance of multiple dispersal types. Theoretical Population Biology 40: 285 307.
22. Macel M, Vrieling K. 2003. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids as oviposition stimulants for the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 1435 1446.
23. Mauricio R. 1998. Costs of resistance to natural enemies in field populations of the annual plant Arabidopsis thaliana. American Naturalist 151: 20 28.
24. Mauricio R. 2000. Natural Selection and the Joint Evolution of Tolerance and Resistance as Plant Defenses. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 491 507.
25. Mauricio R, Rausher MD. 1997. Experimental manipulation of putative selective agents provides evidence for the role of natural enemies in the evolution of plant defense. Evolution 51: 1435 1444.
26. van der Meijden E. 1996. Plant defence, an evolutionary dilemma: contrasting effects of (specialist and generalist) herbivores and natural enemies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90: 307 310.
27. Memmott J, Fowler SV, Paynter Q, Sheppard AW, Syrett P. 2000. The Invertebrate fauna on broom, Cytisus scoparius, in two native and two exotic habitats. Acta Oecologica - International Journal of Ecologica 21: 213 222.
28. Mitchell-Olds T, Shaw RG. 1987. Regression-analysis of natural-selection - statistical-inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41: 1149 1161.
29. Muller C, Martens N. 2005. Testing predictions of the 'evolution of increased competitive ability' hypothesis for an invasive crucifer. Evolutionary Ecology 19: 533 550.
30. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T. 2004. Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 417 422.
31. Nieminen M, Suomi J, van Nouhuys S, Sauri P, Riekkola ML. 2003. Effect of iridoid glycoside content on oviposition host plant choice and parasitism in a specialist herbivore. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 823 844.
32. Pilson D. 1996. Two herbivores and constraints on selection for resistance in Brassica rapa. Evolution 50: 1492 1500.
33. Pilson D. 2000. The evolution of plant response to herbivory: simultaneously considering resistance and tolerance in Brassica rapa. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 457 489.
34. Price PW. 1991. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62: 244 251.
35. Rausher MD. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits - biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46: 616 626.
36. Rausher MD, Simms EL. 1989. The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. 1. Attempts to detect selection. Evolution 43: 563 572.
37. Raybould AF, Moyes CL. 2001. The ecological genetics of aliphatic glucosinolates. Heredity 87: 383 391.
38. Shonle I, Bergelson J. 2000. Evolutionary ecology of the tropane alkaloids of Datura stramoniumL. (Solanaceae). Evolution 54: 778 788.
39. Siemens DH, Mitchel-Olds T. 1996. Glucosinolates and herbivory by specialists (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): consequences of concentration and induced resistance. Environmental Entomology 25: 1344 1353.
40. Stanton ML, Thiede DA. 2005. Statistical convenience vs biological insight: consequences of data transformation for the analysis of fitness variation in heterogeneous environments. New Phytologists 166: 319 337.
41. Stinchcombe JR, Rausher MD. 2001. Diffuse selection on resistance to deer herbivory in the ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. American Naturalist 158: 376 388.
42. Stinchcombe JR, Rausher MD. 2002. The evolution of tolerance to deer herbivory: modifications caused by the abundance of insect herbivores. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 269: 1241 1246.
43. Strauss SY, Irwin RE. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35: 435 466.
44. Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA, Irwin RE. 2002. Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 278 284.
45. Tiffin P. 2002. Competition and time of damage affect the pattern of selection acting on plant defense against herbivores. Ecology 83: 1981 1990.
46. Traw MB. 2002. Is induction response negatively correlated with constitutive resistance in black mustard? Evolution 56: 2196 2205.