Fixation of 5-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures and resulting bone loading: A finite element assessment based on in vivo strain measurements

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 756-762

  Karl, Matthias ^a   Winter, Werner ^a   Taylor, Thomas D ^b   Heckmann, Siegfried M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone loading; Cement fixation; Finite element analysis; In vivo strain measurements; Passive fit; Screw retention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BITE FORCE; CEMENTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 33750551961     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: Current status. Implant Dent 2001; 10:85-92.
2. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;16:1-132.
3. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:216-222.
4. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.
5. Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: Which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-141.
6. Misch CE. Screw-retained versus cement-retained implant-supported prostheses. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995; 7:15-18.
7. Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:167-178.
8. Kunavisarut C, Lang LA, Stoner BR, Felton DA. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. J Prosthodont 2002;11:30-40.
9. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: A critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-728.
10. Hecker DM, Eckert SE. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: Changes in component fit over time. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:346-351.
11. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13.
12. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Cement fixation and screw retention: Parameters of passive fit-An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:466-473.
13. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:30-37.
14. Karl M, Rösch S, Graef F, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:324-330.
15. Karl M, Rösch S, Graef F, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. Strain situation after fixation of 3-unit ceramic veneered implant superstructures. Implant Dent 2005;14:157-165.
16. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: An animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 207-218.
17. Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:500-509.
18. Melsen B, Lang NP. Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:144-152.
19. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Johansson CB. Bone response to implant-supported frameworks with differing degrees of misfit preload: In vivo study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:129-137.
20. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:585-598.
21. DeTolla DH, Andreana S, Patra A, Buhite R, Comella B. Role of the finite element model in dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:77-81.
22. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation-A finite element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:345-350.
23. Keaveny TM, Guo XE, Wachtel EF, McMahon TA, Hayes WC. Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. J Biomech 1994;27:1127-1136.
24. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:529-536.
25. Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, et al. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:407-418.
26. Carr AB, Brunski JB, Hurley E. Effects of fabrication, finishing and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional "gold" and plastic cylinders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:589-598.
27. Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 2004;74:3-15.
28. Brägger U, Aeschlimann S, Burgin W, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:26-34.
29. Keith SE, Miller BH, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:369-378.
30. Natali AN, Pavan PG. A comparative analysis based on different strength criteria for evaluation of risk factor for dental implants. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2002;5: 127-133.