Consumers and new food technologies

Trends in Food Science and Technology

Volumn 22, Issue 2-3, 2011, Pages 99-111

  Rollin, Fanny ^a   Kennedy, Jean ^a   Wills, Josephine ^a  

^a Tassel House ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CLONING; CASE-STUDIES; FOOD IRRADIATION; GENETIC MODIFICATIONS; NUTRIGENOMICS;

CLONING;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 79951950290     PISSN: 09242244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2010.09.001     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Aprea A. Welcome package on food safety 2009, Requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, European Parliament, Brussels, July 2009.
2. Batista R., Oliveira M.M. Facts and fiction of genetically engineered food. Trends in Biotechnology 2009, 27(5):277-286.
3. Bauer M.W., Allum N., Miller S. What have we learnt from 25 years of PUS research - liberating and widening the agenda. Public Understanding of Science 2007, 15(1):1-17.
4. Bauer M.W., Kohring M., Gutteling J., Allansdottir A. The dramatisation of biotechnology in the elite mass media. Biotechnology 1996-2000-the years of controversy 2001, 35-52. Science Museum, London. G. Gaskell, M.W. Bauer (Eds.).
5. Bredahl L., Grunert K.G., Frewer L.J. Consumer attitudes and decision-making with regard to genetically engineered food products. A review of the literature and a presentation of models for future research. Journal of Consumer Policy 1998, 21:251-277.
6. Bruhn C.M. Enhancing consumer acceptance of new processing technologies. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 2007, 8:555-558.
7. Bruhn C.M. Consumer acceptance of food innovations. Innovation: Management. Policy & Practice 2008, 10(1):91-95.
8. Bruhn C.M., Mason A. Community leader response to educational information about biotechnology. Journal of Food Science 2002, 67:399-403.
9. Burgess M.M. Starting on the right foot: Public consultation to inform issue definition in genome policy (No. DEG 002) 2003, W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, Vancouver.
10. Burnet F., Carrada G., Chicoineau L., Cremer S., De Capoa E., Franche C., et al. Report from the workshop: communication outreach in nanotechnology: from recommendations to action (Brussels, 24-25 October, 2007). European Commission, unit " Nano- and converging sciences and technologies" 2008, Inge De Prins, COST Office, Brussels, Belgium. M. Bonazzi, J. Palumbo (Eds.).
11. Cardello A.V., Schutz H.G., Lesher L.L. Consumer perceptions of foods processed by innovative and emerging technologies: a conjoint analytic study. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 2007, 8:73-83.
12. Chaudhry Q., Scotter M., Blackburn J., Ross B., Boxall A., Castle L., et al. Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Additives and Contaminants 2008, 25(3):241-258.
13. CONSUMERCHOICE European Commission framework 6. Do European consumers buy GM foods? Final report. Framework 6. Instrument: 5.4.3 area: impact of food on health, thematic priority: 5 food quality and safety URL, Last Accessed 3.11.09. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/consumerchoice.
14. Costa-Font M., Gil J.M., Traill B.W. Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: review and implications for food policy. Food Policy 2008, 33:99-111.
15. Curtis K.R., McCluskey J.J., Wahl T.I. Consumer acceptance of genetically modified food products in the developing world. AgBioForum 2004, 7(1&2):70-75.
16. Dekkers S., de Heer C., de Jong W.H., Sips A.J.A.M., van Engelen J.G.M., Kampers F.W.H. Nanomaterials in consumer products 2006, Availability on the European market and adequacy of the regulatory framework. Requested by the European Parliament's Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, European Parliament, Brussels, 2006.
17. DeRuiter F.E., Dwyer J. Consumer acceptance of irradiated foods: dawn of a new era?. Food Service Technology 2002, 2(2):47-58.
18. van Dijk H., Houghton J., van Kleef E., van der Lans I., Rowe G., Frewer L. Consumer responses to communication about food risk management. Appetite 2008, 50:340-352.
19. Directorate General Health and Consumers Submissions scientific hearing on nanotechnology URL, Last Accessed 3.11.09. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/nano_submissions.pdf.
20. Eurobarometer Social values, science and technology 2005, Special Eurobarometer 225/Wave 63.1, TNS Opinion & Social, Brussels, June 2005.
21. Eurobarometer Special eurobarometer 244b/Wave 64.3: Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends 2006, Survey requested by Directorate General for Research and coordinated by Directorate General Press and Communication (European Commission), TNS Opinion & Social, Brussels, July 2006.
22. Eurobarometer Risk issues. Special eurobarometer 238/Wave 64.1 2006, TNS Opinion & Social, Brussels, February 2006.
23. Eurobarometer Europeans' attitudes towards animal cloning, analytical report. Flash eurobarometer 2008, Vol. 238. Survey requested by Directorate General Health and Consumers and coordinated by Directorate General Communication (European Commission), The Gallup Organization, Brussels, October 2008.
24. European Commission. (2004). EU Policy for nanosciences and nanotechnologies 2004-2008.
25. European Commission Report on food irradiation for the year 2005 (2007/C 122/03). Official Journal of the European Union 2007, C 122/3 of 2.6.2007.
26. European Opinion Research Group - EORG Europeans, science and technology. Eurobarometer 55.2 2001, Survey requested by Directorate-General for Research and conducted by Directorate-General for Press and Communication, Public Opinion Sector, Brussels, December 2001.
27. Fam K.S., Waller D.S., Erdogan B.Z. The influence of religion on attitudes towards the advertising of controversial products. European Journal of Marketing 2004, 38(5/6):537-555.
28. Fell D., Wilkins C., Kivinen E., Austin A., Fernandez M. An evidence review of public attitudes to emerging food technologies 2009, A Brook Lyndhurst Report for the Food Standards Agency.
29. Food Marketing Institute U.S. grocery shopper trends 2005, Food Marketing Institute, Washington, D.C.
30. Food Standards Agency - FSA Irradiation URL, Last Accessed 3.11.09. http://www.eatwell.gov.uk/healthissues/factsbehindissues/irradiation/.
31. Food Standards Agency of Ireland - FSAI Irradiated food URL, Last Accessed 3.11.09. http://www.fsai.ie/assets/0/86/204/e3694b0c-be39-43a2-a322-eb4ad54cb722.pdf.
32. Frewer L.J., Howard C., Aaron I. Consumers acceptance of transgenic crops. Pesticide Science 1998, 52:338-393.
33. Frewer L.J., Howard C., Hedderley D., Shepherd R. Consumer attitudes towards different food-processing technologies used in cheese production - the influence of consumer benefit. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8(4):271-280.
34. Frewer L., Lassen J., Kettlitz B., Scholderer J., Beekman V., Berdal K.G. Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2004, 42:1181-1193.
35. Frewer L., Salter B. Public attitudes, scientific advice and the politics of regulatory policy: the case of BSE. Science and Public Policy 2002, 29(2):137-145.
36. Gaskell G. Agricultural biotechnology and public attitudes in the European Union. AgBioForum 2000, 3(2&3):87-96.
37. Gaskell G., Ten Eyck T., Jackson J., Veltri G. Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States. Public Understanding of Science 2005, 14:81-90.
38. Grimsrud, R., McCluskey, J., Loureiro, M., & Wahl, T. (2002). Consumer attitudes toward genetically modified food in Norway. In: The Joint annual meetings of the WAEA/AAEA, Long Beach, CA, 28-31 July 2002.
39. Hallman W.K., Condry S.S. Public opinion and media coverage of animal cloning and the food supply: Executive summary 2006, Food Policy Institute, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
40. He S., Fletcher S., Rimal A. Attitudes, acceptance, and consumption: the case of beef irradiation. Journal of Food Distribution Research 2005, 36(1):65-70.
41. He S., Fletcher S., Rimal A. Unwillingness to consume irradiated beef. Journal of Food Distribution Research 2005, 36(1):71-78.
42. Henson S. Demand-side constraints on the introduction of new food technologies: the case of food irradiation. Food Policy 1995, 20(2):111-127.
43. Hicks D.T., Pivarnik L.F., McDermott R., Richard N., Hoover D.G., Kniel K.E. Consumer awareness and willingness to pay for high-pressure processing of ready-to-eat food. Journal of Food Science Education 2009, 8(2):32-38.
44. Hoban T. Public attitudes toward agricultural biotechnology 2004, ESA Working Paper No. 04-09, Agricultural Economics and Development Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, URL, Last Accessed 19th November. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/ae064e/ae064e00.pdf.
45. Houghton J.R., Van Kleef E., Rowe G., Frewer L.J. Consumer perceptions of the effectiveness of food risk management practices: a cross-cultural study. Health, Risk & Society 2006, 8(2):165-183.
46. House, L., Morrow, B., Lusk, J., & Moore, M. (2001). Modeling Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for genetically-modified foods in the United States and the European Union. In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Association Annual Meeting - The World Food and Agribusiness Symposium, Sydney, Australia, June 27-28, 2001.
47. Huang J., Qiu H., Bai J., Pray C. Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China. Appetite 2006, 46:144-151.
48. Institute of Food Technologists - IFT IFT expert report on biotechnology and foods, benefits and concerns associated with recombinant DNA biotechnology-derived foods. Food Technology 2000, 54(10):37-56.
49. van Kleef E., Frewer L.J., Chryssochoidis G.M., Houghton J.R., Korzen-Bohrd S., Krystallisb T., et al. Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: results from a cross-European study. Appetite 2006, 47:46-63.
50. van Kleef E., Houghton J.R., Krystallis A., Pfenning U., Rowe G., Van Dijk H., et al. Consumer evaluations of food risk management quality in Europe. Risk Analysis 2007, 27(6):1565-1580.
51. Landmark Europe Nanotechnology in consumer products: challenges and opportunities for Europe 2009, Landmark Public Policy Advisers Europe 2009.
52. Lee C.-J., Scheufele D.A., Lewenstein B.V. Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication 2005, 27(2):240-267.
53. Loureiro M., Bugbee M. Enhanced GM foods: are consumers ready to pay for the potential benefits of biotechnology?. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 2005, 39:52-70.
54. Macoubrie J. Informed public perceptions of nanotechnology and trust in government 2005, The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, WoodrowWilson International Center for Scholars, Washington D.C.
55. McCluskey J.J., Grimsrud K.M., Wahl T.I. Comparison of consumer responses to genetically modified foods in Asia, North America, and Europe. Economics and policy 2006, Vol. 30:227-240. Springer, US. R.E. Just, J.M. Alston, D. Zilberman (Eds.).
56. Müller M., Kersten S. Nutrigenomics: goals and strategies. Nature-Reviews 2003, 4:315-322.
57. Nayga R.M., Aiew W., Nichols J.P. Information effects on consumers' willingness to purchase irradiated food products. Review of Agricultural Economics 2005, 27(1):37-48.
58. Nelson C.H. Risk perception, behavior, and consumer response to genetically modified organisms. American Behavioral Scientist 2001, 44(8):1371-1388.
59. Onyango B., Ferdaus H., Hallman W., Schilling B., Adelajan A. Public perceptions of food biotechnology: uncovering factors driving consumer acceptance of genetically modified food. Journal of Food Distribution Research 2003, 34:37-42.
60. Onyango B.M., Rodolfo M.N. Consumer acceptance of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified food: relevance of gene transfer technology. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2004, 29(3):567-583.
61. O'Fallon M.J., Gursoy D., Swanger N. To buy or not to buy: impact of labeling on purchasing intentions of genetically modified foods. Hospitality Management 2007, 26:117-130.
62. Rimal A.P., McWatters K.H., Hashim I.B., Fletcher S.M. Intended vs. Actual purchase behavior for irradiated beef: a simulated supermarket setup (sss) experiment. Journal of Food Products Marketing 2004, 10(4):1-15.
63. Rogers-Hayden T., Mohr A., Pidgeon N. Introduction: engaging with nanotechnologies - engaging differently?. NanoEthics 2007, 1:123-130.
64. Ronteltap A., van Trijp H. Consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition. Genes & Nutrition 2007, 2:85-87.
65. Ronteltap A., van Trijp J.C.M., Renes R.J., Frewer L.J. Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite 2007, 49:1-17.
66. Rowe G., Frewer L., Sjöberg L. Newspaper reporting of hazards in the UK and Sweden. Public Understanding of Science 2000, 9:59-78.
67. Savadori L., Savio S., Nocotra E., Rumiati R., Finucane M., Slovic P. Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Analysis 2004, 24:1289-1299.
68. Scholderer J., Frewer L.J. The biotechnology communication paradox: experimental evidence and need for new strategy. Journal of Consumer Policy 2003, 26:125-157.
69. Siegrist M. Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technology and products. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2008, 19:603-608.
70. Siegrist M., Cousin M., Kastenholz H., Wiek A public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust. Appetite 2007, 49(2):459-466.
71. Siegrist M., Stampfli N., Kastenholz H. Acceptance of nanotechnology foods: a conjoint study examining consumers' willingness to buy. British Food Journal 2009, 111(7):660-668.
72. Siegrist M., Stampfli N., Kastenholz H., Keller C. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging. Appetite 2008, 51:283-290.
73. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236(4799):280-285.
74. Smallman M., Nieman A. Small talk: Discussing nanotechnologies 2006, Think-Lab, London.
75. Smillie L., Blissett A. A model for developing risk communication strategy. Journal of Risk Research 2010, 13(1):115-134.
76. Spence A., Townsend E. Examining consumer behaviour toward genetically modified (GM) food in Britain. Risk Analysis 2006, 26:657-670.
77. Stewart-Knox B.J., Bunting B.P., Gilpin S., Parr H.J., Pinhão S., Strain J.J., et al. Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers. British Journal of Nutrition 2009, 101:982-989.
78. Søndergaard H.A., Grunert K.G., Scholderer J. Consumer attitudes to enzymes in food production. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2005, 16:466-474.
79. Teisl M.F., Fein S.B., Levy A.S. Information effects on consumer attitudes toward three food technologies: organic production, biotechnology and irradiation. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:586-596.
80. Ten Eyck T., Gaskell G. Comparative research on biotechnology and the public 2003, Report to the US - EC Task Force on Biotechnology Research, The National Science Foundation.
81. Uzogara S.G. The impact of genetic modification of human foods in the 21st century: a review. Biotechnology Advances 2000, 18:179-206.
82. Veeman, M., Adamowicz, W., & Hu, W. (2005). Risk perceptions, social interactions and the influence of information on social attitudes to agricultural biotechnology. Project Report 05-02; AARI Project Report 2001J025.
83. Verbeke W., Viaene J., Guiot O. Health communication and consumer behavior on meat in Belgium: from BSE until dioxin. Journal of Health Communication 1999, 4(4):345-357.
84. Wang S.S., Fridinger F., Sheedy K.M., Khoury M.J. Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic research. Community Genetics 2001, 4:18-26.
85. World Health Organisation - WHO Report of a WHO expert consultation meeting 2006, Venice - Island of San ServoloItaly, 29-30 May 2006.
86. World Health Organisation - WHO 20 questions on genetically modified (GM) foods URL, Last Accessed 3.11.09. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/biotech/20questions/en/.