The impact of sequence parameter values on phylogenetic accuracy

Biology and Medicine

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 50-62

  Dwivedi, Bhakti ^a   Gadagkar, Sudhindra R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON   (United States)

^b CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Molecular evolution; Nucleotide substitution rate; Phylogenetic accuracy; Phylogenetic inference; Substitution saturation; Transition transversion rate ratio

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951577735     PISSN: None     EISSN: 09748369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Cartwright, R. A. (2005). DNA assembly with gaps (Dawg): simulating sequence evolution. Bioinformatics 21: 31-38.
2. Felsenstein, J. (1989). PHYLIP - Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5: 164-166.
3. Felsenstein, J. (2003). Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates Inc.
4. Gadagkar, S. R. and Kumar, S. (2005). Maximum likelihood outperforms maximum parsimony even when evolutionary rates are heterotachous. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22(11): 2139-2141.
5. Gadagkar, S. R., Rosenberg, M. S. and Kumar, S. (2005). Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: Concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B-Molecular and Developmental Evolution 304B(1): 64-74.
6. Guindon, S. and Gascuel, O. (2003). A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52(5): 696-704.
7. Halanych, K. M. and Robinson, T. J. (1999). Multiple substitutions affect the phylogenetic utility of cytochrome b and 12S rDNA data: Examining a rapid radiation in Leporid (Lagomorpha) evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 48(3): 369-379.
8. Hall, B. G. (2005). Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences (vol 22, pg 792, 2005). Molecular Biology and Evolution 22(4): 1160-1160.
9. Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H. and Yano, T. A. (1985). Dating of the Human Ape Splitting by a Molecular Clock of Mitochondrial-DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22(2): 160-174.
10. Hillis, D. M. (1995). Approaches for Assessing Phylogenetic Accuracy. Systematic Biology 44(1): 3-16.
11. Hillis, D. M., Bull, J. J., White, M. E., Badgett, M. R. and Molineux, I. J. (1992). Experimental Phylogenetics - Generation of a Known Phylogeny. Science 255(5044): 589-592.
12. Huelsenbeck, J. P. and Rannala, B. (2004). Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Systematic Biology 53(6): 904-913.
13. Maddison, D. R., Schulz, K. S. and Maddison, W. P. (2007). The Tree of Life Web Project. Zootaxa(1668): 19-40.
14. Mardis, E. R. (2008). Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 9: 387-402.
15. Nei, M. (1996). Phylogenetic analysis in molecular evolutionary genetics. Annual Review of Genetics 30: 371-403.
16. Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2000). Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York, Oxford University Press, Inc.
17. Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2000). Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York, Oxford University Press.
18. Nichols, R. (2001). Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16(7): 358-364.
19. Ogden, T. H. and Rosenberg, M. S. (2006). Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology 55(2): 314-328.
20. Ou, C. Y., Ciesielski, C. A., Myers, G., Bandea, C. I., Luo, C. C., Korber, B. T. M., Mullins, J. I., Schochetman, G., Berkelman, R. L., Economou, A. N., Witte, J. J., Furman, L. J., Satten, G. A., Macinnes, K. A., Curran, J. W. and Jaffe, H. W. (1992). Molecular Epidemiology of HIV Transmission in a Dental Practice. Science 256(5060): 1165-1171.
21. Penny, D. and Hendy, M. D. (1985). The Use of Tree Comparison Metrics. Systematic Zoology 34(1): 75-82.
22. Raghava, G. P. S., Searle, S. M. J., Audley, P. C., Barber, J. D. and Barton, G. J. (2003). OXBench: A benchmark for evaluation of protein multiple sequence alignment accuracy. BMC Bioinformatics 4.
23. Regier, J. C. and Shultz, J. W. (1997). Molecular phylogeny of the major arthropod groups indicates polyphyly of Crustaceans and a new hypothesis for the origin of hexapods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14(9): 902-913.
24. Robinson, D. F. and Foulds, L. R. (1981). Comparison of Phylogenetic Trees. Mathematical Biosciences 53(1-2): 131-147.
25. Rosenberg, M. S. (2005a). Evolutionary distance estimation and fidelity of pair wise sequence alignment. Bmc Bioinformatics 6.
26. Rosenberg, M. S. (2005b). Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and evolutionary distance estimation. Bmc Bioinformatics 6.
27. Rosenberg, M. S. and Kumar, S. (2003). Heterogeneity of nucleotide frequencies among evolutionary lineages and phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20(4): 610-621.
28. Saitou, N. and Ueda, S. (1994). Evolutionary Rates of Insertion and Deletion in Noncoding Nucleotide-Sequences of Primates. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11(3): 504-512.
29. Singh, J., Behal, A., Singla, N., Joshi, A., Birbian, N., Singh, S., Bali, V. and Batra, N. (2009). Metagenomics: Concept, methodology, ecological inference and recent advances. Biotechnology Journal.
30. Struck, T., Hessling, R. and Purschke, G. (2002). The phylogenetic position of the Aeolosomatidae and Parergodrilidae, two enigmatic oligochaete-like taxa of the 'Polychaeta', based on molecular data from 18S rDNA sequences. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 40(3): 155-163.
31. Struck, T. H., Nesnidal, M. P., Purschke, G. and Halanych, K. M. (2008). Detecting possibly saturated positions in 18S and 28S sequences and their influence on phylogenetic reconstruction of Annelida (Lophotrochozoa). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48(2): 628-645.
32. Struck, T. H., Schult, N., Kusen, T., Hickman, E., Bleidorn, C., McHugh, D. and Halanych, K. M. (2007). Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7.
33. Swofford, D. L. (2003). PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates Inc.
34. Takahashi, K. and Nei, M. (2000). Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17(8): 1251-1258.
35. Tamura, K., Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2004). Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(30): 11030-11035.
36. Wakeley, J. (1996). The excess of transitions among nucleotide substitutions: New methods of estimating transition bias underscore its significance. TREE 11: 158-163.
37. Xia, X. (2000). Chapter 20-Data Analysis in Molecular Biology and Evolution. Boston, Kluwer Academic
38. Xia, X. (2000). Data Analysis in Molecular Biology and Evolution. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
39. Xia, X. and Xie, Z. (2001). DAMBE: Software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. Journal of Heredity 92(4): 371-373.
40. Xia, X., Xie, Z., Salemi, M., Chen, L. and Wang, Y. (2003). An index of substitution saturation and its application. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26: 1-7.
41. Xia, X. H. (1998). The rate heterogeneity of nonsynonymous substitutions in mammalian mitochondrial genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15(3): 336-344.
42. Xia, X. H., Xie, Z., Salemi, M., Chen, L. and Wang, Y. (2003). An index of substitution saturation and its application. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26(1): 1-7.
43. Yang, Z. H. (1996a). Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 42(5): 587-596.
44. Yang, Z. H. (1996b). Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. Journal of Molecular Evolution 42(2): 294-307.
45. Yang, Z. H. (1996c). Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11(9): 367-372.
46. Yang, Z. H. (1998). On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 47(1): 125-133.
47. Yang, Z. H. and Yoder, A. D. (1999). Estimation of the Transition/Transversion Rate Bias and Species Sampling. Journal of Molecular Evolution 48: 274-283.
48. Yoder, A. D., Vilgalys, R. D. and Ruvolo, M. (1996). Molecular evolutionary dynamics of cytochrome b in strepsirrhine primates: The phylogenetic significance of third codon position transversions. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 1339-1350.